Empirical Economics

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 251–274 | Cite as

Trust and growth: a shaky relationship

Original Paper

Abstract

We conduct an extensive robustness analysis of the relationship between trust and growth by investigating a later time period and a bigger sample than in previous studies. In addition to robustness tests that focus on model uncertainty, we systematize the investigation of outlier influence on the results by using the robust estimation technique Least Trimmed Squares. We find that when outliers (especially China) are removed, the trust-growth relationship is no longer robust. On average, the trust coefficient is half as large as in previous findings.

Keywords

Trust Growth Robustness Social capital Outliers 

JEL Classification

O40 Z13 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina A, Devleeschauwer A, Easterly W, Kurlat S and Wacziarg R (2003). Fractionalization. J Econ Growth 8: 155–194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A and La Ferrara E (2002). Who trusts others?. J Public Econ 85: 207–234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro RJ (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106: 407–443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro RJ (1997). Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  5. Barro RJ and Lee J-W (2001). International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxf Econ Pap 53: 541–563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berggren N and Jordahl H (2006). Free to trust: economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos 29: 141–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beugelsdijk S, de Groot HLF and Schaik ABTM van (2004). Trust and economic growth: a robustness analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 56: 118–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov C (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: a cross-country comparison. Public Choice 130: 1–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchan N and Croson R (2004). The boundaries of trust: own and others’ actions in the US and China. J Econ Behav Organ 55: 485–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Central Intelligence Agency (2004) The world factbook 2004. Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dasgupta P, Sergaldin I (eds) (2000) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia Google Scholar
  12. de la Fuente A and Domenech R (2006). Human capital in growth regressions: how much difference does data quality make?. J Eur Econ Assoc 4: 1–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollar D (1992). Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDC’s, 1976–85. Econ Dev Cult Change 40: 523–544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durlauf SN and Quah DT (1999). The new empirics of economic growth. In: Taylor, JB and Woodford, M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol. 1, pp 235–308. North Holland, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  15. Fernandez C, Ley E and Steel MFJ (2001). Model uncertainty in cross-country growth regressions. J Appl Econ 16: 563–576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Florax RJGM, de Groot HLF and Heijungs R (2002). The empirical economic growth literature: robustness, significance and size. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper 2002-040/03. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  17. Glaeser EL, Laibson DI, Scheinkman JA and Soutter CL (2000). Measuring trust. Q J Econ 115: 811–846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall RE and Jones CI (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. Q J Econ 114: 83–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2002) Penn world table version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP)Google Scholar
  20. Holz C (2003). How reliable are Chinese output and economic growth statistics?. China Q 173: 122–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hubert M, Rousseeuw PJ and Van Aelst S (2004). Robustness. In: Sundt, B and Teugels, J (eds) Encyclopedia of actuarial sciences, pp 1515–1529. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  22. Inglehart R (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. In: Warren, M (eds) Democracy and trust, pp 88–120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart R (2000). World values surveys and European values surveys, 1981–1984, 1990–1993 and 1995–1997, ICPSR study 2790. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart R, Basañez M, Diez-Medrano J, Halman L and Luijkx R (2004). Human beliefs and values: a cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Siglo XXI Editores, Mexico City Google Scholar
  25. King A (1991). Kuan-ksi and network building: a sociological interpretation. Daedalus 120: 63–84 Google Scholar
  26. Knack S and Keefer P (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ 112: 1251–1288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knack S and Zak PJ (2002). Building trust: public policy, interpersonal trust and economic development. Supreme Court Econ Rev 10: 91–107 Google Scholar
  28. Krueger AB and Lindahl M (2001). Education for growth: why and for whom?. J Econ Lit 39: 1101–1136 Google Scholar
  29. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Schleifer A and Vishny RW (1997). Trust in large organizations. Am Econ Rev 87: 333–338 Google Scholar
  30. Latinobarómetro (2004) http://www.latinobarometro.org
  31. Leamer EE (1985). Sensitivity analyses would help. Am Econ Rev 75: 308–313 Google Scholar
  32. Levine R and Renelt D (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. Am Econ Rev 82: 942–963 Google Scholar
  33. Lorgelly PK and Owen PD (1999). The effect of female and male schooling on economic growth in the Barro-Lee model. Empir Econ 24: 537–557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maddison A (1998). Chinese economic performance in the long run. OECD, Paris Google Scholar
  35. McCloskey DN (1985). The loss function has been mislaid: the rhetoric of significance tests. Am Econ Rev 75: 201–205 Google Scholar
  36. McCloskey DN and Ziliak ST (1996). The standard error of regressions. J Econ Lit 34: 97–14 Google Scholar
  37. Persson T and Tabellini G (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. The MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  38. Rawski TG (2001). What is happening to China’s GDP statistics?. China Econ Rev 12: 347–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ren R (1997). China’s economic performance in an international perspective. OECD, Paris Google Scholar
  40. Rousseeuw PJ (1984). Least median of squares regression. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 550–559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rousseeuw PJ and Leroy AM (1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  42. Rousseeuw PJ and Van Driessen K (2006). Computing LTS regression for large data sets. Data Min Knowl Discov 12: 29–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sala-i-Martin X (1997). I just ran two million regressions. Am Econ Rev 87: 178–183 Google Scholar
  44. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G and Miller RI (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Am Econ Rev 94: 813–835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sturm J-E and de Haan J (2001). How robust is the relationship between economic freedom and growth?. Appl Econ 33: 839–844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sturm J-E, de Haan J (2002) How robust is Sala-i-Martin’s robustness analysis? Mimeo. Department of Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  47. Sturm J-E and de Haan J (2005). Determinants of long-term growth: new results applying robust estimation and extreme bounds analysis?. Empir Econ 30: 597–617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Syrquin M, Chenery H (1998) Patterns of development, 1950–1983, World Bank discussion paper 41, World Bank, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  49. Temple J (1999). The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37: 112–156 Google Scholar
  50. Temple J (2001). Generalizations that aren’t? Evidence on education and growth. Eur Econ Rev 45: 905–918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. United Nations (2003) World urbanization prospects: the 2003 revision. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Uslaner EM (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  53. Verboven S and Hubert M (2005). LIBRA: A MATLAB library for robust analysis. Chem Intell Lab Syst 75: 127–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. World Bank (2001) World development indicators CD-rom. World Bank, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  55. Zak PJ and Knack S (2001). Trust and growth. Econ J 111: 295–321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaman A, Rousseeuw PJ and Orhan M (2001). Econometric applications of high-breakdown robust regression techniques. Econ Lett 71: 1–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN (2004) Size matters: the standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. Econ J Watch 1:331–358, http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/ZiliakMcCloskeyAugust2004.pdf Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niclas Berggren
    • 1
  • Mikael Elinder
    • 2
  • Henrik Jordahl
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.The Research Institute of Industrial EconomicsStockholmSweden
  4. 4.The Ratio InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations