Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 1053–1064 | Cite as

Price convergence in an online virtual world

Article

Abstract

This paper tests for the existence of price convergence using a unique data set from the largest online game, World of Warcraft. It provides a controlled setting without the usual obstacles that make testing price convergence difficult. These difficulties include trade barriers, transportation costs, imperfections and restrictions in capital markets, and differences in productivity growth. The data set consists of eight structurally identical copies, or worlds, of a virtual macroeconomy. We use the non-linear convergence test developed by Phillips and Sul (Econometrica 75(6):1771–1855, 2007), and find price convergence in all eight worlds. We further develop our own simple band of inaction test for price convergence, and under reasonable parameters find price convergence in all eight worlds.

Keywords

Price convergence Law of one price Virtual worlds Online video games Phillips Sul log t Band of inaction 

JEL Classification

F1 F3 C99 C23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balassa B (1964) The purchasing-power parity doctrine: a reappraisal. J Political Econ 72(6): 584–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum CF, Barkoulas JT, Caglayan M (2001) Nonlinear adjustment to purchasing power parity in the Post-Bretton woods era. J Int Money Finance 20(3):379–399. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30443/description#description Google Scholar
  3. Blizzard Entertainment (2008a) World of Warcraft Top List. http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/toplist/buttons.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2008
  4. Blizzard Entertainment (2008b) World of Warcraft® Surpasses 11.5 Million Subscribers Worldwide. Blizzard Entertainment. http://www.blizzard.com/us/press/081121.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2008
  5. Castronova E (2001) Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier. CESifo Working Paper Series. CESifo GmbH, Munich. http://www.cesifogroup.de/DocCIDL/618.PDF
  6. Castronova E (2008) A test of the law of demand in a virtual world: exploring the petri dish approach to social science. CESifo working paper series. CESifo GmbH, MunichGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerrato M, Sarantis N (2007) Does purchasing power parity hold in emerging markets? Evence from a panel of black market exchange rates. Int J Finance Econ 12(4): 427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesney T, Chuah S-H, Hoffmann R (2009) Virtual world experimentation: an exploratory study. j econ behavior organization 72(1):618–635. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505559/description#description
  9. Dumas B (1992) Dynamic equilibrium and the real exchange rate in a spatially separated world. Review of Financial Studies 5(2):153–180. http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org
  10. Engel C, Rogers JH (1994) How We is the Border? NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer C (2009) Price Convergence in the EMU? Evence from Micro Data. Discussion paper series 1: economic studies. Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  12. Guðmundsson E (2007) Quarterly Economic Newsletter. CCPGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallwood CP, MacDonald R (2000) International money and finance. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes MJ (2007) How convergent are regional house prices in the United Kingdom? Some new evidence from panel data unit root testing. J Econ Soc Res 9(1): 1–17Google Scholar
  15. Lafrance R, Lawrence S (2002) Purchasing power parity: definition, measurement and interpretation. Bank Can Rev 2002: 27–33Google Scholar
  16. Phillips PCB, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6): 1771–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations