Empirical Economics

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 523–554 | Cite as

State dependence and unobserved heterogeneity in the employment transitions of the over-50s

  • Lorenzo Cappellari
  • Richard Dorsett
  • Getinet Haile
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines employment transitions among men and women in the UK aged between 50 and the state pension age. We use a fourth order Markov model to estimate quarterly transitions while allowing for potential endogeneity of initial conditions. The results reject exogeneity of initial conditions and show the importance of state dependence. We compare the results to those obtained with a younger sample and find evidence of a sorting process over the life-cycle whereby men’s employment transitions are increasingly characterized by state dependence while, for women, unobserved heterogeneity becomes more important. We discuss some potential policy implications of the results.

Keywords

Labour market participation Transitions Over-50s UK 

JEL Classification

J14 J21 J64 

References

  1. Andrén T (2007) The persistence of welfare participation. IZA discussion paper 3100Google Scholar
  2. Arulampalam W, Booth A, Taylor M (2000) Unemployment persistence. Oxf Econ Pap 52: 24–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blundell R, Meghir C, Smith S (2002) Pension incentives and the pattern of early retirement. Econ J 112: C153–C170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean M (2003) Growing older in the 21st century. ESRC growing older program. Available via DIALOG. http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/GO_in_the_21st_Century_tcm6-5504.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2009
  5. Disney R, Emmerson C, Wakefield M (2006) Ill health and retirement in Britain: a panel data-based analysis. J Health Econ 25: 621–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DWP (2006) A new deal for welfare: empowering people to work. TSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Haardt D (2006) Transitions out of and back to employment among older men and women in the UK. ISER working paper 2006-20Google Scholar
  8. Hansen J, Lofstrom M and Zhang X (2006) State dependence in Canadian welfare participation. IZA discussion paper no. 2266Google Scholar
  9. Heckman J (1981) The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time—discrete data stochastic process. In: Manski C, McFadden D(eds) Structural analysis of discrete data with economic applications. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R, Lessof C, Nazroo J (eds) (2003) Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: the 2002 English longitudinal study of ageing. Institute for Fiscal Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Meghir C, Whitehouse E (1997) Labour market transitions and retirement of men in the UK. J Econom 79:327–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller C, Bewley H, Campbell-Barr V, Dorsett R, Hamilton G, Hoggart L, Homonoff T, Marsh A, Ray K, Riccio J, Vegeris S (2008) Implementation and second-year impacts for new deal 25 plus customers in the UK employment retention and advancement (ERA) demonstration. DWP research report 520Google Scholar
  14. OECD (2006) Live longer, work longer. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Riccio J, Bewley H, Campbell-Barr V, Dorsett R, Hamilton G, Hoggart L, Marsh A, Miller C, Ray K, Vegeris S (2008) Implementation and second-year impacts for lone parents in the UK employment retention and advancement (ERA) demonstration. DWP research report 489Google Scholar
  16. Stewart M (2007) The interrelated dynamics of unemployment and low pay. J Appl Econ 22: 511–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wooldridge J (2005) Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem for dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J Appl Econ 20: 39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Cappellari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Dorsett
    • 3
  • Getinet Haile
    • 2
  1. 1.Università CattolicaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Policy Studies InstituteLondonUK
  3. 3.National Institute of Economic and Social ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations