Advertisement

Chamfer texturing of tungsten carbide inserts applied to turning of grey cast iron

  • Carlos A. A. Leal
  • Alexandre M. AbrãoEmail author
  • Lincoln C. Brandão
  • Carlos E. H. Ventura
  • Berend Denkena
  • Bernd Breidenstein
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

Owing to the relevance of the turning operation to the metal working industry, intensive research is constantly undertaken in order to improve the quality of manufactured products, optimise production time, and reduce costs. Among the investigated topics, texturing of the cutting tool rake face has received increasing attention since it can affect tool life, process forces, and cutting temperature. The contribution of the present work resides in depicting the procedure for laser texturing the cutting edge chamfer of uncoated tungsten carbide inserts aiming at weakening the stability of the seizure region. Moreover, the performance of textured and non-textured tools was assessed when turning grey cast iron. Two parallel columns of dimples with an average diameter of 40 μm and variable distance between rows of dimples (60, 100, and 200 μm) were produced and the turning experiments were carried out dry and with the application of minimal quantity lubrication (MQL). The findings indicated that the lowest values for the turning force components were obtained when cutting with textured tools possessing dimples 100 μm apart and using MQL. Texturing did not affect tool life in dry turning; however, when cutting with MQL, the longest tool lives were obtained using the tools textured with dimples 60 and 100 μm apart. Finally, machined surface roughness was not affected by tool texturing and decreased slightly with the application of MQL.

Keywords

Laser texturing Turning Minimum quantity lubrication Turning force Tool life 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the following Brazilian research agencies: Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement—CAPES (grant no. 10118128) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (grant no. 474374/2013-0).

References

  1. 1.
    Evans CJ, Bryan JB (1999) “Structured”, “textured” or “engineered” surfaces. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol 48:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacAulay GD, Senin N, Giusca CL, Leach RK (2016) Study of manufacturing and measurement reproducibility on a laser textured structured surface. Measurement 94:942–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Obikawa T, Kamio A, Takaoka H, Osada A (2011) Micro-texture at the coated tool face for high performance cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xie J, Luo MJ, Wu KK, Yang LF, Li DH (2013) Experimental study on cutting temperature and cutting force in dry turning of titanium alloy using a non-coated micro-grooved tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 73:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niketh S, Samuel GL (2018) Drilling performance of micro textured tools under dry, wet and MQL condition. J Manuf Processes 32:254–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang K, Deng J, Xing Y, Li S, Gao H (2015) Effect of microscale texture on cutting performance of WC/Co-based TiAlN coated tools under different lubrication conditions. Appl Surf Sci 326:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawasegi N, Sugimori H, Morimoto H, Morita N, Horid I (2009) Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior. Precis Eng 33:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruzzone AAG, Costa HL, Lonardo PM, Lucca DA (2008) Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol 57:750–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang W, Sun J, Luo X, Ritchie JM, Mack C (2011) Investigation of microstructured milling tool for deferring tool wear. Wear 271:2433–2437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enomoto T, Sugihara T, Yukinaga S, Hirose K, Satake U (2012) Highly wear-resistant cutting tools with textured surfaces in steel cutting. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol 61:571–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2013) Crater and flank wear resistance of cutting tools having micro textured surfaces. Precis Eng 37:888–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kümmel J, Braun D, Gibmeier J, Schneider J, Greiner C, Schulze V, Wanner A (2015) Study on micro texturing of uncoated cemented carbide cutting tools for wear improvement and built-up edge stabilisation. J Mater Process Technol 215:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orra K, Choudhury SK (2018) Tribological aspects of various geometrically shaped micro-textures on cutting insert to improve tool life in hard turning process. J Manuf Process 31:502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sawant MS, Jain NK, Palani IA (2018) Influence of dimple and spot-texturing of HSS cutting tool on machining of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mater Process Technol 261:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cui X, Wang D, Guo J (2018) Effects of material microstructure and surface microscopic geometry on the performance of ceramic cutting tools in intermittent turning. Ceram Int 44:8201–8209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal cutting, vol 464, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, WoburnGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rasp W, Hafele P (1998) Investigation into tribology of cold strip rolling. Steel Res 69:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processes 1 - Cutting, RWTH edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-11978-1Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hao X, Chen X, Xiao S, Li L, He N (2018) Cutting performance of carbide tools with hybrid texture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97:3547–3556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2017) Performance of cutting tools with dimple textured surfaces: a comparative study of different texture patterns. Precis Eng 49:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nouioua M, Yallese MA, Khettabi R, Belhadi S, Mabrouki T (2017) Comparative assessment of cooling conditions, including MQL technology on machining factors in an environmentally friendly approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:3079–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos A. A. Leal
    • 1
  • Alexandre M. Abrão
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lincoln C. Brandão
    • 2
  • Carlos E. H. Ventura
    • 3
  • Berend Denkena
    • 4
  • Bernd Breidenstein
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFederal University of São João del-ReiSão João del-ReiBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFederal University of São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil
  4. 4.Institute of Production Engineering and Machine ToolsLeibniz Universität HannoverGarbsenGermany

Personalised recommendations