Empirical Economics

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 841–864 | Cite as

Body mass index in families: spousal correlation, endogeneity, and intergenerational transmission



Previous studies have documented spousal and intergenerational correlations in body mass index (BMI) but few have considered familial weight data augmented with socioeconomic and behavioral control variables. This article considers a U.S. dataset that contains such information on husbands, wives, and grown children. Although certain variables (like education, race, and smoking status) are helpful in explaining an individual’s BMI, the BMI of one’s spouse (or parents) remains the most significant predictor of BMI. To help distinguish between correlation and causality in the married-adult BMI regressions, we consider two alternative approaches for dealing with possible endogeneity (due to omitted variables): (1) including spousal variables to proxy for omitted variables and (2) modeling spousal BMI in a hierarchical framework to explicitly allow for a “couple” effect. The results suggest endogeneity of educational attainment, but not smoking status, and support prior research that finds different associations of BMI with income for husbands and wives. For grown children, parental BMI and smoking status are identified as significant predictors.


Body mass index Endogeneity Familial correlation 

JEL Classification

I10 I12 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson PM, Butcher KF, Levine PB (2003) Maternal employment and overweight children. J Health Econ 22: 477–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cawley J (2004) The impact of obesity on wages. J Hum Resour 39: 452–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cawley J, Markowitz S, Tauras J (2004) Lighting up and slimming down: the effects of body weight and cigarette prices on adolescent smoking initiation. J Health Econ 23: 293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Center for Studying Health System Change (2005) Community Tracking Study 2003 Household Survey Public Use File: user’s guide. Technical Publication No. 58. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlain G (1982) Multivariate regression models for panel data. J Econ 18: 5–46Google Scholar
  6. Chou S-Y, Grossman M, Saffer H (2004) An economic analysis of adult obesity: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Health Econ 23: 565–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Classen T, Hokayem C (2005) Childhood influences on youth obesity. Econ Hum Biol 3: 165–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conley D, Glauber R (2006) Gender, body mass and socioeconomic status: new evidence from the PSID. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 17: 255–280Google Scholar
  9. Cutler DM, Glaeser EL, Shapiro JM (2003) Why have Americans become more obese?. J Econ Perspect 17: 93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G (2004) State-level estimates of annual medical expenditures attributable to obesity. Obes Res 12: 18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. J Am Med Assoc 288: 1723–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruber J, Frakes M (2006) Does falling smoking lead to rising obesity?. J Health Econ 25: 183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffery RW, Rick AM (2002) Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between body mass index and marriage-related factors. Obes Res 10: 809–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lakdawalla D, Philipson T (2009) The growth of obesity and technological change. Econ Hum Biol 7: 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maes HHM, Neale MC, Eaves LJ (1997) Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behav Genet 27: 325–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manson JE, Skerrett PJ, Willett WC (2004) Obesity as a risk factor for major health outcomes. In: Bray GA, Bouchard C (eds) Handbook of obesity: etiology and pathophysiology, 2nd edn. pp 813–824. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=t-Ccv0QGmeAC
  17. Metcalf CE, Kemper P, Kohn LT, Pickreign JD (1996) Site definition and sample design for the Community Tracking Study. Center for Studying Health System Change, Technical Publication No. 1. Washington, DC. Available at http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/157/157.pdf
  18. Philipson TJ, Posner RA (2003) The long-run growth in obesity as a function of technological change. Perspect Biol Med 46: S87–S107Google Scholar
  19. Price RA, Reed DR, Guido NJ (2000) Resemblance for body mass index in families of obese African American and European American women. Obes Res 8: 360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rice T, Despres JP, Daw EW, Gagnon J, Borecki IB, Perusse L, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Rao DC, Bouchard C (1997) Familial resemblance for abdominal visceral fat: the HERITAGE family study. Int J Obes 21: 1024–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sacerdote B (2004) What happens when we randomly assign children to families? NBER working paper 10894Google Scholar
  22. Stunkard AJ, Sorensen TI, Hanis C, Teasdale TW, Chakraborty R, Schull WJ, Schulsinger F (1986) An adoption study of human obesity. N Engl J Med 314: 193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taveras EM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Berkey CS, Rockett HRH, Field AE, Lindsay Frazier A, Colditz GA, Gillman MW (2005) Family dinner and adolescent overweight. Obes Res 13: 900–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vogler GP, Sorensen TI, Stunkard AJ, Srinivasan MR, Rao DC (1995) Influences of genes and shared family environment on adult body mass index assessed in an adoption study by a comprehensive path model. Int J Obes 19: 40–45Google Scholar
  25. Wilson SE (2002) The health capital of families: an investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status. Soc Sci Med 55: 1157–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson FA (2006) Explaining the growth of child obesity in the U. S. University of Chicago Department of Economics, mimeo. Available at http://chess.uchicago.edu/ccehpe/hew_papers/winter_2006/Wilson%202006.pdf
  27. Wolf AM, Colditz GA (1998) Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obes Res 6: 97–106Google Scholar
  28. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. World Health Organization (2003) Obesity and overweight: fact sheet. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/media/en/gsfs_obesity.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2005

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Stillman School of BusinessSeton Hall UniversitySouth OrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations