Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and experimental study of end-milling process of titanium alloy with a cryogenic internal coolant supply

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cryogenic machining is an environmentally friendly process; liquid nitrogen (LN2) is sprayed onto cutting tool to reduce cutting temperature, increasing tool life. Cutting temperature and force were numerically predicted during cryogenic assisted milling with an internal coolant-assisted tool holder (internal cryogenic milling) for Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The influence of LN2 on the material temperature throughout the machining was estimated; a numerical model to simulate the initial temperature of work material was discussed by consideration of LN2 injective mechanism. A modified Johnson-Cook model including the cryogenic temperature range was adopted to model material plasticity. The predictive models were validated based on side-milling test. The predicted values captured the trend of experimental result; the minimum and maximum temperature errors were 0.1% and 8.6%, and those for the cutting force were 0.2% and 34.4%. Moreover, comprehensive experimental studies for the cutting temperature, cutting force, chip morphology, and chip composition were performed to understand the effect of cryogenic cooling condition. In internal cryogenic milling, the cutting temperature and force tended to be lower than dry machining. Based on the morphological analysis of the generated chip, the coefficient of sliding friction at tool-chip interface under the internal cooling was reduced by 21.4% as compared to the dry condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ :

flow stress (MPa)

A :

material model parameter, yield stress (MPa)

B :

material model parameter, strain hardening coefficient

n :

material model parameter, strain hardening exponent

C :

material model parameter, strain rate coefficient

λ, m :

material model parameter, thermal coefficient

ε :

plastic strain

\( {\dot{\varepsilon}}^{\ast } \) :

dimensionless strain rate

T :

temperature variable (°C)

T r :

room temperature (°C)

T m :

melting temperature (°C)

ΔT SZ :

elevated temperature at shear zone by plastic deformation (°C)

ΔT Work :

heat conducted into work material (°C)

β :

proportion value of heat transferred to work material

ρ :

density of work material (kg/m3)

S :

specific heat of work material (J/kg-°C)

t 1 :

cutting depth (m)

w :

machining width (m)

F S :

shear force (N)

Φ:

shear angle (rad)

α n :

rake angle of cutting tool (rad)

V C :

cutting speed (m/s)

K Work :

thermal conductivity of work material (W/m-°C)

ΔT C :

average temperature rise in chip (°C)

θ :

angle in slip-line field (rad)

λ f :

frictional angle (rad)

φ :

rotating angle of cutting tool (rad)

f :

feed (m/rev/tooth)

d R :

radial depth (m)

D Tool :

Diameter of cutting tool (m)

h :

convective coefficient of LN2 (W/m2-°C)

K LN2 :

thermal conductivity of LN2 (W/m-°C)

Pr :

Prandtl number of LN2

Re :

Renold number of LN2

D :

diameter of injective nozzle (m)

A Nozzle :

correlation coefficient of injective nozzle

L :

characteristic distance for LN2 injection (m)

T m p :

temperature of work material at position and time of m and p (°C)

T :

temperature of LN2 (°C)

Fo :

Fourier number

Bi :

Biot number

α Work :

thermal diffusivity of work material (m2/s)

Δt :

time for step simulation (s)

Δx :

distance between adjacent points for step simulation (m)

RPM :

Number of revolutions per minute of cutting tool

ΔT Cryo :

temperature change due to cryogenic heat source (°C)

q Cryo :

cryogenic heat source (W/m2)

V Chip :

cutting speed of chip (m/s)

K 0 :

modified Bessel function with second order of zero

R, R ' , R ' ':

distance from cryogenic heat source (m)

T Chip :

temperature of chip surface (°C)

T LN2 :

temperature of LN2 (°C)

X, x, Z:

Cartesian coordinate representing location of simulated temperature

t ch :

deformed chip thickness (m)

T Work, Machined :

work material temperature at machined surface (°C)

T Material :

temperature of raw material (°C)

ν, δ, Ψ:

temperature factors

ΔT Initial :

temperature change caused by initial temperature reduction (°C)

ΔT Cryogenic − Shear :

temperature change caused by cryogenic heat source at shear zone (°C)

ΔT Cryogenic − Chip :

temperature change caused by cryogenic heat source at tool-chip interface (°C)

ΔT M :

maximum temperature rise in chip (°C)

l Contact :

tool-chip contact length

P1, P2, P3 :

cutting forces in cutting, tangential, radial directions (N)

Cs :

side cutting angle (rad)

F C, F T, F R :

cutting force components (N)

k AB :

shear flow stress at shear zone (Pa)

k Chip :

shear flow stress at tool-chip interface (Pa)

σ AB :

normal flow stress at shear zone (Pa)

σ Chip :

normal flow stress at tool-chip interface (Pa)

i :

inclination angle (rad)

η :

chip flow angle (rad)

F X, F Y, F Z :

cutting forces in x, y, z directions (N)

r f :

cutting ratio

PC :

distance between teeth of serrated chip (mm)

P:

height of serrated chip (mm)

μ :

frictional coefficient at interface of tool and chip

r :

nose radius (m)

d :

cutting depth (m)

Q :

amount of heat transferred (W-s)

Δt C :

time for heat transfer (s)

A C :

area for heat transfer (m2)

T M :

temperature of work material at machined surface (°C)

T n :

temperature of thermocouple at position of n (°C)

d n :

distance between machined surface and thermocouple position of n (m)

References

  1. Castellani C, Lindtner RA, Hausbrandt P, Tschegg E, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Zanoni G, Beck S, Weinberg AM (2011) Bone–implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control. Acta Biomater 7(1):432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee H, Lee S, Park J, Yang M (2018) Friction and wear characteristics of surface-modified titanium alloy for metal-on-metal hip joint bearing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19(6):917–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li N, Chen Y, Kong D (2018) Wear mechanism analysis and its effects on the cutting performance of PCBN insers during turning of hardened 42CrMo. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19(9):1355–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhury S, Bartarya G (2003) Role of temperature and surface finish in predicting tool wear using neural network and design of experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(7):747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Z, Rajurkar K (2000) Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear 239(2):168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong SY, Markus I, Jeong W (2001) New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(15):2245–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SY, Ding Y, Jeong W (2001) Friction and cutting forces in cryogenic machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(15):2271–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park KH, Yang GD, Suhaimi MA, Lee DY, Kim TG, Kim DW, Lee SW (2015) The effect of cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication on end milling of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J Mech Sci Technol 29(12):5121–5126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park KH, Suhaimi MA, Yang GD, Lee DY, Lee SW, Kwon P (2017) Milling of titanium alloy with cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Precis Eng Manuf 18(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(10):1417–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhananchezian M, Kumar MP (2011) Cryogenic turning of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy with modified cutting tool inserts. Cryogenics 51(1):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rotella G, Umbrello D (2014) Numerical simulation of surface modification in dry and cryogenic machining of AA7075 alloy. Procedia CIRP 13:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pu Z, Umbrello D, Dillon O Jr, Lu T, Puleo D, Jawahir I (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic machining of AZ31B magnesium alloy. J Manuf Process 16(2):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nalbant M, Yildiz Y (2011) Effect of cryogenic cooling in milling process of AISI 304 stainless steel. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 21(1):72–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sivalingam V, Sum J, Yang B, Liu K, Raju R (2018) Machining performance and tool wear analysis on cryogenic treated insert during end milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process 36:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou QY, Wang JT (2010) A modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model for Mg–Gd–Y alloy extended to a wide range of temperatures. Comput Mater Sci 50(1):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proc 7th Int Symp Ballistics 54:541–547

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim DY, Kim DM, Park HW (2018) Predictive cutting force model for a cryogenic machining process incorporating the phase transformation of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1-4):1293–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X (1996) Study of the jet-flow rate of cooling in machining Part 1. Theoretical analysis. J Mater Process Technol 62(1-3):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oxley PLB, Young HT (1990) The mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assessing machinability. Ellis Horwood Publisher, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abukhshim N, Mativenga P, Sheikh M (2006) Heat generation and temperature prediction in metal cutting: a review and implications for high speed machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7-8):782–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lazoglu I, Altintas Y (2002) Prediction of tool and chip temperature in continuous and interrupted machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(9):1011–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang Y, Liang SY (2005) Cutting temperature modeling based on non-uniform heat intensity and partition ratio. Mach Sci Technol 9(3):301–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng H, Li X, Wong Y, Nee A (1999) Theoretical modelling and simulation of cutting forces in face milling with cutter runout. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(12):2003–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vyas A, Shaw M (1999) Mechanics of saw-tooth chip formation in metal cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 121(2):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim DM, Lee I, Kim SK, Kim BH, Park HW (2016) Influence of a micropatterned insert on characteristics of the tool–workpiece interface in a hard turning process. J Mater Process Technol 229:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Molinari A, Musquar C, Sutter G (2002) Adiabatic shear banding in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V: experiments and modeling. Int J Plast 18(4):443–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bayoumi A, Xie J (1995) Some metallurgical aspects of chip formation in cutting Ti-6wt.% Al-4wt.% V alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 190(1-2):173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kofstad P, Anderson P, Krudtaa O (1961) Oxidation of titanium in the temperature range 800–1200 C. J Less Common Met 3(2):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaquila I, Passeggi MCG Jr, Ferron J (1996) Temperature effects in the early stages of titanium oxidation. Appl Surf Sci 93(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bermingham M, Kirsch J, Sun S, Palanisamy S, Dargusch M (2011) New observations on tool life, cutting forces and chip morphology in cryogenic machining Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(6):500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the technology innovation program (10053248, Development of Manufacturing System for CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics) Machining) funded by the Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MOTIE) of Korea and the Mid-career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (No. 2018R1A2B3007806).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung Wook Park.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research highlights

We developed the numerical model of end milling with the internal cryogenic cooling.

Experimental validations of cutting forces and temperatures were performed.

Morphologies of the chips were analyzed to observe the friction at tool-chip interface.

The numerical model can capture the trend of the experiments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.Y., Kim, D.M. & Park, H.W. Numerical and experimental study of end-milling process of titanium alloy with a cryogenic internal coolant supply. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 2957–2975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04425-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04425-3

Keywords

Navigation