Advertisement

Study of surface quality and dust particles emission and dispersion during dry polishing of granite

  • M. N. Saidi
  • V. Songmene
  • J. Kouam
  • A. BahloulEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this article is to understand the surface quality, as well as the emission and dispersion of dust particles generated during dry polishing of granite, with a view to minimizing both surface roughness and dust particles emission by optimizing the parameters of the industrial process. The optimized polishing parameters found must have a good influence on both the surface quality and the dust particles emission. Investigating dust particle dispersion will help with the design of ventilation solutions to capture dust during the polishing process. Results show that the spindle speed and the feed rate of the polishing tool have important influence on the surface quality and the dust particles emission during the dry polishing process. Choosing a spindle speed of approximately 1500 rpm and an average feed rate of 17 mm/s to perform the dry polishing of granite is a good compromise, which leads to minimize dust particles emission while achieving a good surface finish. It is also shown that the dust emitted contaminates in the same way the vicinity and near the polishing tool. The dust particles, emitted during dry polishing of granite, belong to PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 μm in diameter). These particles, once inhaled, easily reach the lung alveolar region and cause serious injuries.

Keywords

Dry polishing of granite Surface quality Dust emission and dispersion Fine and ultrafines particles Statistical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a larger research project on polishing granite funded by the Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité du Travail (IRSST). The authors also wish to thank A. Lacroix Granit (Saint-Boniface, Quebec, Canada) for donating the samples used in the experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Vacek PM, Verma DK, Graham WG, Callas PW, Gibbs GW (2011) Mortality in Vermont granite workers and its association with silica exposure. Occup Environ Med 68(5):312–318.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.054452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McDonald JC, McDonald AD, Hughes JM, Rando RJ, Weill H (2005) Mortality from lung and kidney disease in a cohort of North American industrial sand workers: an update. Ann Occup Hyg 49(5):367–373.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mei001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verma DK, Vacek PM, des Tombe K, Finkelstein M, Branch B, Gibbs GW, Graham WG (2011) Silica exposure assessment in a mortality study of Vermont granite workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 8(2):71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2011.543409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox LAT Jr (2011) An exposure-response threshold for lung diseases and lung cancer caused by crystalline silica. Risk Anal 31(10):1543–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01610.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steenland K, Ward E (2014) Silica: a lung carcinogen. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):63–69.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper J (2012) Global occupational hazard: silica dust. ASME 2012 Int Mech Eng Congr Expo 5(45219):355–360.  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2012-87509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rushton L (2007) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and occupational exposure to silica. Rev Environ Health 22(4):255.  https://doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.2007.22.4.255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmad I, Khan MI, Patil G (2011) Nanotoxicity of occupational dust generated in granite stone saw mill. 2011 Int Conf Nanosci Technol Soc Implic 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/NSTSI.2011.6111990
  9. 9.
    Kusaka T, Nakayama M, Nakamura K, Ishimiya M, Furusawa E, Ogasawara K (2014) Effect of silica particle size on macrophage inflammatory responses. PLoS One 9(3):e92634.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu XP, Huang H, Li Y (2003) Material removal mechanisms in diamond grinding of granite, Part 1: the morphological changes of granite from sawing to grinding. Key Eng Mater 250:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saidi MN, Songmene V, Kouam J, Bahloul A (2015) Experimental investigation on fine particle emission during granite polishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9-12):2109–2121.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7303-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Y, Huang H, Xu XP (2006) Gloss formation and its relationship with roughness in granite grinding. Key Eng Mater 304-305:413–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouam J, Songmene V, Bahloul A (2013) Experimental investigation on PM2.5 particle emission during polishing of granite. Health 05(10):29–35.  https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.510a2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yavuz H, Ozkahraman T, Demirdag S (2011) Polishing experiments on surface quality of building stone tiles. Constr Build Mater 25(4):1707–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yaonan C, Li L, Haiting W, Mingyang W, Yizhi L (2014) Investigations on the dust distribution characteristics of dry milling using inserts with various groove profiles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(1-4):551–562.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6019-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saidi MN, Songmene V, Kouam J, Bahloul A (2018) Rotational and translation-free polishing of granite: surface quality and dust particles emission and dispersion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1):289–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2247-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ROHS (2019) Regulation respecting occupational health and safety. Légis Québec. http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/showdoc/cr/S-2.1,%20r.%2013. Accessed 14 January 2019
  18. 18.
    OSHA (2012) Silica, crystalline, mixed respirable (quartz, cristobalite, tridymite). Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/chemResult.html?RecNo=278. Accessed 06 December 2018
  19. 19.
    Johnson DL, Phillips ML, Qi C, Van AT, Hawley DA (2017) Experimental evaluation of respirable dust and crystalline silica controls during simulated performance of stone countertop fabrication tasks with powered hand tools. Ann Work Expo Health 61(6):711–723.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxx040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Akbar-Khanzadeh F, Milz S, Ames A, Susi PP, Bisesi M, Khuder SA, Akbar-Khanzadeh M (2007) Crystalline silica dust and respirable particulate matter during indoor concrete grinding—wet grinding and ventilated grinding compared with uncontrolled conventional grinding. J Occup Environ Hyg 4(10):770–779.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620701569708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Croteau GA, Guffey SE, Flanagan ME, Seixas NS (2002) The effect of local exhaust ventilation controls on dust exposures during concrete cutting and grinding activities. AIHA journal: a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety 63(4):458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Songmene V, Kouam J, Balhoul A (2018) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on fine and ultrafine particle emission and distribution during polishing of granite. Measurement 114:398–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Company EK (2004) Kodak’s ergonomic design for people at work. Second edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Djebara A (2012) Métrologie des particules ultrafines d’usinage: optimisation de la caractérisation et de la mesure. École de technologie supérieure (Montreal, Quebec, Canada),Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS)QCCanada
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé En Santé Et En Sécurité Du Travail (IRSST)QCCanada

Personalised recommendations