Advertisement

Reconfigurable machine tools design for multi-part families

  • Sihan Huang
  • Zhaoyi Xu
  • Guoxin WangEmail author
  • Cong Zeng
  • Yan Yan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Reconfigurable machine tools (RMT) are the core facility of reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS), and structure design is the fundamental research involving RMT. The existing prototypes of RMT are limited to a specific part family, which suffers from reconfiguration difficulty and module sustainability issues. Therefore, a design philosophy of RMT for multi-part families with new design principles based on reconfigurability is proposed in this paper. Modularity and integrability are the basic principles, scalability, convertibility, and customization are the primary design principles, and reusability and symmetry are the auxiliary design principles. By implementing the new design principles, a two-step design method of RMT is proposed. First, a basic three-main-module structure, including the base, function arm, and workstation, is created. Second, customized components are selected to customize the functions for a specific part family, which can be reconfigured to meet the demand of other part families using other customized components. A prototype of RMT illustrates the proposed design philosophy to specify the basic three-main-module structure. The basic configurations of the RMT prototype are given, as well. The reconfigurability of the RMT prototype is analyzed from the perspectives of scalability, convertibility, and reconfiguration time. Based on topology optimization, the performance of the RMT prototype is improved. The case study implements milling and turning functions, demonstrating the practicality of the proposed design philosophy, where the processing of typical parts is also analyzed. Furthermore, the reconfiguration process among multi-part families is discussed in the case study.

Keywords

Reconfigurable manufacturing system Reconfigurable machine tools design Design principle Multi-part families Reconfigurability Topology Optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their comments and feedback, which helped us to improve this paper. All authors have approved this manuscript for submission to the journal.

Funding information

The authors acknowledge the supporting funds, the National Ministries (No. JCKY2016602B007), the graduate technological innovation project of Beijing Institute of Technology (Project No. 2017CX10040), and the National Natural Science Foundation, China (No.51105039).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovan F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48(2):527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo ZB, Sheng BH, Zhao XB, Zhao HL, Liu JP, Jiang RZ (2000) Rapidly reconfigurable manufacturing systems. China Mech Eng 11(3):300–303Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyal KK, Jain PK, Jain M (2011) A novel approach to measure machine reconfigurability in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int Daaam Symposium, 23- 2011, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koren Y (2013) The rapid responsiveness of RMS. Int J Prod Res 51(23–24):6817–6827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rösiö C, Säfsten K (2013) Reconfigurable production system design – theoretical and practical challenges. J Manuf Technol Manag 24(7):998–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhakypov Z, Uzunovic T, Nergiz AO, Baran EA, Golubovic E, Sabanovic A (2017) Modular and reconfigurable desktop microfactory for high precision manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(9-12):3749–3759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang SH, Wang GX, Yan Y (2018a) Delayed reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 57(8):2372–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar A, Pattanaik LN, Agrawal R (2019) Optimal sequence planning for multi-model reconfigurable assembly systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100(5-8):1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koren Y, Shpitalni M (2010) Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 29(4):130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):2137–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1-4):729–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saliba MA, Azzopardi S, Pace C, Zammit D (2019) A heuristic approach to module synthesis in the design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9–12):4337–4359 1-23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landers RG, Min BK, Koren Y (2001) Reconfigurable Machine Tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50(1):269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jedrzejewski J, Kwasny W (2017) Development of machine tools design and operational properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1-4):1051–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koren Y, Kota S (1999) Reconfigurable machine tool. US Patent 5943750Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhupia J, Powalka B, Katz R, Ulsoy AG (2007) Dynamics of the arch-type reconfigurable machine tool. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47(2):326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Padayachee J, Bright G (2012) Modular machine tools: design and barriers to industrial implementation. J Manuf Syst 31(2):92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu Z, Xi F, Liu L, Chen L (2017) A method for design of modular reconfigurable machine tools. Machines 5(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gadalla M, Xue D (2016) Recent advances in research on reconfigurable machine tools: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1–15Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kannan M, Saha J (2009) A feature-based generic setup planning for configuration synthesis of reconfigurable machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(9-10):994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asghar E, Zaman UKU, Baqai AA, Homri L (2018) Optimum machine capabilities for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(9-12):4397–4417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benderbal HH, Benyoucef L (2019) Machine layout design problem under product family evolution in reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a two-phase-based AMOSA approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-15Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gauss L, Lacerda DP, Sellitto MA (2019) Module-based machinery design: a method to support the design of modular machine families for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9–12):3911–3936 1-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang YQ, Zhang GP, Han LN (2019) A methodology of setting module groups for the design of reconfigurable machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-15Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li Z, Katz R (2005) A reconfigurable parallel kinematic drilling machine and its motion planning. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 18(7):610–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bi ZM, Lang SY, Verner M, Orban P (2008) Development of Reconfigurable Machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(11–12):1227–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Son H, Choi HJ, Park HW (2010) Design and dynamic analysis of an arch-type desktop reconfigurable machine. Int J Mach Tool Manu 50(6):575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang GX, Huang SH, Shang XW, Yan Y, Du JJ (2016) Formation of part family for reconfigurable manufacturing systems considering bypassing moves and idle machines. J Manuf Syst 41:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang SH, Yan Y (2019) Part family grouping method for reconfigurable manufacturing system considering process time and capacity demand. Flex Serv Manuf J 31(2):424–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang SH, Wang GX, Yan Y, Hao J (2018b) Similarity coefficient of RMS part family grouping considering reconfiguration efforts. IEEE Access 6:71871–71883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Katz R (2007) Design principles of reconfigurable machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(5-6):430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aguilar A, Roman-Flores A, Huegel JC (2013) Design, refinement, implementation and prototype testing of a reconfigurable lathe-mill. J Manuf Syst 32(2):364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Koren Y, Ulsoy AG (2002) Vision, principles and impact of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Powertrain International 14–21.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang GX, Huang SH, Yan Y, Du JJ (2017) Reconfiguration schemes evaluation based on preference ranking of key characteristics of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5-8):2231–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arai T, Aiyama Y, Maeda Y, Sugi M, Ota J (2000) Agile assembly system by “plug and produce”. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 49(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koren Y, Hu SJ, Weber TW (1998) Impact of manufacturing system configuration on performance. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(1):369–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Putnik G, Sluga A, ElMaraghy H, Teti R, Koren Y, Tolio T, Hon B (2013) Scalability in manufacturing systems design and operation: state-of-the-art and future developments roadmap. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):751–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang W, Koren Y (2012) Scalability planning for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 31(2):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Koren Y, Wang W, Gu X (2017) Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1227–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 11(4):403–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maler-Speredelozzi V, Koren Y, Hu SJ (2003) Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang SH, Wang GX, Shang XW, Yan Y (2017) Reconfiguration point decision method based on dynamic complexity for reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS). J Intell Manuf 29(5):1031–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang L, Ma L, Wu D, Zhou Y (2019) A novel integrated process–machine approach for designing customized milling machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1-16Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wen HX, Cui K (2012) Static and dynamic characteristic analysis of high-speed motorized spindle based on ANSYS workbench. Modular Mach Tool Autom Manuf Tech 12:49–52Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhou ZL, Wang GF, Cong M (2012) Finite element analysis and optimization of headstock based on ANSYS workbench. Modular Mach Tool Autom Manuf Tech 3:17–20Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yoon GH (2010) Structural topology optimization for frequency response problem using model reduction schemes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(25-28):1744–1763MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ma YL, Gong Z, Ma C (2014) Structure design of a machining center bed based on topology optimization technique. In Appl Mech Mater 490:580–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu JP, Luo ZB, Chu LK, Chen YL (2004) Manufacturing system design with optimal diagnosability. Int J Prod Res 42(9):1695–1714CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sihan Huang
    • 1
  • Zhaoyi Xu
    • 2
  • Guoxin Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cong Zeng
    • 1
  • Yan Yan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of of Mechanical EngineeringBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations