Advertisement

Effect of liquid nitrogen cooling on surface integrity in cryogenic milling of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy

  • Wei ZhaoEmail author
  • Fei Ren
  • Asif Iqbal
  • Le Gong
  • Ning He
  • Qing Xu
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Owing to poor thermal conductivity, heat dissipation, and high chemical reactivity toward most of the tool materials, temperature elevation in the machining of titanium alloy leads to poor surface quality. Based on analyzing the variation laws of the milling forces under cryogenic cooling, the present investigation concerns the surface integrity (surface roughness, micro-hardness, microstructures, and residual stresses) in cryogenic milling of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy under the application of liquid nitrogen (LN2) as a cooling mode. Findings have indicated a dramatic increase in milling forces, and decreasing surface roughness was observed under variation of jet temperature (20~−196 °C). Besides an increase in cutting speed from 60 to 120 m/min, a linear increase in cutting forces, surface roughness, micro-hardness, and residual compressive stress was observed. The minimum micro-hardness decreased at cutting speed of 90 m/min and up to 30 μm in depth. A holistic comparison between obtained results under cryogenic milling and previously studied results under dry milling at same cutting conditions depicted higher micro-hardness and higher compressive residual stress under cryogenic LN2 on the machined surface. However, the residual stress under LN2 cooling conditions tends to decrease relatively slower compared to dry milling. Also, there are no significant differences in grain refinement and twisting under dry and cryogenic LN2 machining. The research work proves the effectiveness of cryogenic milling in improving the surface integrity of the Ti-6Al-4 V alloy.

Keywords

Cryogenic milling Titanium alloy Surface integrity Liquid nitrogen cooling 

Notes

Funding information

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of this research by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract no. 51475234 and General Assembly Project under contract no. 9140A18030115HT90052.

References

  1. 1.
    Hong SY (2001) Economical and ecological cryogenic machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(2):331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Logan M (2012) Cryogenic cooling that increases tool life. MAG Industrial Automation Systems, ErlangerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ravi S, Kumar MP (2011) Experimental investigations on cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen in the end milling of hardened steel. Cryogenics 51:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul S, Dhar NR, Chattopadhyay AB (2001) Beneficial effects of cryogenic cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning AISI 1060 steel. J Mater Process Technol 116(1):44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ghamdi KA, Iqbal A, Hussain G (2015) Machinability comparison of AISI 4340 and Ti-6Al-4 V under cryogenic and hybrid cooling environments: a knowledge engineering approach. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 229(12):2144–2164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shokrania A, Dhokia V. Newman ST, et al (2012) An initial study of the effect of using liquid nitrogen coolant on the surface roughness of Inconel 718 nickel-based alloy in CNC milling. Procedia CIRP 3: 121-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tazehkandi AH, Shabgard M, Pilehvarian F (2015) Application of liquid nitrogen and spray mode of biodegradable vegetable cutting fluid with compressed air in order to reduce cutting fluid consumption in turning Inconel 740. J Clean Prod 108:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhananchezian M, Kumar MP (2011) Cryogenic turning of the Ti-6Al-4 V alloy with modified cutting tool inserts. Cryogenics 51:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pu Z, Outeiro JC, Batista AC et al (2012) Enhanced surface integrity of AZ31B Mg alloy by cryogenic machining towards improved functional performance of machined components. Int J Mach Tool Manu 56:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pusavec F, Hamdi H, Kopac J et al (2011) Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel-based alloy–Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):773–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Umbrello D, Micari F, Jawahir IS (2012) The effects of cryogenic cooling on surface integrity in hard machining: a comparison with dry machining. CIRP Annals-Manu Tech 61(1):103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biček M, Dumont F, Courbon C et al (2012) Cryogenic machining as an alternative turning process of normalized and hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol 212(12):2609–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mou H, Huang X, Yuan Y et al (2014) Investigation of surface integrity of aluminum lithium alloy in high speed machining. Scientia Sinica Technologica 44(1):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang X, Mu H, Huang X et al (2015) Cryogenic milling of aluminum-lithium alloys: thermo- mechanical modelling towards fine-tuning of part surface residual stress. Procedia CIRP 31:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pu Z, Outeiro JC, Batista AC et al (2011) Surface integrity in dry and cryogenic machining of AZ31B Mg alloy with varying cutting-edge radius tools. Procedia Engineering 19:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaynak Y, Lu T, Jawahir IS (2014) Cryogenic machining-induced surface integrity: a review and comparison with dry, MQL, and flood-cooled machining. Mach Sci Technol 18(2):149–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bordin A, Sartori S, Bruschi S et al (2017) Experimental investigation on the feasibility of dry and cryogenic machining as sustainable strategies when turning Ti-6Al-4 V produced by additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 142(4):4142–4151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST (2016) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4 V titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 21:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schoop J, Sales WF, Jawahir IS (2017) High speed cryogenic finish machining of Ti-6Al-4 V with polycrystalline diamond tools. J Mater Process Technol 250:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bermingham MJ, Palanisamy S, Kent D et al (2012) A comparison of cryogenic and high pressure emulsion cooling technologies on tool life and chip morphology in Ti-6Al-4 V cutting. J Mater Process Technol 212(4):752–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bermingham MJ, Kirsch J, Sun S et al (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4 V. Int J Mach Tool Manu 51(6):500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iqbal A, Biermann D, Abbas H et al (2018) Machining β-titanium alloy under carbon dioxide snow and micro-lubrication: a study on tool deflection, energy consumption, and tool damage. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:4195–4208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sartori S, Moro L, Ghiotti A et al (2017) On the tool wear mechanisms in dry and cryogenic turning additive manufactured titanium alloys. Tribol Int 105:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Isakson S, Sadik MI, Malakizadi A et al (2018) Effect of cryogenic cooling and tool wear on surface integrity of turned Ti-6Al-4 V. Procedia CIRP 71:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jamil M, Khan AM, Hegab H et al (2019) Effects of hybrid Al2O3-CNT nanofluids and cryogenic cooling on machining of Ti–6Al–4 V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9-12):3895–3909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao W, Gong L, Ren F et al (2018) Experimental study on chip deformation of Ti-6Al-4 V titanium alloy in cryogenic cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9-12):4021–4027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gong L, Zhao W, Ren F et al (2019) Experimental study on surface integrity in cryogenic milling of 35CrMnSiA high-strength steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(1-4):605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Palanisamy S et al (2015) Effect of cryogenic compressed air on the evolution of cutting force and tool wear during machining of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 221:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khan AM, Jamil M, Ul Haq A et al (2019) Sustainable machining. Modeling and optimization of temperature and surface roughness in the milling of AISI D2 steel. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology 71(2):267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fei Ren
    • 2
  • Asif Iqbal
    • 3
  • Le Gong
    • 1
  • Ning He
    • 1
  • Qing Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Aerospace Equipment Manufacturer Co. Ltd.ShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Faculty of Integrated TechnologiesUniversiti Brunei DarussalamGadongBrunei Darussalam

Personalised recommendations