Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 189–229 | Cite as

Can income support for part-time workers serve as a stepping-stone to regular jobs? An application to young long-term unemployed women

  • Bart Cockx
  • Christian Goebel
  • Stéphane Robin
Article

Abstract

This article investigates whether income support for low-paid part-time workers in Belgium increases the transition from unemployment to non-subsidised, ‘regular’ employment. Our analysis uses a sample of long-term unemployed young women. Observing their labour market histories from 1998 to 2001, we implement the ‘timing of events’ method to identify the treatment effect. Our results suggest that participation in the policy has a significantly positive effect on the transition to regular employment. Participation reduced the survivor rate in unemployment by 27% points 1 year after the start of the programme. The time spent in the programme did not affect the transition to regular employment.

Keywords

Active labour market policies Evaluation Mixed proportional Hazard models 

JEL Classification

J64 J68 C41 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2003) The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models. Econometrica 71: 1491–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2004) Analyzing the effect of dynamically assigned treatments using duration models, binary treatment models, and panel data models. Empir Econ 29(1): 5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbring JH, van den Berg GJ (2005) Social experiments and instrumental variables with duration outcomes. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2005-047/3Google Scholar
  4. Autor DH, Houseman SN (2005) Do temporary help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers? Evidence from random assignments. Uppjohn Institute Staff Working Paper No. 05-124, Uppjohn Institute, KalamazooGoogle Scholar
  5. Blank RM (1998) Labor market dynamics and part-time work. In: Polachek SW (eds) Research in labor economics, vol 17. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 57–93Google Scholar
  6. Blundell R, Hoynes HW (2003) Has “in-work” benefit reform helped the labor market?. In: Card D, Blundell R, Freeman RB (eds) Seeking a premier economy: the economic effects of British economic reforms, 1980–2000. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Blundell R, Costa Dias M, Meghir C, Van Reenen J (2004) Evaluating the employment impact of a mandatory search program. J Eur Econ Assoc 2: 569–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonnal L, Fougère D, Sérandon A (1994) L’impact des dispositifs d’emploi sur le devenir des jeunes chômeurs: une évaluation économétrique sur données longitudinales. Economie et Prévision, No. 115, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  9. Bonnal L, Fougère D, Sérandon A (1997) Evaluation the impact of French employment policies on individual labour market histories. Rev Econ Stud 64: 683–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth AL, Francesconi M, Frank J (2002) Temporary jobs: stepping-stones or dead ends?.  Econ J 112: 189–215Google Scholar
  11. Brinch C (2007) Non-parametric identification of the mixed hazard model with time-varying covariates. Econom Theory 23(2): 349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buddelmeyer H, Mourre G, Ward-Warmedinger M (2005) Part-time work in EU countries—labour market mobility, entry and exit. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No. 460Google Scholar
  13. Burtless G (1985) Are targeted wage subsidies harmful? Evidence from a wage voucher experiment. Ind Labor Relat Rev 39(1): 105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cahuc P (2002) A quoi sert la prime pour l’emploi?.  Revue française d’Economie 16: 3–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calmfors L (1994) Active labor market policy and unemployment—a framework for the analysis of crucial design features. OECD Econ Stud 22: 7–47Google Scholar
  16. Card D, Hyslop DR (2005) Estimating the effects of a time-limited earnings subsidy for welfare-leavers. Econometrica 73(6): 1723–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Card D, Michalopoulos C, Robins PK (2001) Measuring wage growth among former welfare recipients. Working Paper, Gouvernement du Canada/Human Resources DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  18. Chamberlain G (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev Econ Stud 47: 225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cockx B, Picchio M (2009) Are short-lived jobs stepping stones to long-lasting jobs? IZA Discussion Paper Series, DP No. 4007, BonnGoogle Scholar
  20. Cockx B, Ridder G (2001) Social employment of welfare recipients in Belgium: an evaluation. Econ J 111: 322–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crépon B, Dejemeppe M, Gurgand M (2005) Counseling the unemployed: does it lower unemployment duration and recurrence? IZA Discussion Paper Series, DP No. 1796, BonnGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Addio A, Rosholm M (2005) Exits from temporary jobs in Europe: a competing risks analysis. Labour Econ 12: 449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Greef I (2000) Les pièges financiers en Belgique: Aperçu de la législation du chômage, des spécificités institutionnelles et études de cas types. Revue Belge de Sécurité Sociale 42(2): 265–327Google Scholar
  24. Dubin JA, Rivers D (1993) Experimental estimates of the impact of wage subsidies. J Econom 56(1/2): 219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dustmann C, Meghir C (2005) Wages, experience and seniority. Rev Econ Stud 72: 77–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eissa N, Hoynes HW (2006) Behavioral responses to taxes: lessons from the EITC and labor supply. In: Poterba J (eds) Tax policy and the economy, vol 20. NBER, Cambridge, pp 73–110Google Scholar
  27. Eurostat (2006) EC economic data pocket book 4-05. European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
  28. Farber HS (1999) Alternative and part-time employment arrangements as a response to job loss. J Labor Econ Part 2 17(4): S142–S169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Francesconi M, Vander Klaauw W (2007) The socioeconomic consequences of ‘in-work’ benefit reform for British lone mothers. J Hum Resour 42(1): 1–31Google Scholar
  30. Gagliarducci S (2005) The dynamics of repeated temporary jobs. Labour Econ 12: 429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaure S, Roed K, Zhang T (2007) Time and causality: a Monte Carlo assessment of the timing-of-events approach. J Econom 141: 1159–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gerfin M, Lechner M, Steiger H (2005) Does subsidised temporary employment get the unemployed back to work? An econometric analysis of two different schemes. Labour Econ 12(6): 807–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gladden T, Taber C (2000) Wage progression among less skilled workers. In: Card D, Blank RM (eds) Finding jobs: work and welfare reform. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Granier P, Joutard X (1999) L’activité réduite favorise-t-elle la sortie du chômage?.  Economie et Statistique No. 321–322(1/2): 133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grogger J (2009) Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages: using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias. Rev Econ Stat 91(3): 490–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardoy I, Schøne P (2006) The part-time wage gap in Norway: how large is it really?.  Br J Ind Relat 44(2): 263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirsch B (2005) Why do part-time workers earn less? The role of worker and job skills. Ind Labor Relat Rev 58(4): 525–551Google Scholar
  38. Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52: 271–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heckman J, Lochner L, Taber C (1998) General equilibrium treatment effects: a study of tuition policy. Am Econ Rev 88(2): 381–386Google Scholar
  40. Jepsen M, O’Dorchai S, Plasman R, Rycx F (2005) The wage penalty induced by part-time work: the case of Belgium. Bruss Econ Rev 48(1/2): 73–94Google Scholar
  41. Kvasnicka M (2008) Does Temporary Help Work Provide a Stepping Stone to Regular Employment? NBER Working Papers, No. 13843Google Scholar
  42. Kyrrä T (2008) Partial unemployment insurance benefits and the transition rate to regular work. VATT Discussion Paper, 440. Government Institute of Economic Research, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyrrä T, Parrotta P, Rosholm M (2009) The effect of receiving supplementary UI benefits on unemployment duration. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 3920. IZA, BonnGoogle Scholar
  44. Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Larssen L, Lindqvist L, Nordström Skans O (2005) Stepping-stones or dead-ends: an analysis of Swedish replacement contracts. IFAU Working Paper, No. 2005-18. IFAU, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindsay BG (1983) The geometry of mixture likelihoods: a general theory. Ann Stat 11: 86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ma CA, Weiss A (1993) A signalling theory of unemployment. Eur Econ Rev 37: 135–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manning A, Petrongolo B (2008) The part-time pay penalty for women in Britain. Econ J 118(526): F28–F51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mc Call B (1996) Unemployment insurance rules, joblessness, and part-time work. Econometrica 64: 647–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mc Call B (1997) The determinants of full-time versus part-time reemployment following displacement. J Labor Econ 15(4): 714–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCormick B (1990) A theory of signalling during job search, employment, efficiency, and “stigmatised” jobs. Rev Econ Stud 57: 299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meghir C, Whitehouse E (1996) The evolution of wages in the UK: evidence from micro data. J Labor Econ 14(1): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyer BD (1995) Lessons from the U.S. unemployment insurance experiments. J Econ Lit 33: 91–131Google Scholar
  54. Richardson K, Van den Berg GJ (2008) Duration dependence versus unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects: Swedish labor market training and the duration of unemployment. IFAU Discussion Paper, No. 7, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  55. Ridder G (1984) The distribution of single-spell duration data. In: Neumann GR, Westergård NC (eds) Studies in labor market dynamics. Springer, Darmstadt, pp 45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodgers JR (2004) Hourly wages of full-time and part-time employees in Australia. Aust J Labour Econ 7(2): 231–254Google Scholar
  57. Van den Berg GJ (2001) Durationmodels: specification, identification, andmultiple durations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer EHandbook of econometrics, vol V. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Ours JC (2004) The locking-in effect of subsidized jobs. J Comp Econ 32/1: 37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  60. Zijl M, Van den Berg G, Heyma A (2004) Stepping stones for the unemployed: the effect of temporary jobs on the duration until regular work. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 1241. IZA, BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart Cockx
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Christian Goebel
    • 6
  • Stéphane Robin
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.SHERPPA, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  2. 2.IZABonnGermany
  3. 3.CESIfoMunichGermany
  4. 4.BETAUniversity of StrasbourgStrasbourg CedexFrance
  5. 5.IRES, UCLouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  6. 6.Centre for European Economic Research, ZEWMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations