Advertisement

Electrochemical discharge machining: fumes generations, properties and biological effects

  • Manpreet SinghEmail author
  • Sarbjit Singh
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) is a non-conventional machining process which is highly susceptible for machining of various materials irrespective of their properties. This process is successfully attempted for machining of micro-holes and micro-channels on ceramics, composites and super-alloys for micro electromechanical system, lab-on-chip devices and aerospace applications. However, since the development of ECDM process, the environmental aspects and its effect on human health are least reported. Therefore, the analysis and characterization of fumes particles, gases and compounds generated in breathing zone of ECDM process is the key route for its conversion to sustainable and green manufacturing process. This paper describes the fumes mass concentration, morphology of fume particles, average size and chemical composition in ECDM process with alkaline electrolytes such as KOH. The morphological analysis of fumes particles in ECDM process exhibits different shapes such as spherical, irregular, rectangular, agglomerations and flower shell structure. The energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) is carried out to predict chemical composition of fumes particles generated in ECDM process. The EDS analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of fumes particles reveal the presence of different toxic elements and compounds such as Cr, Mg, Ti and Fe, which have carcinogen effects on environment as well as on human health.

Keywords

Electrochemical discharge machining Electrolyte Fumes mass concentration Morphology Chemical composition Biological effects 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India, under grant EMR/2016/005352.

References

  1. 1.
    Valaki JB, Rathod PP (2016) Assessment of operational feasibility of waste vegetable oil based bio-dielectric fluid for sustainable electric discharge machining (EDM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5–8):1509–1518Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hegab HA, Darras B, Kishawy HA (2018) Towards sustainability assessment of machining processes. J Clean Prod 170:694–703Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang Z, Zhang H, Sutherland JW (2012) Development of an environmental performance assessment method for manufacturing process plans. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(5–8):783–790Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chak SK, Rao PV (2008) The drilling of Al 2 O 3 using a pulsed DC supply with a rotary abrasive electrode by the electrochemical discharge process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(7–8):633–641Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elhami S, Razfar MR (2017) Study of the current signal and material removal during ultrasonic-assisted electrochemical discharge machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):1591–1599Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antil P, Singh S, Manna A (2018) Electrochemical discharge drilling of SiC reinforced polymer matrix composite using Taguchi’s grey relational analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 43(3):1257–1266Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurafuji H, Suda K (1968) Electrical discharge drilling of glass-I. Ann CIRP 16:415Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathew J, Sivapirakasam SP, Surianarayanan M (2010) Evaluation of occupational exposure to aerosol emitted from die sinking electrical discharge machining process. Int J Environ Health 4(1):1–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sivapirakasam SP, Mathew J, Surianarayanan M (2011) Constituent analysis of aerosol generated from die sinking electrical discharge machining process. Process Saf Environ Prot 89(2):141–150Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thiyagarajan S, Sivapirakasam SP, Mathew J, Surianarayanan M, Sundareswaran K (2014) Influence of workpiece materials on aerosol emission from die sinking electrical discharge machining process. Process Saf Environ Prot 92(6):739–749Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen R, Shi X, Bai R, Rang W, Huo L, Zhao L, Long D, Pui DY, Chen C (2015) Airborne nanoparticle pollution in a wire electrical discharge machining workshop and potential health risks. Aerosol Air Qual Res 15(1):284–294Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tönshoff HK, Egger R, Klocke F (1996) Environmental and safety aspects of electrophysical and electrochemical processes. CIRP Ann 45(2):553–568Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oberdorster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol 2(1):1–35Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan J, Feng C, Li L (2014) Sustainability assessment of machining process based on extension theory and entropy weight approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5–8):1419–1431Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kishawy H, Hegab H, Saad E (2018) Design for sustainable manufacturing: approach, implementation, and assessment. Sustainability. 10(10):1–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adler DP, Hii WS, Michalek DJ, Sutherland JW (2006) Examining the role of cutting fluids in machining and efforts to address associated environmental/health concerns. Mach Sci Technol 10(1):23–58Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jose M, Sivapirakasam SP, Surianarayanan M (2010) Analysis of aerosol emission and hazard evaluation of electrical discharge machining (EDM) process. Ind Health 48(4):478–486Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarkar BR, Doloi B, Bhattacharyya B (2006) Parametric analysis on electrochemical discharge machining of silicon nitride ceramics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(9–10):873–881Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sabahi N, Razfar MR Investigating the effect of mixed alkaline electrolyte (NaOH+ KOH) on the improvement of machining efficiency in 2D electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):643–657Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soward JW, Ramirez AJ, Dickinson DW, Lippold JC (2010) Characterization of welding fume from SMAW electrodes- Part II. Welding Journal 89:82s–90sGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bacsik Z, Mink J, Keresztury G (2005) FTIR spectroscopy of the atmosphere part 2. Applications Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 40(4):327–390Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tian L, Inthavong K, Lidén G, Shang Y, Tu J (2016) Transport and deposition of welding fume agglomerates in a realistic human nasal airway. Ann Occup Hyg 60(6):731–747Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Meneses VA, Gomes JF, Scotti A (2014) The effect of metal transfer stability (spattering) on fume generation, morphology and composition in short-circuit MAG welding. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1388–1397Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Visser J (1989) Waals and other cohesive forces affecting powder fluidization. Powder Technol 58(1):1–10Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karra VK, Fuerstenau DW (1977) The effect of humidity on the trace mixing kinetics in fine powders. Powder Technol 16(1):97–105Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Halasova E, Baska T, Kukura F, Mazurova D, Bukovska E, Dobrota D, Poliacek I, Halasa M (2005) Lung cancer in relation to occupational and environmental chromium exposure and smoking. Neoplasma. 52(4):287–291Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kawahara M, Kato-Negishi M (2011) Link between aluminum and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: the integration of the aluminum and amyloid cascade hypotheses. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2011:1–17Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY, Lowry GV, Jolivet JP, Wiesner MR (2009) Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4(10):634–641Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang SC, Cassidy A, Christiani DC (2010) A systematic review of occupational exposure to particulate matter and cardiovascular disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7(4):1773–1806Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Latza U, Gerdes S, Baur X (2009) Effects of nitrogen dioxide on human health: systematic review of experimental and epidemiological studies conducted between 2002 and 2006. Int J Hyg Environ Health 212(3):271–287Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brown TP, Rushton L, Mugglestone MA, Meechan DF (2003) Health effects of a sulphur dioxide air pollution episode. J Public Health 25(4):369–371Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPunjab Engineering CollegeChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations