Advertisement

Tool wear rate of the PCBN, mixed ceramic, and coated cemented carbide in the hard turning of the AISI 52100 steel

  • Denis BoingEmail author
  • Leonardo Zilli
  • Carlos Ernani Fries
  • Rolf Bertrand Schroeter
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

The hard turning process is generally performed by PCBN or mixed ceramics tools, which have the mechanical properties that withstand the tribological conditions of the process imposed by the hardened machined material. Coated cemented carbides are also an option for hard machining processes, although relying on the coating deterioration. This paper aims to evaluate the tool wear rate in function of the cutting speed in the hard turning of the steel AISI 52100 with a hardness of 50 HRC for three different types of cutting tool materials: coated cemented carbide, mixed ceramic, and PCBN. The methodology applied to assess the tool wear is based on three-dimensional parameters (volumetric) obtained from a focus variation microscope (FVM). The tool wear rate (WRRM) is calculated based on ordinary least squares (OLS) adopting five values of WRM in five machining time intervals. The face turning experiments were performed at four cutting speeds: vc = 120, 150, 187.5, and 234 m/min. At vc = 120 m/min, the PCBN presented the lowest tool wear rate (182 μm3/s); at vc = 150 m/min, the coated cemented carbide (tool wear rate on the coating) had the best performance (417 μm3/s). The mixed ceramic tool presented a better performance at the higher cutting speeds of vc = 187.5 and 234 m/min, 1206 and 1878 μm3/s, respectively. The methodology applied was reliable to understand and discuss the performance of the machining process through the tool wear rate (WRRM), which is based on the volume of removed material from the tool (WRM). The three-dimensional tool wear parameters can also be applied to machining process optimization, cutting tool wear model creation, benchmarking, and development of new cutting tool materials and grades. Furthermore, the methodology can be considered more agile and precise when compared to the current industrial methodology of tool performance evaluation. Thus, this innovative methodology promotes important information for cutting tool manufacturers and for its customers such as automotive and aeronautic industry.

Keywords

Hard turning Tool wear rate PCBN Mixed ceramic Coated cemented carbide Volumetric tool wear parameters 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sandvik Coromant® for supplying the cutting tools and Alicona® for providing resources and discussions in the measurement methods.

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from FAPESC (Foundation for Research and Innovation Support of the Santa Catarina State—Brazil) in the research project “Machining of Hardened Steels – 2015TR304” and from CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

References

  1. 1.
    Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54:22–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60018-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tönshoff HK, Arendt C, Amor RB (2000) Cutting of hardened steel. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 49:547–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63455-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2015) Machining of hardened steel—experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartarya G, Choudhury SK (2012) State of the art in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paulo Davim J (2011) Machining of hard materials. Springer, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-450-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boing D, de Oliveira AJ, Schroeter RB (2018) Limiting conditions for application of PVD (TiAlN) and CVD (TiCN/Al2O3/TiN) coated cemented carbide grades in the turning of hardened steels. Wear. 416–417:54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Oliveira AJ, Diniz AE, Ursolino DJ (2009) Hard turning in continuous and interrupted cut with PCBN and whisker-reinforced cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 209:5262–5270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sales WF, Costa LA, Santos SC, Diniz AE, Bonney J, Ezugwu EO (2009) Performance of coated, cemented carbide, mixed-ceramic and PCBN-H tools when turning W320 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:660–669.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1523-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mir MJ, Wani MF (2017) Performance evaluation of PCBN, coated carbide and mixed ceramic inserts in finish-turning of AISI D2 steel. J Tribol 14:10–31 http://jurnaltribologi.mytribos.org/v14/v14_2.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dosbaeva GK, El Hakim M a, Shalaby M a, Krzanowski JE, Veldhuis SC (2015) Cutting temperature effect on PCBN and CVD coated carbide tools in hard turning of D2 tool steel. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 50:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Paulo Davim J (2009) Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:754–763.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2013) Investigations on machinability aspects of hardened AISI 4340 steel at different levels of hardness using coated carbide tools. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 38:124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poulachon G, Bandyopadhyay B, Jawahir I, Pheulpin S, Seguin E (2003) The influence of the microstructure of hardened tool steel workpiece on the wear of PCBN cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:139–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00170-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boing D, Schroeter RB, de Oliveira AJ (2018) Three-dimensional wear parameters and wear mechanisms in turning hardened steels with PCBN tools. Wear. 398–399:69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 3685:1993 (1993) Tool life testing with single-point turning tools, International Organization for Standardization ISO 3685Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Castro FL, Boing D, Schroeter RB (2018) Tool performance assessment based on three-dimensional tool wear rate. Procedia CIRP 77:638–641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klocke F (2010) Manufacturing processes 1: cutting.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11979-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Angseryd J, Coronel E, Elfwing M, Olsson E, Andrén HO (2009) The microstructure of the affected zone of a worn PCBN cutting tool characterised with SEM and TEM. Wear. 267:1031–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Boing
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leonardo Zilli
    • 2
  • Carlos Ernani Fries
    • 2
  • Rolf Bertrand Schroeter
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technology, Innovation, and Manufacturing CenterBrusque University CenterBrusqueBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory of Precision MechanicsFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations