Advertisement

Optimization of Kanban systems using robust parameter design: a case of study

  • W. L. M. BragaEmail author
  • F. L. Naves
  • J. H. F. Gomes
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The current competitive market demands that manufacturing companies have a survival strategy which should totally focus on providing high-quality products, being consistent in the level of service provided, having lower inventory levels and higher flexibility in operations. In this context, Kanban can be classified as a tool that assists in the proper sizing of inventory levels and production control of the system. However, numerous studies have been developed with the aim of reliably reducing stock levels in Kanban supermarkets, yielding different optimization techniques, but for fixed demands. This work proposes the minimization solution of the supermarket from randomly different demands, using environments with simulated experiments from the ARENA® software, from a response surface methodology (RSM) along with a weighted minimization of the mean standard error and compare with the results provided by the use of optimizer Arena OptQuest®, thus, it is possible to evaluate the robustness question.

Keywords

Kanban Design of experiments Robust project design Simulation experiments OptQuest® 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed I, Sultana I (2014) A state of art review on optimization techniques in just in time. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 2, 15:–26Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araz OU, Eski O, Araz C (2008) Determining the parameters of dual-card Kanban system: an integrated multicriteria and artificial neural network methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:965–977.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1138-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ardakani MK, Noorossana R (2008) A new optimization criterion for robust parameter design – the case of target is best. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bezzerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brenneman, W.; Myers, W. Robust parameter design with categorical noise variables. J Qual Technol. Vol. 35, n 4, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gijo, EV Scaria, J (2012) Product design by application of Taguchi's robust engineering using computer simulation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 25(9): 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hou TH, Hu WC (2011) An integrated MOGA approach to determine the Pareto-optimal KANBAN number and size for a JIT system. Expert Syst Appl 38:5912–5918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hurrion RD (1997) An example of simulation optimization using a neural network metamodel: finding the optimum number of Kanbans in a manufacturing system. J Oper Res Soc 48:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jerbi A, Ammar A, Rid M, Salah B. Performance optimization of a flexible manufacturing system using simulation: the Taguchi method versus OptQuest®Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Köksoy O, Yalcinoz T (2006) Mean square error criteria to multiresponse process optimization by a new genetic algorithm. Appl Math Comput 175:1657–1674zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krajewski LJ, Ritzman L, Malhotra M (2009) Operations management, 9th edn. Edição, Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lavoie P, Gharbi A, Keneé JP (2010) A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines. Int J Prod Econ 124:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Price W, Gravel M, Nsakanda AL (1994) A review of optimization models of Kanban-based production systems. Eur J Oper Res 75:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rossetti MD (2016) Simulation modeling and Arena®, 2nd edn. Edição. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. L. M. Braga
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • F. L. Naves
    • 3
  • J. H. F. Gomes
    • 2
  1. 1.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC)Poços de CaldasBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial Engineering and ManagementFederal University of ItajubáItajubáBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering and StatisticsFederal University of São João del-ReiOuro BrancoBrazil

Personalised recommendations