Abstract
The Cox’s regression model is one of the most popular tools used in survival analysis. Recently, Qin and Jing (Commun Stat Simul Comput 30:79–90, 2001) applied empirical likelihood to study it with the assumption that baseline hazard function is known. However, in the Cox’s regression model the baseline hazard function is unspecified. Thus, their method suffers from severe defect. In this paper, we apply a variant of plug-in empirical likelihood by estimating the cumulative baseline hazard function. Adjusted empirical likelihood (AEL) confidence regions for the vector of regression parameters are obtained. Furthermore, we conduct a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the proposed AEL method by comparing it with normal approximation (NA) based method. The simulation studies show that both methods produce comparable coverage probabilities. The proposed AEL method outperforms the NA method based on power analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen PK, Gill DR (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting process. Ann Stat 10: 1100–1120
Chen J, Peng L, Zhao Y (2009) Empirical likelihood based confidence intervals for copulas. J Multivar Anal 100: 137–151
Cox DR (1972) Regression model and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220
Cox DR (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62: 269–276
Glenn NL, Zhao Y (2007) Weighted empirical likelihood estimates and their robustness properties. Comput Stat Data Anal 51: 5130–5141
Hjort NL, McKeague IW, Van Keilegom I (2009) Extending the scope of empirical likelihood. Ann Stat 37: 1079–1111
Li G, Wang QH (2003) Empirical likelihood regression analysis for right censored data. Stat Sin 13: 51–68
McKeague IW, Zhao Y (2002) Simultaneous confidence bands for ratios of survival functions via empirical likelihood. Stat Probab Lett 60: 405–415
McKeague IW, Zhao Y (2006) Width-scaled confidence bands for survival functions. Stat Probab Lett 76: 327–339
Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75: 237–249
Owen AB (1990) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat 18: 90–120
Owen AB (2001) Empirical likelihood. Chapman and Hall, London
Qin G, Jing BY (2001) Empirical likelihood for Cox regression model under random censorship. Commun Stat Simul Comput 30: 79–90
Rao JNK, Scott AJ (1981) The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. J Am Stat Assoc 76: 221–230
Wang QH, Rao JNK (2001) Empirical likelihood for linear regression models under imputation for missing responses. Can J Stat 29: 597–608
Wang QH, Rao JNK (2002) Empirical likelihood-based inference in linear models with missing data. Scand J Stat 29: 563–576
Zhao Y (2005) Regression analysis for long-term survival rate via empirical likelihood. J Nonparametr Stat 17: 995–1007
Zhao Y (2010) Semiparametric inference for transformation models via empirical likelihood. J Multivar Anal 101: 1846–1858
Zhao Y, Chen F (2008) Empirical likelihood inference for censored median regression model via nonparametric kernel estimation. J Multivar Anal 99: 215–231
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Y., Jinnah, A. Inference for Cox’s regression models via adjusted empirical likelihood. Comput Stat 27, 1–12 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-010-0225-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-010-0225-1
Keywords
- Confidence region
- Adjusted empirical likelihood
- Normal approximation
- Coverage probability
- Power analysis