Advertisement

Computational Statistics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 39–55 | Cite as

Regression Models for Correlated Biliary Data with Random Effects Assuming a Mixture of Normal Distributions

  • Jorge Alberto Achcar
  • Vanderly Janeiro
  • Josmar Mazucheli
Article
  • 501 Downloads

Summary

Binary responses are correlated when the sampling units are clustered or when repeated binary responses are taken on the same experiment unit. In this paper we present a Bayesian analysis of logistic regression models for correlated binary data with random effects. We assume that the random effects, namely αi, i = 1, …, n are draw from a mixture of normal distributions. This assumption gives a great flexibility of fit by correlated binary data. Considering Gibbs sampling with Metropolis-Hastings algorithms, we obtain Monte Carlo estimates for the posterior quantities of interest

Keywords

correlated binary data logistic regression model random effects mixture of normal distributions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the referees for some useful suggestions which improved the paper.

References

  1. Albert, L; Jais, J.P. (1998). Gibbs Sampler For The Logistic Model in the Analysis of Longitudinal Binary Data. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2905–2921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnhart, H.X.; Williamson, J.M. (1998). Goodness-of-fit Tests for GEE Modeling with Binary Data. Biometrics, 54, 720–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chib, S.; Greenberg, E. (1998). Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models. Biometrika, 85, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dey, D.K.; Chen, M.H (1996). Bayesian Analysis of Correlated Binary Data Models. Technical Report, Dep. of Statistics, University of Connecticut, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  5. Gelfand, A.E. (1995). Model Determination Using Sampling-Based Methods. In Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (eds W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson and D.J. Spiegelhalter. London: Chapaman & Hall, 145–161.Google Scholar
  6. Gelfand, A.E.; Smith, A.F.M. (1990). Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelman, A.; Rubin, B.D. (1992). Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science, 4, 457–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilks, W.R.; Best, N.G.; Tan, K.K.C. (1995). Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling Within Gibbs Sampling. Applied Statistics, 44, 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horton, N.J.; Bebchuk, J.D.; Jones, C.L.; Lipsitz, S.R.; Catalano, P.J.; Zahner, G.E.P.; Fitzmaurice, G.M. (1999). Gooddness-of-fit for GEE: an Example with Mental Helth Service Utilization. Statistics im Medicine, 18, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huggins, R.M. (1991). Some Practical Aspects of a Conditional Likelihood Approach to Capture Experiments. Biometrics, 47, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kass, R.E.; Wasserman, L. (1995). A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 928–934.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and Variables in Econometrics, Econometric Society monographs in quantitative economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Ochi, Y. e Prentice, R.L. (1984). Likelihood Inference in a Correlated Probit Regression Model. Biometrics, 71, 531–543.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prentice, R.L. (1988). Correlated Binary Regression with Covariate Specific to each Binary Observation. Biometrics, 44, 1033–1048.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, A.F.M.; Robert, G. O. (1993). Bayesian Computation via the Gibbs Sampler and Related MCMC Methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B, 55, 3–24.Google Scholar
  17. Tanner, M.; Wong, W. (1987). The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–550.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Alberto Achcar
    • 1
  • Vanderly Janeiro
    • 2
  • Josmar Mazucheli
    • 2
  1. 1.ICMCUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Department of StatisticState University of MaringaMaringaBrazil

Personalised recommendations