Empirical Economics

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 7–24 | Cite as

One date, one break?

  • Michail Karoglou
  • Panicos Demetriades
  • Siong Hook Law
Article

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the conventional approach of using official liberalisation dates as the only existing breakdates could lead to inaccurate conclusions as to the effect of the underlying liberalisation policies. It also proposes an alternative paradigm for obtaining more robust estimates of volatility changes around official liberalisation dates and/or other important market events. By focusing on five East Asian emerging markets, all of which liberalised their financial markets in the late, and by using recent advances in the econometrics of structural change, it shows that (i) the detected breakdates in the volatility of stock market returns can be dramatically different to official liberalisation dates and (ii) the use of official liberalisation dates as breakdates can readily entail inaccurate inference. In contrast, the use of data-driven techniques for the detection of multiple structural changes leads to a richer and inevitably more accurate pattern of volatility evolution emerges in comparison with focussing on official liberalisation dates.

Keywords

Financial liberalisation Volatility Structural changes Breaks 

JEL Classification

C22 C51 G15 G32 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiad A, Mody A (2005) Financial reform: what shakes it? What shapes it?. Am Econ Rev 95(1): 66–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen F, Gale D (2000) Bubbles and crises. Econ J 110(460): 36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreou E, Ghysels E (2002) Multiple breaks in financial market volatility dynamics. J Appl Econom 70: 9–38Google Scholar
  4. Arestis P, Demetriades PO (1997) Financial development and economic growth: assessing the evidence. Econ J 107(442): 783–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arestis P, Demetriades PO (1999) Financial liberalization: the experience of developing countries. East Econ J East Econ Assoc 25(4): 441–457Google Scholar
  6. Arestis P, Demetriades PO (2001) Financial development and economic growth: the role of stock markets. J Money Credit Bank 33(1): 16–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauwens L, Preminger A, Rombouts J (2006) Regime switching GARCH models, discussion paper (SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=914144)
  8. Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1997) Emerging equity market volatility. J Financ Econ 43(1): 29–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekaert G, Harvey CR (2000) Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. J Finance 55: 565–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharya U, Daouk H (2002) The world price of insider trading. J Finance 57: 75–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollerslev Tim (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 31: 307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuñado J, Biscarri JG, de Gracia FP (2006) Changes in the dynamic behavior of emerging market volatility: revisiting the effects of financial liberalization. Emerg Markets Rev 7: 261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Santis G, Imrohoroglu S (1997) Stock returns and volatility in emerging financial markets. J Int Money Finance 16: 561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demetriades PO, Luintel KB (2001) Financial restraints in the South Korean miracle. J Dev Econ 64(2): 459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Den Haan WJ, Levin A (1998) Vector autoregressive covariance matrix estimation, manuscript. University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs-Schundeln N, Funke N (2001) Stock market liberalisation: financial and macroeconomic implications, IMF Working Paper WP/01/193Google Scholar
  17. Henry PB (2000) Stock market liberalisation, economic reform, and emerging market equity prices. J Finance 55: 529–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hwang S, Pereira PV (2006) Small sample properties of GARCH estimates and persistence. Eur J Finance 12(6-7): 473–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inclàn C, Tiao GC (1994) Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayasuriya S (2005) Stock market liberalization and volatility in the presence of favourable market characteristics and institutions. Emerg Markets Rev 6: 170–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judge GG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Ltkepohl H, Lee T-C (1985) The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Karoglou M (2010) Breaking down the non-normality of stock returns. Eur J Finance 16(1): 79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karoglou M (2009) Stock market efficiency before and after a financial liberalisation reform: do breaks in volatility dynamics matter?. J Emerg Market Finance 8(3): 315–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karoglou M (2006a) On the detection of structural changes in volatility dynamics with applications. PhD Thesis, University of Leicester, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  25. Karoglou M (2006b) The size and power of the CUSUM-type tests in detecting structural changes in financial markets volatility dynamics, mimeograph. University of Leicester, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  26. Kassimatis K (2002) Financial liberalisation and stock market volatility in selected developing countries. Appl Financ Econ 12: 389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keynes JM (1964) The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim EH, Singal V (2000) Stock market openings: experience of emerging economies. J Bus 73: 25–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kokoska P, Leipus R (1999) Testing for parameter changes in ARCH models. Lith Math J 39: 231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kokoszka P, Leipus R (2000) Change-point estimation in ARCH models, Bernoulli 6Google Scholar
  31. Lamoureux CG, Lastrapes WD (1990) Persistence in variance, structural change and the GARCH model. J Bus Econ Stat 8: 225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levene H (1960) In contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. In: Olkin I et al (eds) Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell H, McKenzie MD (2003) ‘GARCH model selection criteria. Quant Finance 3: 262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newey W, West K (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3): 703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pagan A, Schwert W (1990) Alternative models for conditional stock volatility. J Econ 45: 267–290Google Scholar
  36. Santis GD, Imrohoroglu S (1997) Stock returns and volatility in emerging financial markets. J Int Money Finance 16: 561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sansó A, Aragó V, Carrion JL (2003) Testing for changes in the unconditional variance of financial time series. Department d’ Economia Aplicada working paper. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Universitat de les illes BalearsGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheskin DJ (1997) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Siegel S, Tukey JW (1960) A nonparametric sum of ranks procedures for relative spread in unpaired samples. J Am Stat Assoc 55: 429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh A (1997) Financial liberalisation, the stockmarket and economic development. Econ J 107(442): 771–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singh A (2003) Capital account liberalisation, free long-term capital flows, financial crises and economic development. East Econ J 29(2): 191–216Google Scholar
  42. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Tauchen GE, Pitts M (1983) The price variability–volume relationship on speculative markets. Econometrica 51: 485–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michail Karoglou
    • 1
  • Panicos Demetriades
    • 2
  • Siong Hook Law
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity Putra MalaysiaSerdang, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations