Advertisement

Microstructural evolution and geometrical properties of TiB2 metal matrix composite protrusions on hot work tool steel surfaces manufactured by laser implantation

  • Felix SprangerEmail author
  • Marcelo de Oliveira Lopes
  • Stephan Schirdewahn
  • Julia Degner
  • Marion Merklein
  • Kai Hilgenberg
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The laser implantation–named technique aims to address the tribological problems frequently seen on tool surfaces during hot stamping. It is based on the creation of elevated dome- or ring-shaped hard structures on the surface of tool steels by a localized dispersing of hard particles. Therefore, a combination of the two distinct approaches that are normally used in surface technology for optimizing friction and wear, i.e., surface texturing and surface material optimization, are realized in one processing step. In experimental studies, a localized dispersing of TiB2 particles in the surface layer of the hot work tool steel X38CrMoV5-3 was considered and compared with punctual laser–remelted textures. The structures (micro-) hardness was measured at top- and cross-sections. With the aid of a scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction the interaction between the hard particles and the substrate material were studied. From the results, an optimal parameter range was identified for laser implantation. To the investigation’s end, the implant geometry was measured by optical microscopy and white light microscopy. Furthermore, a mathematic model was introduced, which allows a prediction of the implant geometry as a response to the laser parameters. It was shown that the implantation of TiB2 particles leads to a significant hardness increase up to 1600 HV1 due to the dispersion of initial particles and an in situ precipitation of new titanium-rich phases. It was possible to create defect-free dome- and ring-shaped microstructures on the surfaces. It was also shown that the implants geometry highly depends on the applied laser parameters. The applied central composite design shows a good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

Localized laser dispersing Laser implantation Surface texturing Hot work tool steel Hot stamping TiB2 

Notes

Funding information

Financial funding of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Grant No. HI1919/3-1 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Kwon O, Lee L, Kim G, Chin KG (2010) New trends in advanced high strength steel developments for automotive application. Mater Sci Forum 638–642:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghassemieh E (2011) Materials in automotive application, state of the art and prospects, new trends and developments in automotive industry. Prof. Marcello Chiaberge (Ed.), InTech.  https://doi.org/10.5772/13286 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karbasian H, Tekka A (2010) E (2010) A review on hot stamping. J Mater Process Technol 210:2103–2118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pujante JA (2015) Wear mechanisms in press hardening of boron steel. Dissertation, Universitat Politecnica de CatalunyaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghiotti A, Bruschi S, Sgarabotto F, Bariani PF (2014) Tribological performances of Zn-based coating in direct hot stamping. Tribol Int 78:142–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2014.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghiotti A, Bruschi S, Borsetto F (2011) Tribological characteristics of high strength steel sheets under hot stamping. J Mater Process Technol 211:1694–1700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pelcastre L, Hardell J, Prakash B (2013) Galling mechanisms during interaction of tool steel and Al–Si coated ultra-high strength steel at elevated temperature. Tribol Int 67:263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelcastre L, Hardell J, Prakash B (2011) Investigations into the occurrence of galling during hot stamping of Al-Si-coated high-strength steel. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Special issue paper, pp 487-498.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650111398313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn DG (2013) Hardfacing technologies for improvement of wear characteristics of hot working tools: a review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:1271–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0174-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clarysse F, Lauwerens W, Vermeulen M (2008) Tribological properties of PVD tool coatings in forming operations of steel sheet. Wear 264:400–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birol Y, Isler D (2010) Response to thermal cycling of CAPVD (Al,Cr)N-coated hot work tool steel. Surf Coat Technol 205:275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kondratiuk J, Kuhn P, Labrenz E, Bischoff C (2011) Zinc coatings for hot sheet metal forming: comparison of phase evolution and microstructure during heat treatment. Surf Coat Technol 205:4141–4153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dobrzański L, Bonek M, Hajduczek E, Labisz K, Piec M, Jonda E, Polok A (2008) Structure and properties of laser alloyed gradient surface layers of the hot-work tool steels. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 31:146–169Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Costa H, Hutchings IM (2015) Some innovative surface texturing techniques for tribological purposes. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol 229(4):429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650114539936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholz P, Börner R, Landgrebe D, Müller R, Schubert A (2015) Trockenumformen von Aluminiumblech: Einfluss von Mikrostrukturierungen der Werkzeugaktivteilfläche auf den Gleitreibwert. Dry Metal Form Open Access J 1:159–164Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brosius A, Mousavi A (2016) Lubricant free deep drawing process by macro structured tools. CIRP Ann 65:253–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hilgenberg K, Behler K, Steinhoff K (2014) Localized dispersing of ceramic particles in tool steel surfaces by pulsed laser radiation. Appl Surf Sci 305:575–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hilgenberg K, Rethmeier M, Steinhoff K (2016) Surface structuring by pulsed laser implantation. Mater Sci Forum 879:750–755.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.879.750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hilgenberg K, Steinhoff K (2015) Texturing of skin-pass rolls by pulsed laser dispersing. J Mater Process Technol 225:84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spranger F, Hilgenberg K (2019) Dispersion behavior of TiB2 particles in AISI D2 tool steel surfaces during pulsed laser dispersing and their influence on material properties. Appl Surf Sci 467-468:493–504.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schirdewahn S, Spranger F, Hilgenberg K, Merklein M (2019) Tribological performance of localized dispersed X38CrMoV5-3 surfaces for hot stamping of Al-Si coated 22MnB5 sheets. Oldenburg M, Hardell J, Caellas D (Hrsg.): Hot Sheet Metal Forming of High-Performance Steel - CHS2, Wissenschaftliche Skripten, pp 357-364Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pastor A, Valles P, More W, Medina SF (2017) Toughness improvement of steel X38CrMoV5-1 via alternative manufacturing process and prevention of catastrophic failure in safety parts. Eng Fail Anal 82:791–801.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lerchbacher C, Zinner S, Leitner H (2012) Atom probe study of the carbon distribution in a hardened martensitic hot-work tool steel X38CrMoV5-1. Micron 43:818–826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2012.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Data sheet Abrams Premium Stahl, Online, 12.05.2018: http://www.premium-stahl.de/images/filedownloads/de/datenblaetter/1.2367.pdf
  25. 25.
    Munro R (2000) Material properties of titanium diboride. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 105:709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brereton RG (2003) Chemometrics, data analysis for the laboratory and chemical plant. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ISBNs: 0-471-48977-8 (HB); 0-471-48978-6 (PB)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krell J, Röttger A, Geenen K, Theisen W (2018) General investigations on processing tool steel X40CrMoV5-1 with selective laser remelting. J Mater Process Technol 255:679–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holzweissig MJ, Taube A, Brenne F, Schaper M, Niendorf T (2015) Microstructural characterization and mechanical performance of hot work tool steel processed by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 46:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Preusser J, Oeser S, Pfeiffer W, Temmler A, Willenborg E (2014) Microstructure and residual stresses of laser remelted surfaces of a hot work tool steel. Int J Mater Res 105(4):328–336.  https://doi.org/10.3139/146.111027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bonek M, Dobrzański LA, Hajduczek E, Klimpel A (2006) Structure and properties of laser alloyed surface layers on the hot-work tool steel. J Mater Process Technol 175:45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Sayed SR, Hussein A, Nofal A, Hassab Elnaby SI, Elgazzar H (2017) Characterization of a laser surface-treated martensitic stainless steel. Materials (Basel) 10:595.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gao W, Zhang Z, Zhao S, Wang Y, Chen H, Lin X (2016) Effect of small addition of Ti on the Fe-based coating by laser cladding. Surf Coat Technol 291:423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Du B, Paital SR, Dahotre NB (2013) Synthesis of TiB2-TiC/Fe nano-composite coating by laser surface engineering. Opt Laser Technol 45:647–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heiple CR, Roper JR (1981) Mechanism for minor element effect on GTA fusion zone geometry. Weld J 61(4):97–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Spranger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcelo de Oliveira Lopes
    • 1
  • Stephan Schirdewahn
    • 2
  • Julia Degner
    • 2
  • Marion Merklein
    • 2
  • Kai Hilgenberg
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Federal Institute for Materials Research and TestingBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Manufacturing TechnologyFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Machine Tools and Factory ManagementTechnical University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations