Computational Statistics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 199–218 | Cite as

Modelling non-stationary dynamic gene regulatory processes with the BGM model

  • Marco Grzegorczyk
  • Dirk Husmeier
  • Jörg Rahnenführer
Original Paper


Recently, a Bayesian network model for inferring non-stationary regulatory processes from gene expression time series has been proposed. The Bayesian Gaussian Mixture (BGM) Bayesian network model divides the data into disjunct compartments (data subsets) by a free allocation model, and infers network structures, which are kept fixed for all compartments. Fixing the network structure allows for some information sharing among compartments, and each compartment is modelled separately and independently with the Gaussian BGe scoring metric for Bayesian networks. The BGM model can equally be applied to both static (steady-state) and dynamic (time series) gene expression data. However, it is this flexibility that renders its application to time series data suboptimal. To improve the performance of the BGM model on time series data we propose a revised approach in which the free allocation of data points is replaced by a changepoint process so as to take the temporal structure into account. The practical inference follows the Bayesian paradigm and approximately samples the network, the number of compartments and the changepoint locations from the posterior distribution with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). Our empirical results show that the proposed modification leads to a more efficient inference tool for analysing gene expression time series.


Dynamic Bayesian networks Non-stationary gene regulatory processes Changepoint process Gene networks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beal M, Falciani F, Ghahramani Z, Rangel C, Wild D (2005) A Bayesian approach to reconstructing genetic regulatory networks with hidden factors. Bioinformatics 21(3): 349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darnell J, Kerr I, Stark G (1994) Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science 264: 1415–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman N, Koller D (2003) Being Bayesian about network structure. Mach Learn 50: 95–126zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geiger D, Heckerman D (1994) Learning Gaussian networks. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp 235–243Google Scholar
  5. Gelman A, Rubin D (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7: 457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green P (1995) Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82: 711–732MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grzegorczyk M, Husmeier D (2008) Improving the structure MCMC sampler for Bayesian networks by introducing a new edge reversal move. Mach Learn 71: 265–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grzegorczyk M, Husmeier D, Edwards K, Ghazal P, Millar A (2008) Modelling non-stationary gene regulatory processes with a non-homogeneous Bayesian network and the allocation sampler. Bioinformatics 24: 2071–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heckerman D (1999) A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. In: Jordan MI (eds) Learning in graphical models, adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 301–354Google Scholar
  10. Honda K, Takaoka A, Taniguchi T. (2006) Type I interferon gene induction by the Interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors. Immunity 25: 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husmeier D (2003) Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 19: 2271–2282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Madigan D, York J (1995) Bayesian graphical models for discrete data. Int Stat Rev 63: 215–232zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raza S, Robertson K, Lacaze P, Page D, Enright A, Ghazal P, Freeman T (2008) A logic based diagram of signalling pathways central to macrophage activation. BMC Systems Biology 2:Article 36Google Scholar
  14. Rogers S, Girolami M (2005) A Bayesian regression approach to the inference of regulatory networks from gene expression data. Bioinformatics 21(14): 3131–3137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sachs K, Perez O, Pe‘er DA, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP (2005) Protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 308: 523–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Grzegorczyk
    • 1
  • Dirk Husmeier
    • 2
  • Jörg Rahnenführer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations