Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Instrumental variable estimation of a nonlinear Taylor rule

  • Zisimos Koustas
  • Jean-François LamarcheEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article studies nonlinear, threshold, models in which some of the regressors can be endogenous. An estimation strategy based on instrumental variables was originally developed for dynamic panel models and we extend it to time series models. We apply this methodology to a forward-looking Taylor rule, where nonlinearity is introduced via inflation thresholds.

Keywords

Thresholds Nonlinear models Instrumental variables Taylor rule 

JEL Classification

C22 C12 C13 C87 E58 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An S, Schorfheide F (2007) Bayesian analyis of DSGE models. Econom Rev 26: 113–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews D, Monahan J (1992) An improved heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimator. Econometrica 60: 953–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andros K, Stengos T, Tan CM (2009) Structural threshold regression. Working paper 2009-7, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunzel H, Enders W (2005) Is the Taylor rule missing? a statistical investigation. Working paper 05015, Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Caner M, Hansen B (2001) Threshold autoregression with a unit root. Econometrica 69: 1555–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caner M, Hansen B (2004) Instrumental variable estimation of a threshold model. Econom Theory 20: 813–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan K (1993) Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. Ann Stat 21: 520–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (1998) Monetary policy rules in practice: some international evidence. Eur Econ Rev 42: 1033–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. Q J Econ 115: 147–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochrane J (2007) Identification with Taylor rules: a critical review. Tech. rep. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson R, MacKinnon J (2003) Econometric theory and methods. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolado J, Maria-Dolores R, Naveira M (2005) Are monetary policy reaction functions asymmetric?: The role of nonlinearity in the Phillips curve. Eur Econ Rev 49: 485–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doornik J (2007) Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox, 3rd edn. Timberlake Consultants Press, Oxford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Estima (2006) RATS Version 6.2 user’s guide. EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamber E, Sinclair T, Stekler H, Reid E (2008) Multivariate forecast errors and the Taylor rule. Working paper 2008-002, George Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen B (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64: 413–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen B (2000) Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica 68: 575–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen L, Heaton J, Yaron A (1996) Finite-sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. J Bus Econ Stat 14: 262–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inoue A, Rossi B (2008) Testing for weak identification in possibly nonlinear models. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  20. Inoue A, Shintani M (2006) Bootstrapping GMM estimators for time series. J Econom 133: 531–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleibergen F (2005) Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified. Econometrica 73: 1103–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin C, Milas C (2004) Modelling monetary policy: inflation targeting in practice. Economica 71: 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mavroeidis S (2008) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: some new evidence. Tech. rep., Brown University (Forthcoming in the American Economic Review)Google Scholar
  24. Molodtsova T, Nikolsko-Rzevskyy A, Papell D (2008) Taylor rules with real-time data: a tale of two countries and one exchange rate. J Monet Econ 55: 563–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson E (2001) UK monetary policy 1972–1997: a guide using Taylor rules. Working paper 2931, CEPR discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  26. Newey W, West K (1987) A simple positive semidefinite, heteroskedastic and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newey W, West K (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61: 631–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nikolsko-Rzevskyy A (2009) Monetary policy evaluation in real time: forward-looking Taylor rules without forward-looking data. Working paper, University of MemphisGoogle Scholar
  29. Orphanides A (2001) Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. Am Econ Rev 91: 964–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orphanides A (2003) Historical monetary policy analysis and the Taylor rule. J Monet Econ 50: 983–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orphanides A, Wilcox D (2002) An opportunistic approach to disinflation. Int Fin 5: 47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sargan J (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26: 393–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stock JH, Wright J (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68: 1055–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Surico P (2007) The fed’s monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: the case of asymmetric preferences. J Econ Dyn Control 31: 305–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor J (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf Ser Public Policy 39: 195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor J (1999) The robustness and efficiency of monetary policy rules as guidelines for interest rate setting by the European central bank. J Monet Econ 43: 655–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor M, Davradakis E (2006) Interest rate setting and inflation targeting: evidence of a nonlinear taylor rule for the united kingdom. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 10(4): 1–18Google Scholar
  38. Terasvirta T (1994) Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations