Advertisement

Review of mechanisms and deformation behaviors in 4D printing

  • Han Ding
  • Xiang Zhang
  • Yong LiuEmail author
  • Seeram Ramakrishna
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Although 3D printing was invented in 1984, it was not until recent years that it captured the imagination of everyone from industry experts to at-home hobbyists. Three-dimensional printing, also known as additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping, constructs an object by accumulating materials layer by layer. In recent years, 3D printing technology has been dramatically developed with respect to materials, printer, and process, which laid a foundation for 4D printing. Four-dimensional printing is the targeted evolution of the 3D-printed structure, concerning shape, property, and functionality. The object is produced by 3D printing firstly. Then, the object can self-deform, self-assemble, self-disassemble, self-repair, and change property or functionality over time when the external stimuli are imposed on it. This review mainly introduces the stimulus, types of shape-shifting behaviors, mechanisms of deformation, and applications of 4D printing.

Keywords

3D printing 4D printing Self-deform Types of shape-shifting Mechanisms of deformation 

Notes

Funding information

The paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant Number 21374008).

References

  1. 1.
    Tibbits, Skylar, McKnelly, Carrie, Olguin, Carlos, Dikovsky, Daniel, Hirsch, Shai (2014) 4D printing and universal transformation. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, Los Angeles. pp 539–548Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooks M (2016) The day the world became 3D. New Sci 232:40–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller R (2014) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): past, present and future. Ind Heat 82:39–43Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Donnell J, Ahmadkhanlou F, Yoon HS, Washington G (2014) All-printed smart structures: a viable option? SPIE Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, California, United States. 905729.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2045284
  5. 5.
    Wang SP, Ragan-Kelley J, Matusik W (2013) OpenFab: a programmable pipeline for multi-material fabrication. ACM T Graphic 32:136.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2461912.2461993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li X, Shang J, Wang Z (2017) Intelligent materials: a review of applications in 4D printing. Assembly Autom 37:170–185.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-11-2015-093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Espalin D, Muse DW, Macdonald E, Wicker RB (2014) 3D printing multifunctionality: structures with electronics. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 72:963–978.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5717-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang Y, Chen Y, Wei Y, Li Y (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 84:2079–2095.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7843-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seliktar D, Dikovsky D, Napadensky E (2013) Bioprinting and tissue engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Isr. J. Chem. 53:795–804.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 67:1191–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32:773.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F Momeni, MMHN Seyed, X Liu, J Ni (2017) A review of 4D printing. Mater Design 122:42–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Rijff BL, Khang G (2015) A building-block approach to 3D printing a multichannel, organ-regenerative scaffold. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11:1403.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y, Williams CB, Wang CCL, Shin YC, Zhang S, Zavattieri PD (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput. Aided Design 69:65–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lipson H, Kurman M (2013) Fabricated: the new world of 3D printing. Wiley Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monzón MD, Paz R, Pei E, Ortega F, Suárez LA, Ortega Z, Alemán ME, Plucinski T, Clow N (2016) 4D printing: processability and measurement of recovery force in shape memory polymers. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 5–8:1827–1836.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9233-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jin Choi OKWJ (2015) 4D printing technology: a review. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2:159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S Tibbits. (2013). The emergence of “4D printing”. Paper presented at the TED conferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou Y, Huang WM, Kang SF, Wu XL, Lu HB, Fu J, Cui H (2015) From 3D to 4D printing: approaches and typical applications. J Mech Sci Technol 29:4281–4288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0925-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pei E (2014) 4D printing: dawn of an emerging technology cycle. Assembly Autom 34:310–314.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-07-2014-062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2013) Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103:68–225.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhong XK, Teoh JEM, Liu Y, Chua CK, Yang S, An J, Leong KF, Yeong WY (2015) 3D printing of smart materials: a review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:103–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1097054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Campbell TA, Tibbits S, Garrett B (2014) The programmable world. Sci. Am. 311:60–65.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1114-60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ge Q, Dunn CK, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2014) Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 23:94007.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/094007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pei E (2014) 4D printing—revolution or fad? Assembly Autom 34:123–127.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-02-2014-014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tibbits S, Cheung K (2012) Programmable materials for architectural assembly and automation. Assembly Autom 32:216–225.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151211244348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu C, Qin H, Mather PT (2007) Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J Mater Chem 17:1543–1558.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b615954k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sun L, Huang WM, Ding Z, Zhao Y, Wang CC, Purnawali H, Tang C (2012) Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review. Mater. Design 33:577–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meng H, Li G (2013) A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites. Polymer 54:2199–2221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menges A, Tibbits S (2012) Design to self-assembly. Archit Des 82:68–73.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 16:2193–2204.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tibbits S (2014) 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit Des 84:116–121.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun K, Wei TS, Ahn BY, Seo JY, Shen JD, Lewis JA (2013) 3D printing of interdigitated Li-ion microbattery architectures. Adv. Mater. 25:4539–4543.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hardin JO, Ober TJ, Valentine AD, Lewis JA (2015) 3D printing: microfluidic printheads for multimaterial 3D printing of viscoelastic inks (Adv. Mater. 21/2015). Adv. Mater. 27:3278.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201500222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhou J, Sheiko SS (2016) Reversible shape-shifting in polymeric materials. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 54:1365–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gong XL, Xiao YY, Pan M, Kang Y, Li BJ, Zhang S (2016) pH- and thermal-responsive multi-shape memory hydrogel. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:27432–27437.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xie T (2010) Tunable polymer multi-shape memory effect. Nature 464:267–270.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang WM, Yang B, Zhao Y, Ding Z (2010) Thermo-moisture responsive polyurethane shape-memory polymer and composites: a review. J Mater Chem 20:3367–3381.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B922943D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hager MD, Bode S, Weber C, Schubert US (2015) Shape memory polymers: past, present and future developments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 49–50:3–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huang WM, Song CL, Fu YQ, Wang CC, Zhao Y, Purnawali H, Lu HB, Tang C, Ding Z, Zhang JL (2013) Shaping tissue with shape memory materials. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65:515–535.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang WM, Zhao Y, Wang CC, Ding Z, Purnawali H, Tang C, Zhang JL (2012) Thermo/chemo-responsive shape memory effect in polymers: a sketch of working mechanisms, fundamentals and optimization. J. Polym. Res. 19:9952.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-9952-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sun L, Huang WM (2010) Mechanisms of the multi-shape memory effect and temperature memory effect in shape memory polymers. Soft Matter 6:4403–4406.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm00236d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yu K, Xie T, Leng J, Ding Y, Qi HJ (2012) Mechanisms of multi-shape memory effects and associated energy release in shape memory polymers. Soft Matter 8:5687–5695.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SM25292A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thérien-Aubin H, Wu ZL, Nie Z, Kumacheva E (2013) Multiple shape transformations of composite hydrogel sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135:4834–4839.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja400518c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li H, Gao X, Luo Y (2016) Multi-shape memory polymers achieved by the spatio-assembly of 3D printable thermoplastic building blocks. Soft Matter 12:3226.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm00185h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Z Long (2015) Lu Bingheng: let 3D print more intelligent. D Manuf Ind 4:22–24Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Behl M, Lendlein A (2010) Triple-shape polymers. J Mater Chem 20:3335–3345.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b922992b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhao Q, Qi HJ, Xie T (2015) Recent progress in shape memory polymer: new behavior, enabling materials, and mechanistic understanding. Prog. Polym. Sci. 49–50:79–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oxman N (2011) Variable property rapid prototyping. Virtual Phys Prototyp 6:3–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2011.558588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    S Miyashita, SP Guitron, M Ludersdorfer, CR Sung, DL Rus (2015) An untethered miniature origami robot that self-folds, walks, swims, and degrades. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), USA.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139386
  51. 51.
    Mao Y, K Y, Isakov MS, Wu J, Dunn ML, Jerry QH (2015) Sequential self-folding structures by 3D printed digital shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep.-UK 5:13616.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yu K, Dunn ML, Qi HJ (2015) Digital manufacture of shape changing components. Extreme Mech Lett 4:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2015.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kuksenok O, Balazs AC (2015) Stimuli-responsive behavior of composites integrating thermo-responsive gels with photo-responsive fibers. Mater Horiz 3:53–62.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MH00212E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bakarich SE, Gorkin R, Panhuis MIH, Spinks GM (2015) 4D printing with mechanically robust, thermally actuating hydrogels. Macromol. Rapid Comm. 36:1211–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201500079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sydney GA, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA (2016) Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15:413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wu J, Yuan C, Ding Z, Michael I, Mao Y, Wang T, Dunn ML, Qi HJ (2016) Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep.-UK 6:24224.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jacobsen M (2016) Clearing the way for pivotal 21st-century innovation. SensePublishers, RotterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    S Naficy, R Gately, R Gorkin, H Xin, GM Spinks (2017) 4D printing of reversible shape morphing hydrogel structures. Macromolecular Materials & Engineering 302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nadgorny M, Xiao Z, Chen C, Connal LA (2016) 3D-printing of pH-responsive and functional polymers on an affordable desktop printer. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b07388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Raviv D, Zhao W, Mcknelly C, Papadopoulou A, Kadambi A, Shi B, Hirsch S, Dikovsky D, Zyracki M, Olguin C (2014) Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations. Sci Rep 4:7422.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gao B, Yang Q, Zhao X, Jin G, Ma Y, Xu F (2016) 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 34:746–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Villar G, Graham AD, Bayley H (2013) A tissue-like printed material. Science 340:48–52.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jamal M, Kadam SS, Xiao R, Jivan F, Onn TM, Fernandes R, Nguyen TD, Gracias DH (2013) Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2:1142–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dimitri K, Manuel S, Studart AR (2015) Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials. Nat. Commun. 6:8643.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Quan Z, Z Kai GH (2016) Smart three-dimensional lightweight structure triggered from a thin composite sheet via 3D printing technique. Sci Rep 6:22431.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Richards DJ, Tan Y, Jia J, Yao H, Mei Y (2013) 3D printing for tissue engineering. Isr. J. Chem. 53:805–814.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bogue R (2013) 3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing? Assembly Autom. 33:307–311.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-06-2013-055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater. Today 16:496–504.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wilhelm S, Curbach M (2015) Review of possible mineral materials and production techniques for a building material on the moon. Struct. Concrete 15:419–428.  https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ivanova O, Williams C, Campbell T (2013) Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyping J. 19:353–364.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2011-0127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Whitesides GM, Grzybowski B (2002) Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295:2418–2421.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Li J (2010) Thermomechanical characterization of environmentally conditioned shape memory polymer using nanoindentation. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 7644:1555–1561.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.846974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lendlein A, Kelch S (2005) Shape-memory polymers as stimuli-sensitive implant materials. Clin Hemorheol Micro 32:105–116Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Chua CK, Yeong WY (2015) Bioprinting: principles and applications. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Khademhosseini A, Langer R (2016) A decade of progress in tissue engineering. Nat. Protoc. 11:1775–1781.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jung JP, Bhuiyan DB, Ogle BM (2016) Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting. Biomaterials Research 20:27.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Visser J, FPW M, Jeon JE (2015) Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres. Nature Communications. 6:6933.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Stoychev G, Puretskiy N, Ionov L (2011) Self-folding all-polymer thermoresponsive microcapsules. Soft Matter 7:3277–3279.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SM05109A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    He H, Guan J, Lee JL (2006) An oral delivery device based on self-folding hydrogels. J Control Release Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society 110:339–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sun L, Huang WM (2010) Thermo/moisture responsive shape-memory polymer for possible surgery/operation inside living cells in future. Materials & Design (1980–2015) 31:2684–2689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Anand LAME, Ames NM, Srivastava V, Chester SA (2009) A thermo-mechanically coupled theory for large deformations of amorphous polymers. Part I: formulation. Int. J. Plasticity 25:1474–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.004 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yakacki CM, Shandas R, Safranski D, Ortega AM, Sassaman K, Gall K (2008) Strong, tailored, biocompatible shape-memory polymer networks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18:2428–2435.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200701049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yakacki CM, Shandas R, Lanning C, Rech B, Eckstein A, Gall K (2007) Unconstrained recovery characterization of shape-memory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications. Biomaterials 28:2255–2263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    G Qi, SA Hosein, L Howon, CK Dunn, NX Fang, ML Dunn (2016) Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep.-UK 6: 31110. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31110
  86. 86.
    Bodaghi M, Damanpack AR, Liao WH (2016) Self-expanding/shrinking structures by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 25.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Zarek M, Mansour N, Shapira S, Cohn D (2017) 4D printing of shape memory-based personalized endoluminal medical devices. Macromol. Rapid Comm. 38:1600628.  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201600628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zarek M, Layani M, Cooperstein I, Sachyani E, Cohn D, Magdassi S (2016) 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. Adv. Mater. 28:4449.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    J Rossiter, P Walters, B Stoimenov. Printing 3D dielectric elastomer actuators for soft robotics. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, California, United States. pp 72870H-72870H-10.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.815746
  90. 90.
    Bauer S, Bauer-Gogonea S, Graz I, Kaltenbrunner M, Keplinger C, Schwã Diauer R (2014) 25th anniversary article: A soft future: from robots and sensor skin to energy harvesters. Adv. Mater. 26:149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201303349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ahn SH, Lee KT, Kim HJ, Wu R, Kim JS, Song SH (2012) Smart soft composite: an integrated 3D soft morphing structure using bend-twist coupling of anisotropic materials. Int J Precis Eng Man 13:631–634.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0081-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Chu WS, Lee KT, Song SH, Han MW, Lee JY, Kim HS, Kim MS, Park YJ, Cho KJ, Ahn SH (2012) Review of biomimetic underwater robots using smart actuators. Int J Precis Eng Man 13:1281–1292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0171-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    S Mondal JLH (2006) Temperature stimulating shape memory polyurethane for smart clothing. Indian J. Fibre Text. 31:66–71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Polymer CompositesBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Nanoscience and Nanotechnology InitiativeNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations