Advertisement

Development and kinetic evaluation of a low-cost temperature-sensitive shape memory polymer for 4-dimensional printing

  • Michael Carlson
  • Ye LiEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

4D printing has been evolving from traditional 3D printing in the past years as an enabling technology imparting additive manufacturing with unprecedented functionality of creating time-dependent geometries. However, the current development status presents both cost and technical barriers, keeping 4D printing from being accessible to the general 3D printer users, in particular those who already have traditional 3D printing machines. This paper reported the development and kinetic evaluation of a low-cost temperature-sensitive shape memory polymer for 4D printing. The shape memory polymer is made of polylactic acid (PLA)-thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) composite in the form of filaments under different weight concentration ratios through extrusion processes. The filaments were tested in an FDM process to make 4D printed structures. The experiment study reveals the relationship between the material concentration ratio, recovery rate of sample workpieces, and the number of repeating recovery cycles. In addition, dynamic characteristics such as recovery velocity, acceleration, angular velocity, and angular acceleration were also investigated to characterize the behavior of the shape memory polymer. At the end of the paper, examples are provided to demonstrate the capability of the shape memory polymer in FDM-based 4D printing applications.

Keywords

4D printing Shape memory polymers (SMP) Polylactic acid (PLA) Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) Fused deposition modeling (FDM) 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Zarek M, Layani M, Cooperstein I, Sachyani E, Cohn D, Magdassi S (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. J Adv Mater 28:4449–4454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi J, Kwon O-C, Jo W, Lee HJ, Moon M-W (2015) 4D printing technology: a review. 3D Print Addit Manufact 2(4):159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mantovani D, El Feniant F, Laroche G, Fiset M (2002) Shape memory materials for biomedical applications. Adv Eng Mater 4(3):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choong YYC, Maleksaeedi S, Eng H, Wei J, Su P-C (2017) 4D printing of high performance shape memory polymer using stereolithography. J Mat Design 126:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y, Li Y (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:2079–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakarich, Shannon E.; Gorkin, Robert; Panhuis, Marc In Het; Spinks, Geoffrey M, “4D printing with mechanically robust, thermally actuating hydrogels”, Macromol Rapid Commun, v 36, n 12, p 1211–1217, 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zolfagharian, Ali; Kaynak, Akif; Khoo, Sui Yang; Kouzani, Abbas, “Pattern-driven 4D printing”, Sensors Actuators A Phys, v 274, p 231–243, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naficy, Sina; Gately, Reece; Gorkin, Robert; Xin, Hai; Spinks, Geoffrey M, “4D printing of reversible shape morphing hydrogel structures”, Macromol Mater Eng, v 302, n 1, 1600212 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo, Jinhua; Zhang, Rongrong; Zhang, Lina; Cao, Xiaodong, “4D printing of robust hydrogels consisted of agarose nanofibers and polyacrylamide”, ACS Macro Lett, v 7, n 4, p 442–446, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bakarich, Shannon E.; Gorkin, Robert; Naficy, Sina; Gately, Reece; Panhuis, Marc In Het; Spinks, Geoffrey M., “3D/4D printing hydrogel composites: a pathway to functional devices”, MRS Adv, v 1, n 8, p 521–526, 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCracken JM, Rauzan BM, Kjellman JCE, Su H, Rogers SA, Nuzzo RG (2019) Ionic hydrogels with biomimetic 4D-printed mechanical gradients: models for soft-bodied aquatic organisms. Advanced Functional MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roach, Devin J; Kuang, Xiao; Yuan, Chao; Chen, Kaijuan; Qi, H Jerry, “Novel ink for ambient condition printing of liquid crystal elastomers for 4D printing”, Smart Mater Struct, v 27, n 12, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuang, Xiao; Chen, Kaijuan; Dunn, Conner K.; Wu, Jiangtao; Li, Vincent C. F.; Qi, H. Jerry, “3D printing of highly stretchable, shape-memory, and self-healing elastomer toward novel 4D printing”, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, v 10, n 8, p 7381–7388, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saed, Mohand O.; Ambulo, Cedric P.; Kim, Hyun; De, Rohit; Raval, Vyom; Searles, Kyle; Siddiqui, Danyal A.; Cue, John Michael O.; Stefan, Mihaela C.; Shankar, M. Ravi; Ware, Taylor H., “Molecularly-engineered, 4D-printed liquid crystal elastomer actuators”, Adv Funct Mater, v 29, n 3, 1806412, 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mu, Quanyi, Dunn, Conner K.; Wang, Lei, Dunn, Martin L; Qi, H Jerry, Wang, Tiejun (2017), “Thermal cure effects on electromechanical properties of conductive wires by direct ink write for 4D printing and soft machines”, Smart Mater Struct, v 26, n 4:045008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu, Pengfei; Yang, Weiyi; Wang, Rong; Gao, Shuang; Li, Bo; Li, Qi, “4D printing of complex structures with a fast response time to magnetic stimulus”, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, v 10, n 42, p 36435–36442, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Momeni, Farhang; M.Mehdi Hassani.N, Seyed; Liu, Xun; Ni, Jun, “A review of 4D printing”, Mater Des, v 122, p 42–79, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Z, Demir KG, Gu GX (2019) Developments in 4D-printing: a review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications. International Journal of Smart and Nano MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, Amelia Yilin; An, Jia; Chua, Chee Kai, “Two-way 4D printing: a review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials”, Engineering, v 3, n 5, p 663–674, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchell A, Lafont U, Hołyńska M, Semprimoschnig C (December 2018) Additive manufacturing—a review of 4D printing and future applications. Additive Manufact 24:606–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ge Q, Sakhaei AH, Lee H, Dunn CK, Fang NX, Dunn ML (2016) Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 6:31110.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai J (2016) 4D printing dielectric elastomer actuator based soft robots. In: Theses and Dissertations. 1680. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1680 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosset S, Araromi OA, Schlatter S, Shea HR (2016) Fabrication process of silicone-based dielectric elastomer actuators. J Vis Exp 108:e53423.  https://doi.org/10.33791/53423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naficy S, Spinks GM, Wallace GG (2014) Thin, tough, pH-sensitive hydrogel films with rapid load recovery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(6):4109–4114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ge Q, Dunn CK, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2014) Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 23:1–15Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meng Y, Jiang J, Anthamatten M (2016) Body temperature triggered shape-memory polymers with high elastic energy storage capacity. J Polym Sci 54:1397–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang W, Chen L, Zhang Y (2009) Surprising shape-memory effect of polylactide resulted from toughening by polyamide elastomer. Polymer 50(5):1311–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang, Quan; Yan, Dong; Zhang, Kai; Hu, Genkai. “Pattern transformation of heat-shrinkable polymer by three-dimensional (3D) printing technique”. Sci Rep. Vol. 5, 2015. 8936, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep/08936
  29. 29.
    Jing X, Mi H-Y, Peng X-F, Turng L-S (2015) The morphology, properties, and shape memory behavior of polylactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Polym Eng Sci 55(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sodergard A, Stolt M (2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Prog Polym Sci 27(6):1123–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buj-Corral I, Domínguez-Fernández A, Durán-Llucià R (2019) Influence of print orientation on surface roughness in fused deposition modeling (FDM) processes. Materials 12(23):3834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pérez M, Medina-Sánchez G, García-Collado A, Gupta M, Carou D (2018) Surface quality enhancement of fused deposition modeling (FDM) printed samples based on the selection of critical printing parameters. Materials 11:1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raju M, Gupta MK, Bhanot N, Sharma VS (2019) A hybrid PSO–BFO evolutionary algorithm for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters. J Intell Manuf 30(7):2743–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Williams ML, Landel RF, Ferry JD (1955) The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. J Am Chem Soc 77(14):3701–3707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    NinjaTek Technical Specifications. NinjaFlex 3D printing filament—flexible polyurethane material for FDM printers material data sheets. URL: https://ninjatek.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/NinjaFlex-TDS.pdf
  36. 36.
    Blaber, Justin; Antoniou, Antonia. Ncorr DIC Instruction Manual. URL: http://ncorr.com/download/ncorrmanual_v1_1.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and TechnologyBradley UniversityPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations