Analysis of product efficiency in the Korean automobile market from a consumer’s perspective
- 403 Downloads
In this study we develop and describe a conceptual and methodological framework to measure technical and allocative efficiency at the product level considering consumer choice, which encompasses overall efficiency. Empirically, we combined data envelopment analysis and a discrete choice model in order to measure efficiency levels. The suggested framework is applied to the Korean automobile market. The relationship between the level of efficiency and market performance is discussed in terms of market share.
KeywordsDEA Product efficiency Consumers utility Automobile market South Korea
JEL ClassificationC14 C25 D13 D61 L92
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J-F (1992) Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Kaiser U (2002) The effects of website provision on the demand for German women’s magazines. NBER working paper 8806Google Scholar
- Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC(eds) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lee J-D, Oh DH, Park CS (2004a) A nonparametric approach to measure the consumption efficiency in the price-characteristic space based on revealed preference theory. In: Paper presented at Asian Pacific productivity conference 2004, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- McFadden D (1973) Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P(eds) Frontiers in econometric. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Train KE (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar