Advertisement

A dynamic two-axis interpolation test with linear and rotary axes in five-axis machine tool

  • Lei Zhong
  • Jianhua Yu
  • Qingzhen Bi
  • Yuhan WangEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a new dynamic two-axis interpolation test method for dynamic accuracy calibration of rotary axis in a five-axis machine tool based on the double ball bar(DBB). The proposed method only requires synchronous movement of a single rotary axis and a single linear axis which is parallel to the average line of the rotary axis. The measurement trajectory is a spatial curve formed by the intersection of spherical and cylindrical surface, which are the reachable operating space of the DBB and the reachable operating space of the two moving axes, respectively. Compared to the circular tests described in ISO10791.6, which need at least three axes to synchronize motion, the proposed method can be effectively applied to the matching of servo parameters and the adjusting of the dynamic errors of the rotary axis, without the interference of additional linear axes. Meanwhile, the error trajectory pattern obtained by this method has the characteristics of orthogonality and regular variation, which is similar to the circular test of linear axis. So it can guide the calibration and optimization of rotating axis conveniently and effectively. Simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively identify the inverse error, scaling mismatch error, servo mismatch error, squareness error, and other error sources of the rotary axis. The proposed method is verified through experiments on a five-axis machine tool.

Keywords

Five-axis machine tool Two-axis interpolation test Rotary axis Dynamic accuracy calibration Double ball bar 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018ZX04005001).

References

  1. 1.
    Xiang S, Yang J (2014) Using a double ball bar to measure 10 position-dependent geometric errors for rotary axes on five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1-4):559–572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6155-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2013) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9-12):2071–2082.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5432-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen GS, Mei XS, Li HL (2013) Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with multi-axes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9-12):2583–2592.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5203-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bringmann B, Maglie P (2009) A method for direct evaluation of the dynamic 3D path accuracy of NC machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):343–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jie L, Xie F, Liu XJ, Dong Z, Song Z, Li W (2017) A geometric error identification method for the swiveling axes of five-axis machine tools by static R-test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9-12):3393–3405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slamani M, Mayer R, Balazinski M, Zargarbashi SHH, Engin S, Lartigue C (2010) Dynamic and geometric error assessment of an XYC axis subset on five-axis high-speed machine tools using programmed end point constraint measurements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(9-12):1063–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2584-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andolfatto L, Lavernhe S, Mayer JRR (2011) Evaluation of servo, geometric and dynamic error sources on five-axis high-speed machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(10-11):787–796.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibaraki S, Yu N (2017) Formulation of the influence of rotary axis geometric errors on five-axis on-machine optical scanning measurement—application to geometric error calibration by “chase-the-ball” test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2:1–11Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zargarbashi SHH, Angeles J (2015) Identification of error sources in a five-axis machine tool using FFT analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5-8):1353–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhong L, Bi Q, Wang Y (2017) Volumetric accuracy evaluation for five-axis machine tools by modeling spherical deviation based on double ball-bar kinematic test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:106–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibaraki S, Oyama C, Otsubo H (2011) Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):190–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhong L, Bi Q, Huang N, Wang Y (2018) Dynamic accuracy evaluation for five-axis machine tools using S trajectory deviation based on R-test measurement. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 125:20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO 10791-6:2014, Test conditions for machining centres. Part 6. Accuracy of speeds and interpolations, ISO, Geneva.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kato N, Tsutsumi M, Sato R (2013) Analysis of circular trajectory equivalent to cone-frustum milling in five-axis machining centers using motion simulator. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 230-4:2005, Test code for machine tools. Part 4. Circular tests for numerically controlled machine tools, ISO, Geneva..Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pahk HJ, Kim YS, Moon JH (1997) A new technique for volumetric error assessment of CNC machine tools incorporating ball bar measurement and 3D volumetric error model. Int J Mach Tool Manu 37(11):1583–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hong SW, Shin YJ, Lee HS (1997) An efficient method for identification of motion error sources from circular test results in NC machines. Int J Mach Tool Manu 37(3):327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lei W-T, Wang W-C, Fang T-C (2014) Ballbar dynamic tests for rotary axes of five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 82-83:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lei WT, Paung IM, Yu C-C (2009) Total ballbar dynamic tests for five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(6):488–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsutsumi M, Yumiza D, Utsumi K, Sato R (2007) Evaluation of synchronous motion in five-axis machining centers with a tilting rotary table. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf 1(1):24–35.  https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.1.24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Zhong
    • 1
  • Jianhua Yu
    • 2
  • Qingzhen Bi
    • 1
  • Yuhan Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.AECC Commercial Aircraft Engine Co., LtdShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations