Advertisement

Computer-aided design (CAD) compensation through modeling of shrinkage in additively manufactured parts

  • Insaf BahniniEmail author
  • Uzair Khaleeq uz Zaman
  • Mickaël Rivette
  • Nicolas Bonnet
  • Ali Siadat
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Despite the advantages that additive manufacturing (AM) processes present and the progressive number of activity sectors that they emerge in, their successful adoption is currently hampered by defects in surface finish as well as dimensional and geometrical precision. This results in reduction of their suitability for net shape manufacturing, thereby, requiring the evaluation of their performances. Considering this notion, this paper deals with in-plane deviation modeling of material shrinkage occurring in fused deposition modeling (FDM) process. To achieve this aim, two models were developed, each for circular and squared shapes. The objective was to first understand the deviation behavior, then compare it with actual data extracted from a test part to find out the rates with which the shrinkage would be compensated, and finally based on the obtained results, the CAD file would be modified. The experimental findings showed the effectiveness of the adopted methodology and the ability of developed models to compensate for the deviation.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Deviation compensation Deviation modeling Dimensional accuracy Fused deposition modeling process 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Bahnini I, Rivette M, Rechia A, Siadat A, Elmesbahi A (2018) Additive manufacturing technology: the status, applications, and prospects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang Q, Nouri H, Xu K, Chen Y, Sosina S, Dasgupta T (2014) Predictive modeling of geometric deviations of 3d printed products – a unified modeling approach for cylindrical and polygon shapes, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CoASE.2014.6899299
  3. 3.
    Huang Q, Zhang J, Sabbaghi A, Dasgupta T (2015) Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three dimensional printing processes. IIE Trans 47(5):431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2014.955599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luan H, Grasso M, Colosimo BM, Huang Q, Angeles L (2019) Prescriptive data-analytical modeling of laser powder bed fusion processes for accuracy improvement. J Manuf Sci Eng 141(1):011008 (13 pages).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61(5):315–360.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tong K, Lehtihet EA, Joshi S (2003) Parametric error modeling and software error compensation for rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyp J 9(5):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong K, Joshi S, Lehtihet EA (2008) Error compensation for fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine by correcting slice files. Rapid Prototyp J 14(1):4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540810841517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu L, Angeles L, Sabbaghi A (2013) Shape deviation modeling for dimensional quality control in additive manufacturing. ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 66329: V02AT02A018 (6 pages).  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2013-66329
  9. 9.
    Zhu Z, Keimasi S, Anwer N, Mathieu L, Qiao L (2016) Review of shape deviation modeling for additive manufacturing. In International Joint Conference on Mechanics, Design Engineering & Advanced Manufacturing (JCM 2016) (pp. 205–241). Catane, Italy: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_25 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu Z, Anwer N, Mathieu L (2017) Deviation modeling and shape transformation in design for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 60:211–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu Z, Anwer N, Mathieu L (2018) Shape transformation perspective for geometric deviation modeling in additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 75:75–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research team in Engineering, Innovation, and Management of Industrial Systems (EIMIS), Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier (FSTT)University Abdelmalek EssaadiTétouanMorocco
  2. 2.Department of Mechatronics EngineeringNational University of Sciences and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Conception Fabrication Commande, Arts et Métiers ParisTech - Campus de MetzMetzFrance

Personalised recommendations