Empirical Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 329–354 | Cite as

Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export

Original Paper

Abstract

This article provides an empirical analysis of the effects of new product versus process innovations on export propensity at the firm level. Product innovation is a key factor for successful market entry in models of creative destruction and Schumpeterian growth. Process innovation helps securing a firm’s market position given the characteristics of its product supply. Both modes of innovation are expected to raise a firm’s propensity to export. According to new trade theory, we conjecture that product innovation is relatively more important in that regard. We investigate these hypotheses in a rich survey panel data set with information about new innovations of either type. With a set of indicators regarding innovation motives and impediments and continuous variables at the firm and industry level at hand, we may determine the probability of launching new innovations and their impact on export propensity at the firm level through a double treatment approach.

Keywords

Product innovation Process innovation Propensity to export Multiple treatment effects estimation 

JEL Classification

F1 O3 L1 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

181_2009_322_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (177 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 176 kb)

References

  1. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76: 1537–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkeson A, Burstein A (2007) Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade. NBER working paper no. 13326Google Scholar
  3. Aw BY, Roberts MJ, Winston T (2007) Export market participation, investments in R&D and worker training, and the evolution of firm productivity. World Econ 14: 83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aw BY, Roberts MJ, Xu DY (2009) R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. NBER working paper no. 14670Google Scholar
  5. Baily MN, Gersbach H (1995) Efficiency in manufacturing and the need for global competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp 307–358Google Scholar
  6. Basile R (2001) Export behavior of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation. Res Policy 30: 1185–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker SO, Wohlrabe K (2008) Micro data at the ifo institute for economic research-f́b-the “ifo business survey”—usage and access. Schmollers Jahrbuch 128: 307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard A, Jensen JB (1997) Exporters, skill upgrading, and the wage gap. J Int Econ 42: 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernard A, Jensen JB (1999) Exceptional export performance: cause, effect, or both?. J Int Econ 47: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: the effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND J Econ 31(3): 549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braunerhjelm P (1996) The relation between firm specific intangibles and exports. Econ Lett 53: 213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassiman B, Martínez-Ros E (2007) Innovation and exports: evidence from Spanish manufacturing. Unpublished manuscript, IESE Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev Econ Stat 78: 232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Constantini JA, Melitz MJ (2008) The dynamics of firm-level adjustment to trade liberalization. In: Helpman E, Marin D, Verdier T (eds) The organization of firms in a global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Dehejia RH, Wahba S (1999) Causal effects in non-experimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programmes. J Am Stat Assoc 94: 1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat 84: 151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dollar D (1986) Technological innovation, capital mobility, and the product cycle in North-South trade. Am Econ Rev 76: 177–190Google Scholar
  18. Ebling G, Janz N (1999) Export and innovation activities in the German service sector. Empirical evidence at the firm level. ZEW discussion paper no. 99–53, Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  19. Entorf H, Krader W, Pohlmeier W (1988) Entscheidungen über Innovation, Beschäftigung und Außenhandel: Empirische Ergebnisse eines simultanen Probitansatzes. In: Kräger H (eds) Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Heinz König zum 60. Frankfurt am Main, Geburtstag, pp 27–47Google Scholar
  20. Fitzenberger B (1998) The moving blocks bootstrap and robust inference for linear least squares and quantile regressions. J Econ 82: 235–287Google Scholar
  21. Flaig G, Stadler M (1994) Success breeds success. The dynamics of the innovation process. Empir Econ 19: 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foellmi R, Zweimüller J (2006) Mass consumption, exclusion, and unemployment. University of Zurich IEW working paper no. 296Google Scholar
  23. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1989) Product development and international trade. J Political Econ 97: 1261–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1990) Comparative advantage and long-run growth. Am Econ Rev 80: 796–815Google Scholar
  25. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Grossman GM, Helpman E, Szeidl A (2006) Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. J Int Econ 70: 216–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from a job training programme. Rev Econ Stud 64: 605–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65: 261–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman JJ, LaLonde RJ, Smith JA (1999) The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol III. Elsevier, New York, pp 1865–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirsch S, Bijaoui I (1985) R&D Intensity and export performance: a micro view. Weltwirtsch Arch 121: 138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hopenhayn HA (1992) Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica 60: 1127–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes KS (1986) Exports and innovation. Eur Econ Rev 30: 383–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iacovone L, Javorcik BS (2007) Getting ready: preparation for exporting. Unpublished manuscript, Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen R, Thursby M (1987) A decision theoretic model of innovation, technology transfer, and trade. Rev Econ Stud 54: 631–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jovanovic B (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar N, Siddharthan NS (1994) Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries: the case of Indian enterprise. J Dev Stud 32: 288–309Google Scholar
  37. Lachenmaier S, Wößmann LW (2006) Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Econ Pap 58: 317–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lachenmaier S, Rottmann H (2007) Employment effects of innovation at the firm level. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 227: 254–272Google Scholar
  39. Leamer EE, Levinsohn J (1995) International trade theory: the evidence. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) The handbook of international economics, vol III. Elsevier, New York, pp 1339–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lechner M (2001) Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In: Lechner M, Pfeiffer F (eds) Econometric evaluation of labor market policies, vol 13. ZEW Econ Stud, , pp 43–58Google Scholar
  41. Lee M-J (2005) Micro-econometrics for policy, program and treatment effects. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lileeva A, Trefler D (2007) Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity...for some plants. NBER working paper no. 13297Google Scholar
  43. Martin S (1993) Endogenous firm efficiency in a Cournot principal-agent model. J Econ Theory 59: 445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peters B (2007) Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence. J Tech Transf 34: 226–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Politis DN, Romano JP, Wolf M (1999) Subsampling. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roper S, Love JH (2002) Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Res Policy 31: 1087–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39: 33–38Google Scholar
  49. Schlegelmilch BB, Crook JN (1988) Firm-level determinants of export intensity. Manag Decis Econ 9: 291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Segerstrom PS, Anant TCA, Dinopoulos E (1990) A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 80: 1077–1091Google Scholar
  51. Smith JA, Todd PE (2005) Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?. J Econ 125: 305–353Google Scholar
  52. Smolny W (1998) Innovations, prices and employment, a theoretical model and an empirical application for West German manufacturing firms. J Ind Econ 46: 359–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smolny W, Schneeweis T (1999) Innovation, Wachstum und Beschäftigung. Eine empirische Untersucung auf Basis des ifo Unternehmenspanels. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 218: 453–472Google Scholar
  54. Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52: 101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spencer BJ, Brander JA (1983) International R&D rivalry and industrial strategy. Rev Econ Stud 50(4): 707–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagner J (1996) Export performance, human capital, and product innovation in Germany: a micro view. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften 47: 40–45Google Scholar
  57. Wakelin K (1997) Trade and innovation, theory and evidence. CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  58. Wakelin K (1998) Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Res Policy 26: 829–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stirling Management SchoolUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
  2. 2.KOF, ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations