Comparison of SML and GMM estimators for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data
- First Online:
- 330 Downloads
A simulated maximum likelihood (SML) estimator for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data is found to be more efficient than the widely used generalized method of moments estimator (GMM) of Berry et al. (Econometrica 63:841–890, 1995). In particular, the SML estimator is better than the GMM estimator in recovery of heterogeneity parameters which are often of central interest in marketing research. With the GMM estimator, the analyst must determine what moment conditions to use for parameter identification, especially the heterogeneity parameters. With the SML estimator, the moment conditions are automatically determined as the gradients of the log-likelihood function, and these are the most efficient ones if the model is correctly specified. Another limitation of the GMM estimator is that the product market shares must be strictly positive while the SML estimator can handle zero market share observations. Properties of the SML and GMM estimators are demonstrated in simulated data and in data from the US photographic film market.
KeywordsRandom coefficients Logit model Endogeneity Heterogeneity Simulated maximum likelihood Generalized method of moments
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ackerberg D, Benkard CL, Berry S, Pakes A (2007) Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer EE Handbook of econometrics vol 6, part 1. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Berry S, Linton OB, Pakes A (2004) Limit theorems for estimating the parameters of differentiated product demand systems. Rev Econ Stud 71(248): 613–654Google Scholar
- Hausman J (1983) Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models. In: Griliches Z, Intriligator M (eds) Handbook of econometrics, vol 1. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Keane MP (1993) Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent variables. In: Rao CR, Maddala GS, Vinod D (eds) The handbook of statistics & econometrics. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 545–572Google Scholar
- Petrin A, Train K (2004) Omitted product attributes in discrete choice models. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge JM (2001) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar