Advertisement

Determination of hardness-strength and -flow behavior relationships in bulged aluminum alloys and verification by FE analysis on Rockwell hardness test

  • Amir Asgharzadeh
  • Sobhan Alah Nazari Tiji
  • Rasoul Esmaeilpour
  • Taejoon Park
  • Farhang PourboghratEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Determination of mechanical properties in bulged specimens has its own challenges due to their nonhomogeneous geometry. In the present study, a set of empirical hardness-strength-hardening law correlations is proposed to estimate the flow behavior of the bulged specimens. To do so, comprehensive empirical strength-hardness correlations applicable for all aluminum alloys were developed by collecting datasets from 16 individual studies. These relationships were then compared with hardness/strength experimental data obtained from heat-treated AA6061 and AA7075 tubular specimens. Then, a set of empirical models was developed to calibrate the coefficients of the Holloman and Voce type hardening laws by utilizing the measured hardness and strength values. Finally, to assure the validity of the proposed model, Rockwell hardness test, conducted on the bulged AA6061 and AA7075, was simulated. To do so, the generated flow behavior of bulged specimens based on hardness measurement was used as input plastic flow data in Abaqus commercial FE software, and the indentation geometry on bulged Al specimens were then compared to the experiments. Comprehensive linear and second-degree polynomial relationships were regressed on compiled data for ultimate tensile and yield strengths, respectively. Reasonable agreement was achieved between hardness-strength relationships obtained for all Al alloys and processed AA6061 and AA7075 tubular samples, confirming that these relationships are applicable for any Al alloys regardless of product type and process design. Finally, although both Holloman and Voce type hardening laws gave reasonable estimation of flow behavior in Al tubular specimens particularly at high strain values, Voce model provided a better estimation in comparison to Holloman hardening law. The FE analysis of Rockwell hardness test confirmed that the proposed hardness-strength-hardening law relationship based on Voce type hardening rule was sufficiently accurate in predicting the flow curve in bulged 6061 and 7075 Al alloys.

Keywords

Aluminum alloys Bulged specimen Hardness test Hardness-strength-hardening law correlation Finite element analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the U.S. Department of Energy for the support of this project through the DOE award DE-FG02-13ER41974 and DOE DE-EE000597, with United States Automotive Materials Partnership LLC (USAMP).

References

  1. 1.
    (2017) ASM Handbook Volume 8: Mechanical testing and evaluation, ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dick CP, Korkolis YP (2014) Mechanics and full-field deformation study of the Ring Hoop Tension test. Int J Solids Struct 51:3042–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim HS, Sumption MD, Lim H, Collings EW (2012) Analysis of materials properties of niobium tube from the results of a virtual bulge. AIP Conf Proc 1453:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Traphöner H, Clausmeyer T, Tekkaya AE (2018) Material characterization for plane and curved sheets using the in-plane torsion test—an overview. J Mater Process Technol 257:278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simonovski I, Holmström S, Bruchhausen M (2017) Small punch tensile testing of curved specimens: finite element analysis and experiment. Int J Mech Sci 120:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pavlina EJ, Tyne CJV (2008) Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels. J Mater Eng Perform 17:888–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashemi SH (2011) Strength–hardness statistical correlation in API X65 steel. Mater Sci Eng A 528:1648–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Busby JT, Hash MC, Was GS (2005) The relationship between hardness and yield stress in irradiated austenitic and ferritic steels. J Nucl Mater 336:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaško M, Rosenberg G (2011) Correlation between hardness and tensile properties in ultra-high strength dual phase steels—short communication. Mater Eng 18:155–159Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang H, Kano S, Shen J, McGrady J, Zhao Z, Duan Z, Abe H (2018) On the strength-hardness relationships in a Zr-Nb alloy plate with bimodal basal texture microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A 732:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang P, Li SX, Zhang ZF (2011) General relationship between strength and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 529:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bukhanovs’kyi VV, Rudnyts’kyi MP, Kharchenko VV, Mamuzic I (2010) Relationship between hardness and strength characteristics of Cu–Cr microlayer composite material at elevated temperatures. Strength Mater 42:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen Y-L, Chawla N (2001) On the correlation between hardness and tensile strength in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 297:44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Esmaeilpour R, Kim H, Park T, Pourboghrat F, Mohammed B (2017) Comparison of 3D yield functions for finite element simulation of single point incremental forming (SPIF) of aluminum 7075. Int J Mech Sci 133:544–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Costa MI, Rodrigues DM, Leitão C (2015) Analysis of AA 6082-T6 welds strength mismatch: stress versus hardness relationships. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tiryakioğlu M, Robinson JS, Salazar-Guapuriche MA, Zhao YY, Eason PD (2015) Hardness-strength relationships in the aluminum alloy 7010. Mater Sci Eng A 631:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tiryakioğlu M (2015) On the relationship between Vickers hardness and yield stress in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 633:17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haghdadi N, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR (2012) The flow behavior modeling of cast A356 aluminum alloy at elevated temperatures considering the effect of strain. Mater Sci Eng A 535:252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asgharzadeh A, Aval HJ, Serajzadeh S (2016) A study on flow behavior of AA5086 over a wide range of temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 25:1076–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundararajan G, Tirupataiah Y (1994) The hardness-flow stress correlation in metallic materials. Bull Mater Sci 17:747–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pavlina EJ, VanTyne CJ (2014) Uniform elongation and the stress-strain flow curve of steels calculated from hardness using empirical correlations. J Mater Eng Perform 23:2247–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang K, Carsley JE, He B, Li J, Zhang L (2014) Measuring forming limit strains with digital image correlation analysis. J Mater Process Technol 214:1120–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antunes JM, Menezes LF, Fernandes JV (2006) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of Vickers indentation tests. Int J Solids Struct 43:784–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhattacharya AK, Nix WD (1988) Finite element simulation of indentation experiments. Int J Solids Struct 24:881–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Srikant G, Chollacoop N, Ramamurty U (2006) Plastic strain distribution underneath a Vickers indenter: role of yield strength and work hardening exponent. Acta Mater 54:5171–5178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mondal C, Mishra B, Jena PK, Kumar KS, Bhat T (2011) Effect of heat treatment on the behavior of an AA7055 aluminum alloy during ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng 38:745–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang J-G, Ou B-L (2001) Influence of microstructure on the mechanical properties and stress corrosion susceptibility of 7050 Al-alloy. Scand J Metall 30:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozturk F, Sisman A, Toros S, Kilic S, Picu R (2010) Influence of aging treatment on mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 31:972–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    (1990) ASM Handbook Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials., ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chemingui M, Khitouni M, Jozwiak K, Mesmacque G, Kolsi A (2010) Characterization of the mechanical properties changes in an Al-Zn-Mg alloy after a two-step ageing treatment at 70 and 135 C. Mater Des 31:3134–3139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shaeri MH, Salehi MT, Seyyedein SH, Abutalebi MR, Park JK (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7075 alloy processed by equal channel angular pressing combined with aging treatment. Mater Des 57:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tajally M, Huda Z, Masjuki HH (2010) A comparative analysis of tensile and impact-toughness behavior of cold-worked and annealed 7075 aluminum alloy. Int J Impact Eng 37:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar SR, Gudimetla K, Venkatachalam P, Ravisankar B, Jayasankar K (2012) Microstructural and mechanical properties of Al 7075 alloy processed by Equal Channel Angular Pressing. Mater Sci Eng A 533:50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Das P, Jayaganthan R, Chowdhury T, Singh IV (2011) Fatigue behaviour and crack growth rate of cryorolled Al 7075 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528:7124–7132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ebrahimi M, Djavanroodi F, Tiji SAN, Gholipour H, Gode C (2015) Experimental investigation of the Equal channel forward extrusion process. Metals 5:471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ebrahimi M, Gholipour H, Djavanroodi F (2016) A study on the capability of equal channel forward extrusion process. Mater Sci Eng A 650:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mamaghani KR, Kazeminezhad M (2014) The effect of direct- and cross-rolling on mechanical properties and microstructure of severely deformed aluminum. J Mater Eng Perform 23:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fuller CB, Krause AR, Dunand DC, Seidman DN (2002) Microstructure and mechanical properties of a 5754 aluminum alloy modified by Sc and Zr additions. Mater Sci Eng A 338:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jr RC, Coughran B, Traina I, Hernandez A, Scheck T, Etuk C, Peters J, Lee EW, Ogren J, Es-Said OS (2005) On the correlation of mechanical and physical properties of 7075-T6 Al alloy. Eng Fail Anal 12:520–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Guillow SR, Lu G, Grzebieta RH (2001) Quasi-static axial compression of thin-walled circular aluminium tubes. Int J Mech Sci 43:2103–2123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Asgharzadeh
    • 1
  • Sobhan Alah Nazari Tiji
    • 1
  • Rasoul Esmaeilpour
    • 1
  • Taejoon Park
    • 1
  • Farhang Pourboghrat
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Integrated Systems EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations