The influence of welding polarity on mechanical properties, microstructure and residual stresses of gas tungsten arc welded AA5052

  • Ardeshir SarmastEmail author
  • Siamak Serajzadeh


The effect of welding current and polarity, i.e. AC and DCEN, on imposed thermal cycles, mechanical properties, microstructural events and residual stresses was investigated in GTA welding of AA5052. A three-dimensional thermo-mechanical model was utilized to evaluate thermal responses and residual stresses distribution in the weldments. Tensile testing and hardness measurements were also conducted to study the effect of welding polarity on the mechanical properties of components. Microstructural observations utilizing optical microscopy were carried out to assess the microstructural evolutions. The results show that wide varieties of microstructures are produced in DCEN sample from cells at the fusion boundary to equiaxed dendrites at the centre line. However, in the sample welded by AC current, the produced microstructure changes from columnar dendritic at the fusion line to equiaxed dendritic at the centre line. Although, these microstructural changes have no significant effects on the mechanical properties of weld metal. Furthermore, wider temperature contours in the AC sample resulted in a wider heat affected zone, i.e. 9.5 vs. 6.4 mm, and larger tensile residual stresses are produced in the longitudinal direction in the sample welded under DCEN polarity.


Gas tungsten arc welding Thermo-mechanical modelling Welding polarity Thermal cycle Mechanical properties Residual stress 


Funding information

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


  1. 1.
    Goldak JA, Akhlaghi M (2005) Computational welding mechanics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preston RV, Shercliff HR, Withers PJ, Smith SD (2003) Finite element modelling of tungsten inert gas welding of aluminium alloy 2024. Sci Technol Weld Join 8(1):10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spina R, Tricarico L, Basile G, Sibillano T (2007) Thermo-mechanical modeling of laser welding of AA5083 sheets. J Mater Process Technol 191:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barroso A, Cañas J, Picón R, París F, Méndez C, Unanue I (2010) Prediction of welding residual stresses and displacements by simplified models. Experimental validation. Mater Des 31(3):1338–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilles P, El-Ahmar W, Jullien J-F (2009) Robustness analyses of numerical simulation of fusion welding NeT-TG1 application: “single weld-bead-on-plate”. Int J Press Vessel Pip 86(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zeng Z, Wang L, Du P, Li X (2010) Determination of welding stress and distortion in discontinuous welding by means of numerical simulation and comparison with experimental measurements. Comput Mater Sci 49(3):535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bajpei T, Chelladurai H, Ansari MZ (2016) Mitigation of residual stresses and distortions in thin aluminium alloy GMAW plates using different heat sink models. J Manuf Process 22:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magalhães ES, Carvalho SR, de Lima e Silva ALF, Lima e Silva SMM (2015) The use of non-linear inverse problem and enthalpy method in GTAW process of aluminum. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 66:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zain-ul-abdein M, Nélias D, Jullien J-F, Deloison D (2010) Experimental investigation and finite element simulation of laser beam welding induced residual stresses and distortions in thin sheets of AA 6056-T4. Mater Sci Eng A 527(12):3025–3039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeong H, Park K, Baek S, Cho J (2019) Thermal efficiency decision of variable polarity aluminum arc welding through molten pool analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf 138:729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D-k Z, Zhao Y, Dong M-y, Wang G-q, Wu A-p, J-g S, D-y M, X-l L, J-l S, Z-p Z (2019) Effects of weld penetration on tensile properties of 2219 aluminum alloy TIG-welded joints. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 29(6):1161–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis SJ, Alizadeh H, Gill C, Vega A, Murakawa H, El-Ahmar W, Gilles P, Smith DJ, Truman CE (2009) Modelling and measurement of residual stresses in autogenously welded stainless steel plates: part 1—fabrication and modelling. Int J Press Vessel Pip 86(12):798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Danis Y, Lacoste E, Arvieu C (2010) Numerical modeling of Inconel 738LC deposition welding: prediction of residual stress induced cracking. J Mater Process Technol 210(14):2053–2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh RP, Garg RK, Shukla DK (2016) Mathematical modeling of effect of polarity on weld bead geometry in submerged arc welding. J Manuf Process 21:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hernandez M, Ambriz RR, Cortes R, GoMora CM, Plascencia G, Jaramillo D (2019) Assessment of gas tungsten arc welding thermal cycles on Inconel 718 alloy. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 29(3):579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ranjbarnodeh E, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi AH, Hanke S, Fischer A (2011) Finite element modeling of the effect of heat input on residual stresses in dissimilar joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5):649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Committee ASM (1990) ASM handbook, volume 02—properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials, 10th edn. ASM International, Metals ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu XK, Chao YJ (2002) Effects of temperature-dependent material properties on welding simulation. Comput Struct 80(11):967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohandehghan AR, Serajzadeh S (2011) Arc welding induced residual stress in butt-joints of thin plates under constraints. J Manuf Process 13(2):96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De A, DebRoy T (2004) A smart model to estimate effective thermal conductivity and viscosity in the weld pool. J Appl Phys 95(9):5230–5240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deng D (2009) FEM prediction of welding residual stress and distortion in carbon steel considering phase transformation effects. Mater Des 30(2):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15(2):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pavelic V, Tanbakuchi R, Uyehara OA, Myers PS (1969) Experimental and computed temperature histories in gas tungsten arc welding of thin plates. Weld J Res Suppl 48:295s–305sGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gourd LM (1995) Principle of welding technology, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grong Ø (1994) Metallurgical modelling of welding. Institute of Materials, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kou S (2003) Welding metallurgy, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite element methods for continua and structures. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kang SH, Im YT (2007) Thermo-elasto-plastic finite element analysis of quenching process of carbon steel. J Mater Process Technol 192-193:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rokhlin SI, Guu AC (1993) A study of arc force, pool depression and weld penetration during gas tungsten arc weldingGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farzadi A, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi AH (2010) Investigation of weld pool in aluminum alloys: geometry and solidification microstructure. Int J Therm Sci 49(5):809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations