A multiphase simulation study of electrochemical discharge machining of glass

  • Ketaki Kolhekar
  • Murali SundaramEmail author


Micromachining of glass has gained importance due to numerous applications of glass in microfluidics, optics, electronics, and biotechnology industry. Electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) is an emerging nontraditional process which has the potential for micromachining of glass with minimal surface damages. Material removal during the machining of glass by ECDM involves thermal machining by electrical discharges between the tool and the gas film. The energy of these discharges is influenced by the gas film characteristics and affects the machining results. In this study, a combined approach of finite element simulation and experimentation is used to study the ECDM process to understand the impact of gas film characteristics on the overcut in machining. The multiphase simulation setup incorporates a combined electrochemical system of glass and electrolyte. The changes in the gas film characteristics due to the variations in the level of electrolyte and the corresponding changes in the overcut are studied. It was observed that the gas film thickness increased with an increase in the level of electrolyte and the gas film stability showed an opposite trend. This resulted in an increase in the overcut in the machining with the increase in the level of electrolyte. This trend observed in the simulation was validated with experimentation.


ECDM Finite element simulation Gas film Glass Micromachining Overcut 



This material is based upon the work supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CMMI-1833112). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Liang Y, Dutta SP (2001) Application trend in advanced ceramic technologies. Technovation 21(1):61–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stjernström M, Roeraade J (1998) Method for fabrication of microfluidic systems in glass. J Micromech Microeng 8(1):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takeuchi Y, Sawada K, Sata T (1996) Ultraprecision 3D micromachining of glass. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45(1):401–404. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng Z-P, Cheng W-H, Huang F-Y, Yan B-H (2007) 3D microstructuring of Pyrex glass using the electrochemical discharge machining process. J Micromech Microeng 17(5):960–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang CT, Song SL, Yan BH, Huang FY (2006) Improving machining performance of wire electrochemical discharge machining by adding SiC abrasive to electrolyte. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(15):2044–2050. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jui SK, Kamaraj AB, Sundaram MM (2013) High aspect ratio micromachining of glass by electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM). J Manuf Process 15(4):460–466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolhekar KR, Sundaram M (2018) Study of gas film characterization and its effect in electrochemical discharge machining. Precis Eng 53:203–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundaram M, Chen Y-J, Rajurkar K (2019) Pulse electrochemical discharge machining of glass-fiber epoxy reinforced composite. CIRP Ann 68:169–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abou Ziki JD, Hof LA, Wüthrich R (2015) The machining temperature during spark-assisted chemical engraving of glass. Manuf Lett 3:9–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krötz H, Roth R, Wegener K (2013) Experimental investigation and simulation of heat flux into metallic surfaces due to single discharges in micro-electrochemical arc machining (micro-ECAM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5):1267–1275. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang B, Lan S, Ni J, Zhang Z (2014) Experimental investigation of spark generation in electrochemical discharge machining of non-conducting materials. J Mater Process Technol 214(4):892–898. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goud M, Sharma AK (2017) A three-dimensional finite element simulation approach to analyze material removal in electrochemical discharge machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(13):2417–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fascio V, Langen HH, Bleuler H, Comninellis C (2003) Investigations of the spark assisted chemical engraving. Electrochem Commun 5(3):203–207. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wüthrich R, Hof LA, Lal A, Fujisaki K, Bleuler H, Ph M, Picard G (2005) Physical principles and miniaturization of spark assisted chemical engraving (SACE). J Micromech Microeng 15(10):S268–S275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Min-Seop H, Byung-Kwon M, Sang Jo L (2008) Modeling gas film formation in electrochemical discharge machining processes using a side-insulated electrode. J Micromech Microeng 18(4):045019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haynes WM (2014) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRCGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hassanizadeh M, Gray WG (1979) General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 2. Mass, momenta, energy, and entropy equations. Adv Water Resour 2(4):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikai T, Hashiguchi K (1995) Heat input for crater formation in EDM. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium for Electro-Machining-ISEM XI, EPFL. pp. 163–170Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frank PI, David PD (1981) Fundamentals of heat transfer. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhuvaneswari M, Sivasankaran S, Kim YJ (2011) Effect of aspect ratio on convection in a porous enclosure with partially active thermal walls. Comput Math Appl 62(10):3844–3856. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Avila K, Moxey D, de Lozar A, Avila M, Barkley D, Hof B (2011) The onset of turbulence in pipe flow. Science 333(6039):192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations