Effects of the die parameters on the self-piercing riveting process

  • Yunpeng Liu
  • Han Li
  • Huan Zhao
  • Xianping LiuEmail author


To facilitate the die selection for new self-piercing riveting (SPR) joint configurations, it is necessary to find out how the critical die geometric parameters influence the SPR process. In this study, a two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric simulation model was developed to numerically study the riveting process. The influences of the die type, the die diameter, the die depth, and the die pip height on the deformation behaviour of the rivet and sheets were systematically studied. Moreover, the flared rivet shank radius and the thickness at the centre of the bottom sheet during the SPR process were first monitored using the developed simulation model. The simulation results revealed that these die parameters have significant influences on the deformation behaviour of the rivet and sheets. The flared rivet shank radius showed an increasing trend with the increment of the die diameter and the die pip height, while it decreased with the increment of the die depth. Furthermore, it was also found that the flaring speed of the rivet shank depended heavily on the filling condition of the die cavity underneath the rivet cavity. A rapid flare of the rivet shank was observed when this space was fully filled.


Self-piercing riveting Die geometries Die type Material deformation FEM 



The authors gratefully acknowledge Jaguar Land Rover for sponsoring this project.


  1. 1.
    Han L, Thornton M, Shergold M (2010) A comparison of the mechanical behaviour of self-piercing riveted and resistance spot welded aluminium sheets for the automotive industry. Mater Des 31:1457–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang Z, Yao Q, Lai J, Zhao J, Jiang Z (2017) Developing a self-piercing riveting with flange pipe rivet joining aluminum sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2315–2328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kochan A (2000) Audi moves forward with all-aluminium cars. Assem Autom 20:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mortimer J (2001) Jaguar uses X350 car to pioneer use of self-piercing rivets. Ind Robot An Int J 28:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li D, Chrysanthou A, Patel I, Williams G (2017) Self-piercing riveting-a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1777–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He X, Xing B, Zeng K, Gu F, Ball A (2013) Numerical and experimental investigations of self-piercing riveting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li D, Han L, Lu Z, Thornton M, Shergold M (2012) Influence of die profiles and cracks on joint buttons on the joint quality and mechanical strengths of high strength aluminium alloy joint. Adv Mater Res 548:398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma Y, Lou M, Li Y, Lin Z (2018) Effect of rivet and die on self-piercing rivetability of AA6061-T6 and mild steel CR4 of different gauges. J Mater Process Technol 251:282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mori K, Abe Y, Kato T (2007) Finite element simulation of plastic joining processes of steel and aluminum alloy sheets. AIP Conf Proc 908:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abe Y, Kato T, Mori K (2008) Self-pierce riveting of three high strength steel and aluminium alloy sheets. Int J Mater Form 1:1271–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jäckel M, Falk T, Landgrebe D (2016) Concept for further development of self-pierce riveting by using cyber physical systems. Procedia CIRP 44:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drossel WG, Jäckel M (2014) New die concept for self-pierce riveting materials with limited ductility. Key Eng Mater 611:1452–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landgrebe D, Jackel M, Niegsch R (2015) Influence of process induced damages on joint strength when self-pierce riveting carbon fiber reinforced plastics with aluminum. Key Eng Mater 651:1493–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoang NH, Porcaro R, Langseth M, Hanssen AG (2010) Self-piercing riveting connections using aluminium rivets. Int J Solids Struct 47:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porcaro R, Hanssen AG, Langseth M, Aalberg A (2006) Self-piercing riveting process: an experimental and numerical investigation. J Mater Process Technol 171:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carandente M (2016) FE simulation of the SPR process to predict joint characteristics: innovation report. University of WarwickGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carandente M, Dashwood RJ, Masters IG, Han L (2016) Improvements in numerical simulation of the SPR process using a thermo-mechanical finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 236:148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han SL, Tang XD, Gao Y, Zeng QL (2015) Effects of friction factors on flat bottom self-pierce riveting joints of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Res Innov 19:S10–S235Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoang N-H, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Westermann I (2013) Failure of aluminium self-piercing rivets: An experimental and numerical study. Mater Des 49:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mucha J (2011) A study of quality parameters and behaviour of self-piercing riveted aluminium sheets with different joining conditions. Stroj Vestnik/Journal Mech Eng 57:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han L, Hewitt R, Shergold M, Chrysanthou A, Stepinski T (2007) An evaluation of NDT for self-pierce riveting. SAE Tech Pap.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Jaguar Land RoverCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations