This paper consists in a review of environmental issues of additive manufacturing technologies, mainly in those related to fused deposition modelling. The versatility, reduction of equipment costs due to patents expiring and the great flexibility offered by 3D printers have driven the amazing increase of these technologies in the last years. On the other hand, the democratization of additive manufacturing also poses some issues regarding environment; it is important to also have into account the potential effects of these technologies in the environment, coming from energy consumption, materials, and wastes produced. A review of different research works dealing with environmental impact of additive manufacturing, such as products’ life cycle assessment, energy and materials consumption, and particles and gases releases (mainly due to health issues), has been performed. The assessment performed has helped highlighting the importance of environmental issues in additive manufacturing, according to the number of published papers. The main findings are the importance of establishing a method for applying eco-design principles taking into account the specific features of additive manufacturing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Attaran M (2017) The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz 60(5):677–688
Griffiths CA, Howarth J, De Almeida-Rowbotham G, Rees A, Kerton R (2016) A design of experiments approach for the optimisation of energy and waste during the production of parts manufactured by 3D printing. J Clean Prod 139:74–85
R. Song, L. Clemon, and C. Telenko, Uncertainty and variability of energy and material use by fused deposition modeling printers in makerspaces, J Indl Ecol Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111), 22-May-2018.
Rossi E, Di Nicolantonio M, Barcarolo P, and Lagatta J, Sustainable 3D printing: design opportunities and research perspectives, 2020, pp. 3–15.
Paris H, Mokhtarian H, Coatanéa E, Museau M, Ituarte IF (2016) Comparative environmental impacts of additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 65(1):29–32
Tang Y, Mak K, Zhao YF (2016) A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 137:1560–1572
Karlsson R, Luttropp C (2006) EcoDesign: what’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1291–1298
M. Godoy, Las cuatro claves del éxito del Ecodiseño, www.slowfashionnext.com , 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.slowfashionnext.com/blog/2016/01/07/las-cuatro-claves-del-exito-del-ecodiseno/. [Accessed: 18-May-2019].
Oh S (2017) From an Ecodesign guide to a sustainable design guide: complementing social aspects of sustainable product design guidelines. Arch Des Res 30(2):47–64
W. McDonough and Partners, The Hannover principles design for sustainability, 1992.
Rivera Pedroza JC and Hernandis Ortuño B (2012) Aplicación de Criterios de Sostenibilidad al Modelo de Diseño Concurrente Para El Diseño De Un ‘Jardín Vertical Al Interior De Las Viviendas’, II Conferência Int. Des. Eng. e Gestão para a Inovação, no. October, pp. 21–23.
Chun YY et al (2018) Identifying key components of products based on consumer- and producer-oriented ecodesign indices considering environmental impacts, costs, and utility value. J Clean Prod 198:1031–1043
Santolaria M, Oliver-Sol J, Gasol CM, Morales-Pinzón T, Rieradevall J (2011) Eco-design in innovation driven companies: perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. The Spanish example. J Clean Prod 19(12):1315–1323
Mani M, Lyons KW, Gupta SK (2014) Sustainability characterization for additive manufacturing. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 119:419–428
Tuck C, Bourell DL, Hague R, Baumers M, Sreenivasan R (2011) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: measuring the energy consumption of the laser sintering process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 225(12):2228–2239
Faludi J, Bayley C, Bhogal S, Iribarne M (2015) Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyp J 21(1):14–33
Gebler M, Schoot Uiterkamp AJM, Visser C (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74(C):158–167
Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Dembinski L, Hascoet JY, and Mognol P (2014) Predictive model for environmental assessment in additive manufacturing process, in Procedia CIRP, 15:26–31.
Kellens K, Baumers M, Gutowski TG, Flanagan W, Lifset R, Duflou JR (2017) Environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing: mapping application domains and their environmental implications. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):S49–S68
Sreenivasan R, Goel A, Bourell DL (2010) Sustainability issues in laser-based additive manufacturing. Phys Procedia 5:81–90
Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587
Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Hascoet JY, Mognol P (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):1927–1939
Liu Z, Jiang Q, Zhang Y, Li T, and Zhang H.-C (2016) Sustainability of 3D printing: a critical review and recommendations, in Volume 2: Materials; Biomanufacturing; Properties, Applications and Systems; Sustainable Manufacturing, p. V002T05A004.
Baumers M, Duflou JR, Flanagan W, Gutowski TG, Kellens K, Lifset R (2017) Charting the environmental dimensions of additive manufacturing and 3D printing. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):S9–S14
Bours J, Adzima B, Gladwin S, Cabral J, Mau S (2017) Addressing hazardous implications of additive manufacturing: complementing life cycle assessment with a framework for evaluating direct human health and environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):S25–S36
Despeisse M et al (2017) Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: a research agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Change 115:75–84
Despeisse M and Ford S (2015) The role of additive manufacturing in improving resource efficiency and sustainability, in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 460:129–136.
Peng T, Kellens K, Tang R, Chen C, Chen G (2018) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: an overview on its energy demand and environmental impact. Additive Manufacturing 21:694–704
Cunico MWM, Kai DA, Cavalheiro PM, de Carvalho J (2019) Development and characterisation of 3D printing finishing process applying recycled plastic waste. Virtual Phys Prototyp 14(1):37–52
Fullenwider B, Kiani P, Schoenung JM, Ma K (2019) Two-stage ball milling of recycled machining chips to create an alternative feedstock powder for metal additive manufacturing. Powder Technol 342:562–571
Singh R, Singh H, Farina I, Colangelo F, Fraternali F (2019) On the additive manufacturing of an energy storage device from recycled material. Compos Part B Eng 156:259–265
Van Wijk AJM, Van Wijk I (2015) 3D printing with biomaterials: towards a sustainable and circular economy. IOS Press, Incorporated
Steinle P (2016) Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg 13(2):121–132
Babagowda RS, Kadadevara Math, Goutham R, and Srinivas Prasad KR (2018) Study of effects on mechanical properties of PLA filament which is blended with recycled PLA materials, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 310:1.
Van Den Bossche W, Peeters JR, Devoldere T, Duflou JR, Dewulf W (2014) Proof of concept of an elastomer based fastener enabling rapid disassembly. Procedia CIRP 15:234–238
Chen P et al (2018) Investigation into the processability, recyclability and crystalline structure of selective laser sintered polyamide 6 in comparison with polyamide 12. Polym Test 69:366–374
Wang L, Kiziltas A, Mielewski DF, Lee EC, Gardner DJ (2018) Closed-loop recycling of polyamide12 powder from selective laser sintering into sustainable composites. J Clean Prod 195:765–772
Domingues J, Marques T, Mateus A, Carreira P, Malça C (2017) An additive manufacturing solution to produce big green parts from tires and recycled plastics. Procedia Manuf 12:242–248
McAlister C, Wood J (2014) The potential of 3D printing to reduce the environmental impacts of production, 2014 ECEEE Ind. Summer Study Energy Effic Retool a Compet Sustain Ind 1:213–221
Jiang J, Xu X, Stringer J (2019) Optimization of process planning for reducing material waste in extrusion based additive manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 59:317–325
Valášek P, Müller M, Proshlyakov A (2012) Effect of sedimentation on the final hardness of polymeric particle composites. Res Agric Eng 58(3):92–98
Mohammed MI et al (2017) A low carbon footprint approach to the reconstitution of plastics into 3D-printer filament for enhanced waste reduction. KnE Eng 2(2):234
Czyżewski P et al (2018) Secondary use of ABS co-polymer recyclates for the manufacture of structural elements using the FFF technology. Rapid Prototyp J 24(9):1447–1454
Hart KR, Frketic JB, Brown JR (2018) Recycling meal-ready-to-eat (MRE) pouches into polymer filament for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 21:536–543
Zander NE, Gillan M, Lambeth RH (2018) Recycled polyethylene terephthalate as a new FFF feedstock material. Addit Manuf 21:174–182
Le VT, Paris H, Mandil G (2018) The development of a strategy for direct part reuse using additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. Addit Manuf 22:687–699
Kucherov FA, Gordeev EG, Kashin AS, Ananikov VP (2017) Three-dimensional printing with biomass-derived PEF for carbon-neutral manufacturing. Angew Chem Int Ed 56(50):15931–15935
Xu W, Pranovich A, Uppstu P, Wang X, Kronlund D, Hemming J, Öblom H, Moritz N, Preis M, Sandler N, Willför S, Xu C (2018) Novel biorenewable composite of wood polysaccharide and polylactic acid for three dimensional printing. Carbohydr Polym 187:51–58
Voet VSD, Schnelting GHM, Xu J, Loos K, Folkersma R, and Jager J (2018) Stereolithographic 3D printing with renewable acrylates, J Vis Exp, no. 139
Voet VSD, Strating T, Schnelting GHM, Dijkstra P, Tietema M, Xu J, Woortman AJJ, Loos K, Jager J, Folkersma R (2018) Biobased acrylate photocurable resin formulation for stereolithography 3D printing. ACS Omega 3(2):1403–1408
Behm JE, Waite BR, Hsieh ST, Helmus MR (2018) Benefits and limitations of three-dimensional printing technology for ecological research. BMC Ecol 18(1):32
Horta JF, Simões FJP, Mateus A (2018) Large scale additive manufacturing of eco-composites. Int J Mater Form 11(3):375–380
Brites F et al (2017) Cork plastic composite optimization for 3D printing applications. Procedia Manuf 12:156–165
Girdis J, Gaudion L, Proust G, Löschke S, Dong A (2017) Rethinking timber: investigation into the use of waste macadamia nut shells for additive manufacturing. JOM 69(3):575–579
Sauerwein M, Doubrovski EL (2018) Local and recyclable materials for additive manufacturing: 3D printing with mussel shells. Mater Today Commun 15:214–217
Gkartzou E, Koumoulos EP, Charitidis CA (2017) Production and 3D printing processing of bio-based thermoplastic filament. Manuf Rev 4:1
Dong Y, Milentis J, Pramanik A (2018) Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites. Adv Manuf 6(1):71–82
Kariz M, Sernek M, Obućina M, Kuzman MK (2018) Effect of wood content in FDM filament on properties of 3D printed parts. Mater Today Commun 14:135–140
Zeidler H, Klemm D, Böttger-Hiller F, Fritsch S, Le Guen MJ, Singamneni S (2018) 3D printing of biodegradable parts using renewable biobased materials. Procedia Manuf 21:117–124
Montalvo Navarrete JI, Hidalgo-Salazar MA, Escobar Nunez E, Rojas Arciniegas AJ (2018) Thermal and mechanical behavior of biocomposites using additive manufacturing. Int J Interact Des Manuf 12(2):449–458
Kariz M, Sernek M, Kuzman MK (2016) Use of wood powder and adhesive as a mixture for 3D printing. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 74(1):123–126
Pitt K, Lopez-Botello O, Lafferty AD, Todd I, Mumtaz K (2017) Investigation into the material properties of wooden composite structures with in-situ fibre reinforcement using additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 138:32–39
Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R, Martin N (2016) 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106–114
Watson JK, Taminger KMB (2018) A decision-support model for selecting additive manufacturing versus subtractive manufacturing based on energy consumption. J Clean Prod 176:1316–1322
Rauch E, Dallasega P, Matt DT (2016) Sustainable production in emerging markets through distributed manufacturing systems (DMS). J Clean Prod 135:127–138
Cerdas F, Juraschek M, Thiede S, Herrmann C (2017) Life cycle assessment of 3D printed products in a distributed manufacturing system. J Ind Ecol 21:S80–S93
Bogers M, Hadar R, Bilberg A (2016) Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Change 102:225–239
Khajavi SH, Partanen J, Holmström J (2014) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput Ind 65(1):50–63
Dematteo R et al (2013) Chemical exposures of women workers in the plastics industry with particular reference to breast cancer and reproductive hazards. NEW Solut A J Environ Occup Heal Policy 22(4):427–448
Pilou M, Mavrofrydi O, Housiadas C, Eleftheriadis K, Papazafiri P (2015) Computational modeling as part of alternative testing strategies in the respiratory and cardiovascular systems: inhaled nanoparticle dose modeling based on representative aerosol measurements and corresponding toxicological analysis. Nanotoxicology 9(sup1):106–115
Azimi P, Fazli T, Stephens B (2017) Predicting concentrations of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds resulting from desktop 3D printer operation and the impact of potential control strategies. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):S107–S119
Mendes L et al (2017) Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):S94–S106
Afshar-Mohajer N, Wu C-Y, Ladun T, Rajon DA, Huang Y (2015) Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build Environ 93:293–301
This work was supported by Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales at Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) [grant number 2019-ICF06].
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Suárez, L., Domínguez, M. Sustainability and environmental impact of fused deposition modelling (FDM) technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 1267–1279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04676-0
- Environmental impact
- Energy consumption
- Volatile organic compounds
- 3D printing