Advertisement

Study on the influence of tool point angle on ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling of titanium alloy

  • Wei Liang
  • Jinkai Xu
  • Wanfei Ren
  • Qimeng Liu
  • Xu Wang
  • Huadong YuEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

The paper presents simulation and experiment to analyze the thrust force and cutting heat of conventional drilling (CD) and ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling (UAD) with different tool point angles. The HAAS vertical machining center combined with ultrasonic vibrating shank has been used to study the hole quality in drilling of Ti-6Al-4V material without cooling, including surface roughness, residual stress, exit burrs, and tool wear. Stimulation results show that the thrust force and cutting heat can be greatly reduced by applying ultrasonic assistance. An increase in tool point angle will cause the thrust force and cutting heat to increase in varying degrees. On the other hand, the experimental results show that the thrust force and cutting heat are consistent with those obtained in the simulation, and the surface roughness has been reduced accompanied by change in surface topography after UAD. Moreover, the optimal parameters for the minimum surface roughness have been found by orthogonal test. It is observed that the residual compressive stress has been improved effectively in UAD and become a maximum at the tool point angle of 130° in CD and UAD. According to a lot of experiments, the height of the exit burr can be also significantly reduced by UAD and reaches the minimum at the tool point angle of 130°. Results show that UAD is capable of reducing tool wear greatly, and the minimum tool wear rate has been obtained when the tool point angle is 130°. Besides, the rate of such tool wear generally increases if the number of the processed holes exceeds 30.

Keywords

Drilling Ultrasonic vibration Finite element simulation Tool point angle Ti-6Al-4V Drilling quality 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFB1107403), National basic scientific research program (No. JCKY2017208B006), Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Program Supported Project (No. 20180201057GX), Jilin Province Scientific and Technological Development Program (No. Z20190101005JH), and the “111” Project of China (No. D17017).

References

  1. 1.
    Brewer WD, Keith BR, Wallace TA (1998) Titanium alloys and processing for high speed aircraft. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 243:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spur G, Holl SE (1996) Ultrasonic assisted grinding of ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 62:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tawakoli T, Azarhoushang B (2008) Influence of ultrasonic vibrations on dry grinding of soft steel. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48:1585–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ren W, Xu J, Lin J et al (2019) Research on homogenization and surface morphology of Ti-6Al-4V alloy by longitudinal-torsional coupled ultrasonic vibration ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03668-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong G, Zhang H, Zhou M et al (2013) Experimental investigation on ultrasonic vibration-assisted turning of SiCp/Al composites. J Manuf Process 28:999–1002Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Z, Zhang D, Jiang X et al (2016) Study on rotary ultrasonic-assisted drilling of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V) using 8-facet drill under no cooling condition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9593-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong G, Zou L, Zhou M (2013) Experimental investigation on ultrasonic vibration assisted turning of stainless steels with PCD tool. Adv Mater Res 690-693:2026–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen X, Zhao Y (2012) A study of surface roughness variation in ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang X, Zhang X, Zhu X, et al (2017) Study of phase shift control in high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting. IEEE T Ind Electron:1-1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang X, Sui H, Zhang D et al (2018) Study on the separation effect of high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting. Ultrasonics 87:166–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang X, Sui H, Zhang D et al (2017) Feasibility study of high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting titanium alloy. Chin J Mech Eng-En 53:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang X, Sui H, Zhang D et al (2018) An analytical transient cutting force model of high-speed ultrasonic vibration cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3929–3941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J (2018) Reducing edge chipping defect in rotary ultrasonic machining of optical glass by compound step-taper tool. J Manuf Process 32:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J, et al (2018) Experimental study on vibration stability in rotary ultrasonic machining of ceramic matrix composites: cutting force variation at hole entrance. Ceram Int S0272884218311751Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang J, Feng P, Zhang J et al (2017) Investigations on the critical feed rate guaranteeing the effectiveness of rotary ultrasonic machining. Ultrasonics 74:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Astashev VK, Babitsky VI (1998) Ultrasonic cutting as a nonlinear (vibro-impact) process. Ultrasonics 36:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwak YK, Kim SH, Ahn JH (2011) Improvement of positioning accuracy of magnetostrictive actuator by means of built-in air cooling and temperature control. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12:829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feng P, Wang J, Zhang J et al (2017) Drilling induced tearing defects in rotary ultrasonic machining of C/SiC composites. Ceram Int 43:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moghaddas MA, Short MA, Wiley NR et al (2017) Performance of an ultrasonic-assisted drilling module. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017:1–10Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Azarhoushang B, Akbari J (2007) Ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Inconel 738-LC. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47:1027–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh R, Khamba JS (2006) Ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys: a review. J Mater Process Technol 173:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Z, Zhang D, Jiang X (2017) Exit burr in rotary ultrasonic-assisted drilling of titanium alloys. J B Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 43:1380–1386Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pujana J, Rivero A, Celaya A et al (2009) Analysis of ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Ti6Al4V. Int J Mach Tool Manu 49:500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barani A, Amini S, Paktinat H et al (2014) Built-up edge investigation in vibration drilling of Al2024-T6. Utrasonics 54:1300–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang C, Feng P, Wu Z et al (2011) Mathematical modeling and experimental research for cutting force in rotary ultrasonic drilling. Chin J Mech Eng 47:149–155Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lotfi M, Amini S (2017) Experimental and numerical study of ultrasonically-assisted drilling. Utrasonics 75:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Liang
    • 1
  • Jinkai Xu
    • 1
  • Wanfei Ren
    • 1
  • Qimeng Liu
    • 1
  • Xu Wang
    • 1
  • Huadong Yu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Cross-Scale Micro and Nano ManufacturingChangchun University of Science and TechnologyChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations