Advertisement

Processing parameter and transient effects on melt pool geometry in additive manufacturing of Invar 36

  • Chigozie Obidigbo
  • Eric-Paul Tatman
  • Joy GockelEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

The use of additive manufacturing (AM) in tooling enables low production components to be fabricated with lower costs, reduced waste, increased design flexibility, and reduced lead time. Invar 36 is a popular metal tooling material known for its low coefficient of thermal expansion. This work uses thermal finite element modeling as a tool to determine the feasibility of using the Invar 36 in the AM and to investigate the transient effect from a common stripe scanning strategy used in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) AM. Modeling results show that the steady-state melt pool dimensions behave similarly to traditional AM materials with the same base materials when varying process parameters within the range of LPBF. Single bead and multiple laser pass experiments were performed to compare to the modeling results and determine additional transient effects resulting from repeated scans. Results show that the Invar 36 is a suitable material for use in the AM, which will enable rapid tooling for composite structures.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Modeling Melt pool size Invar Steady state Transient 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Jared Speltz from the University of Dayton Research Institute, for assistance in completing the experiments and Luke Sheridan from Wright State University for capturing the melt pool images.

Funding

This paper was prepared with financial support from the State of Ohio through the Ohio Federal Research Network.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclaimer

The content reflects the views of the author and does not purport to reflect the views of Wright State University, Wright State Applied Research Corporation or the State of Ohio.

References

  1. 1.
    Morey B, (2010) "Tooling it up for composites," SME, 1 4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis JR, (2000) "Nickel, cobalt, and their alloys," ASM International.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qiu C, Adkins NJE, Attallah MM (2016) Selective laser melting of Invar 36: Microstructure and properties. Acta Mater 103:382–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yakout M, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC (2019) Density and mechanical properties in selective laser melting of Invar 36 and stainless steel 316L. Addit Manuf 266:397–420Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison N, Todd I, Mumtaz K (2017) Thermal expansion coefficients in Invar processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Sci 52(17):517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yokout M, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC (2018) A study of thermal expansion coefficients and microstructure during selective laser melting of Invar 36 and stainless steel 316L. Addit Manuf 24:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gockel J, Beuth J, Taminger K (2014) Integrated control of solidification microstructure and melt pool dimensions in electron beam wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf 1(1):119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Plotkowski A, Kirka MM, Babu SS (2017) Verification and validation of a rapid heat transfer calculation methodology for transient melt pool solidification conditions in powder bed metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 18:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guillaume CE, "Invar and elinvar," Nobel Lecture, 1920.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fox J and Beuth J, (2013) "Process mapping of transient melt pool response in wire feed e-beam additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V," in Solid freeform fabrication conference, Austin.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montgomery C, Beuth J, Sheridan L and Klingbeil N, (2015) "Process mapping of Inconel 625 in laser powder bed additive manufacturing," in Solid freeform fabrication proceedings.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams JD, Deckard CR (1998) Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyp J 4(2):90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sheridan L, (2016) "An adapted approach to process mapping across alloy systems and additive manufacturing processes," Wright State University Master’s Thesis.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 68:849–866Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Francis Z, (2017) "The effects of laser and electron beam spot size in additive manufacturing processes," Carnegie Mellon University PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical and Materials EngineeringWright State UniversityDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations