Empirical Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 1079–1095 | Cite as

Cigarette demand and effectiveness of U.S. smoking control policies: state-level evidence for more than half a century

  • Rajeev K. Goel
  • Michael A. NelsonEmail author


Using state-level U.S. data over 1956–2008 this paper examines the demand for cigarettes. The long data span enables us to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of various policies and to examine cigarette demand across individual states. Our results show cigarette demand to be price inelastic, smoking-habit effects to be strong, income effects to be small, and border price effects can be significant. These findings are quite robust across alternate model specifications. None of the three smoking control policies considered (Fairness Doctrine, Broadcast Ban, and Master Settlement Agreement) were shown to be effective in curbing overall smoking, although most were effective in a few states. Policy implications are discussed.


Cigarettes Smoking Master Settlement Agreement Elasticity Demand 

JEL Classification

D12 I18 H20 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adda J, Cornaglia F (2010) The effect of bans and taxes on passive smoking. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR): (1985) Cigarette tax evasion: a second look. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1986) Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev Econ Stat 68: 148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1992) Cigarette taxation: raising revenues and reducing consumption. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 3: 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KM (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Am Econ Rev 84: 396–418Google Scholar
  6. Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J Polit Econ 96: 675–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhargava A (1991) Estimating short and long run income elasticities of foods and nutrients for rural south India. J R Stat Soc Ser A 154: 157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaloupka FJ (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J Polit Econ 99: 722–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE (2000) The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1539–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connelly RT, Goel RK, Ram R (2009) Demand for cigarettes in the United States: effects of prices in bordering states and contiguity with Mexico and Canada. Appl Econ 41: 2255–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Liu F (2008) Excise tax avoidance: the case of state cigarette taxes. In: Working Paper.
  12. Devereux MP, Lockwood B, Redoano M (2007) Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: theory and some evidence from the USA. J Public Econ 91: 451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fields G (2009) States go to war on cigarette smuggling. Wall Street July 20: A6Google Scholar
  14. Fleenor P (1996) Tax differential on the interstate smuggling and cross-border sales of cigarettes in the United States. In: Tax Foundation background paper No. 26.
  15. Gallet CA (2003) Advertising and restrictions in the cigarette industry: evidence of state-by-state variation. Contemp Econ Policy 21: 338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallet CA, List JA (2003) Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 12: 821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goel RK (2004) Cigarette demand in Canada and the U.S.—Canadian cigarette smuggling. Appl Econ Lett 11: 537–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goel RK, Morey MJ (1995) The interdependence of cigarette and liquor demand. South Econ J 62: 451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goel RK, Nelson MA (2008) Global efforts to combat smoking. Ashgate Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  20. Goel RK, Ram R (2004) Quantile-regression estimates of cigarette demand elasticities for the United States. J Econ Finance 28: 413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes JE, Knittel CR, Sperling D (2008) Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. In: Working Paper University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanoie P, Leclair P (1998) Taxation or regulation: looking for a good anti-smoking policy. Econ Lett 58: 85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson MA (2002) Using excise taxes to finance state government: do neighboring state taxation policy and cross-border markers matter?. J Reg Sci 42: 731–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orzechowski, Walker (various years) The tax burden on tobacco: historical compilation. Orzechowski and Walker, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Saffer H, Chaloupka F (2000) The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ 19: 1117–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaffer ME (2010) XTIVREG2: Stata module to perform extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class regression for panel data models.
  27. Sung HY, Hu TW, Keeler TE (1994) Cigarette taxation and demand: an empirical model. Contemp Econ Policy 12: 91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United States Surgeon General (1964) Smoking and health. USGPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. United States Surgeon General (1967) The health consequences of smoking. A public health service review. USGPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: (2000) Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  31. Viscusi WK (2002) Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Viscusi WK, Hersch J (2009) Tobacco regulation through litigation: the Master Settlement Agreement. In: Working Paper, NBER, No. 15422Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations