Dynamic activity analysis model-based win-win development forecasting under environment regulations in China
Porter hypothesis states that environmental regulation may lead to win-win opportunities, that is, improve the productivity and reduce the undesirable output simultaneously. Based on directional distance function, this paper proposes a novel dynamic activity analysis model to forecast the possibilities of win-win development in Chinese industry between 2011 and 2050. The consistent bootstrap estimation procedures are also developed for statistical inference of the point forecasts. The evidence reveals that the appropriate energy-saving and emission-abating regulation will significantly result in both the net growth of potential output and the increasing growth of total factor productivity for most industrial sectors in a statistical sense. This favors Porter hypothesis.
KeywordsDynamic activity analysis model Win win development Environmental regulations China industry
The work is sponsored by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through SFB 649 “Economic Risk”. The supports from National Natural Science Foundation (71173048), National Social Science Foundation (12AZD047), Ministry of Education (11JJD790007), Shanghai Leading Talent Project and Fudan Zhuo-Shi Talent Plan are also acknowledged.
- Chen S (2013) Energy, environment and economic transformation in China. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Chen S, Golley J (2014) ‘Green’ productivity growth in China’s industrial economy. Energy Econ 44:89–98Google Scholar
- Chen W, Gao P, He J (2004) Impacts of future carbon reductions on the Chinese GDP growth. J Tsinghua Univ (Sci Technol) 44(6):744–747Google Scholar
- Chenery HB, Robinson S, Syrquin M (1986) Industrialization and growth: a comparative study. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: methodology and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit 33(1):132–163Google Scholar
- Lovell CAK (1993) Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–67Google Scholar
- Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T (2002) The link between green and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. J Environ Manag 65(4):339–346Google Scholar