Advertisement

Effect of tool path on cutting force in end milling

  • Kaining Shi
  • Ning Liu
  • Sibao WangEmail author
  • Junxue Ren
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Tool path generation is an important task in end milling. In the existing literature, the tool path pattern/style is determined based on geometric analysis. However, there is little analysis from the viewpoint of machining dynamics/cutting force, which is more related to the final manufacturing performance. Although there are many types of tool paths (e.g., zigzag, spiral, and ISO-scallop tool path), they can be decomposed into a number of circular tool paths with various path radii and cutting angles. Firstly, by investigating chip formation mechanism, the effect of tool path radius on uncut chip thickness is obtained. Analysis shows that tool path radius has a significant influence on uncut chip thickness, thus affecting the cutting force, especially when the tool path radius is small. Then, the effect of cutting angle on cutting force distribution is analyzed. It is found that the feed direction could vary the distribution of cutting force in X and Y direction in 3-axis end milling. Based on such analysis, the cutting force prediction model considering tool path effect is established. To validate the proposed model, various experiments have been carried out based on well-designed tool paths. The comparative results show that (1) tool path has great effect on cutting force through the tool path radius, rotation direction, and start/end point, and (2) the proposed model is capable of providing accurate cutting force prediction considering tool path effect. From a physical viewpoint, the proposed method provides huge potential in automated/intelligent tool path optimization towards better surface quality via minimizing cutting force, which significantly contributes to the state of the art in tool path generation.

Keywords

Linear tool path Circular tool path Cutting force End milling Tool path generation 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No.2018ZX04005001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2018CDQYJX0013) and (No.G2019KY05206).

References

  1. 1.
    Zhu K, Zhang Y (2017) Modeling of the instantaneous milling force per tooth with tool run-out effect in high speed ball-end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 118–119:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li L, Deng X, Zhao J, Fu Z, Sutherland JW (2018) Multi-objective optimization of tool path considering efficiency, energy-saving and carbon-emission for free-form surface milling. J Clean Prod 172:3311–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geng L, Zhang YF, Fuh JYH (2011) A neural network based approach to 5-axis tool-path length estimation for optimal multi-cutter selection. Comput Aided Des Appl 8(2):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geng L, Liu PL, Liu K (2015) Optimization of cutter posture based on cutting force prediction for five-axis machining with ball-end cutters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5-8):1289–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Held M, Spielberger C (2009) A smooth spiral tool path for high speed machining of 2D pockets. Butterworth-Heinemann 41(7):539–550Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hui W, Wu J, Chao L, Xiong Z (2018) A real-time interpolation strategy for transition tool path with C2 and G2 continuity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1-4):905–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lasemi A, Xue D, Gu P (2012) A freeform surface manufacturing approach by integration of inspection and tool path generation. Int J Prod Res 50(23):6709–6725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chu CH, Wu PH, Lei WT (2012) Tool path planning for 5-axis flank milling of ruled surfaces considering CNC linear interpolation. J Intell Manuf 23(3):471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chu CH, Huang WN, Li YW (2012) An integrated framework of tool path planning in 5-axis machining of centrifugal impeller with split blades. J Intell Manuf 23(3):687–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li LL, Zhang YF, Li HY, Geng L (2011) Generating tool-path with smooth posture change for five-axis sculptured surface machining based on cutter’s accessibility map. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5-8):699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wan XJ, Hua L, Wang XF, Peng QZ, Qin XP (2011) An error control approach to tool path adjustment conforming to the deformation of thin-walled workpiece. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tien KW (2011) Efficient tool path planning for 5-axis flank milling of ruled surfaces using ant colony system algorithms. Int J Prod Res 49(6):1557–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fan W, Gao XS, Lee CH, Zhang K, Zhang Q (2013) Time-optimal interpolation for five-axis CNC machining along parametric tool path based on linear programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5-8):1373–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tunc LT, Stoddart D (2017) Tool path pattern and feed direction selection in robotic milling for increased chatter-free material removal rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9):2907–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen L, Li Y, Tang K (2018) Variable-depth multi-pass tool path generation on mesh surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5-8):2169–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim HC (2011) Tool path generation and modification for constant cutting forces in direction parallel milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(9-12):937–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang SB (2015) Automated five-axis tool path generation based on dynamic analysis. PHD Thesis National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi KN, Wang SB, Liu N, Ren JX, Yuan Y (2019) Experimental and theoretical investigation of milling tool selection towards energy-efficient process planning in discrete parts manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03960-3
  19. 19.
    Zeroudi N, Fontaine M, Necib K (2012) Prediction of cutting forces in 3-axes milling of sculptured surfaces directly from CAM tool path. J Intell Manuf 23(5):1573–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manav C, Bank HS, Lazoglu I (2013) Intelligent toolpath selection via multi-criteria optimization in complex sculptured surface milling. J Intell Manuf 24(2):349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banerjee A, Bordatchev EV (2012) Effect of circular tool path on cutting force profile in micro-end-milling. Arch Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 1989-1996 (vols 203-210) 226(6):1589–1600Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kardes N, Altintas Y (2007) Mechanics and dynamics of the circular milling process. J Manuf Sci Eng 129(1):21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma JW, Hu GQ, Jia ZY, Zhang N, Wang FJ (2018) Effect of geometric feature and cutting direction on variation of force and vibration in high-speed milling of TC4 curved surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5-8):2207–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Da Silva RHL, Hassui A (2018) Cutting force and surface roughness depend on the tool path used in side milling: an experimental investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1-4):1445–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gok A, Gologlu C, Demirci HI (2013) Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5-8):1063–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toh CK (2003) Tool life and tool wear during high-speed rough milling using alternative cutter path strategies. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 217(9):1295–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shi KN, Zhang DH, Liu N, Wang SB, Ren JX, Wang SL (2018) A novel energy consumption model for milling process considering tool wear progression. J Clean Prod 184:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu N, Zhang YF, Lu WF (2015) A hybrid approach to energy consumption modelling based on cutting power: a milling case. J Clean Prod 104:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi KN, Ren JX, Wang SB, Liu N, Liu ZM, Zhang DH, Lu WF (2019) An improved cutting power-based model for evaluating total energy consumption in general end milling process. J Clean Prod 231:1330–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang S, Geng L, Zhang Y, Liu K, Ng TE (2016) Chatter-free cutter postures in five-axis machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 230:1428–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang S, Geng L, Zhang Y, Liu K, Ng TE (2015) Cutting force prediction for five-axis ball-end milling considering cutter vibrations and run-out. Int J Mech Sci 96:206–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical University (NPU)Xi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Department of Mechanical EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations