Advertisement

Fault diagnosis system of bridge crane equipment based on fault tree and Bayesian network

  • Yu ZhengEmail author
  • Fei Zhao
  • Zheng Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
First Online:

Abstract

A spreader is an important part of a crane used on wharfs for loading and unloading operations. Because of the spreader’s complex structure, poor operation environment, frequent collision accidents, etc., breakdowns and faults often occur, and the causes for the faults are complex. Based on the historical fault data of the spreaders accumulated during their online service for 13 years, by determining top events and boundary conditions using the induction and deduction methods, a complete spreader fault tree is built with three layers of fault phenomena, fault classification, and fault causes. Then, based on the fault tree, a Bayesian network for the spreader fault diagnosis is constructed by establishing the transformation algorithm from the fault tree to the Bayesian network. The junction tree method is used for accurate inference of spreader faults based on the Bayesian network. Finally, a spreader fault diagnosis system is developed, and a case verification is carried out. The system would be of great help to crane operation engineers in fault diagnosis, and it effectively uses historical fault data to support subsequent maintenance.

Keywords

Fault diagnosis system Fault tree Bayesian network Crane 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505286) and the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2015BAF18B02).

References

  1. 1.
    Isermann R (2006) Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yazici B, Kliman GB (1999) An adaptive statistical time-frequency method for detection of broken bars and bearing faults in motors using stator current. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 35(2):442–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yen GG, Lin KC (2000) Wavelet packet feature extraction for vibration monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 47(3):650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu B, Ling SF, Meng Q (1997) Machinery diagnosis based on wavelet packets. J Vib Control 3(1):5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lopez JE, Yeldham IA, Oliver K (1996) Overview of wavelet/neural network fault diagnostic methods applied to rotating machinery. AlphaTech Inc., BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin SJ (2014) Process data analytics in the era of big data. AICHE J 60(9):3092–3100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frankel F, Reid R (2008) Big data: distilling meaning from data. Nature 455(7209):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen XW, Lin X (2014) Big data deep learning: challenges and perspectives. IEEE Access 2:514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yin S, Ding SX, Haghani A, Hao H, Zhang P (2012) A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process. J Process Control 22(9):1567–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bodla MK, Malik SM, Rasheed MT, Numan M, Ali MZ, Brima JB (2016) Logistic regression and feature extraction based fault diagnosis of main bearing of wind turbines. In: Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2016 IEEE 11th Conference on. IEEE, pp 1628–1633Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muralidharan V, Sugumaran V (2013) Feature extraction using wavelets and classification through decision tree algorithm for fault diagnosis of mono-block centrifugal pump. Measurement 46(1):353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hui KH, Ooi CS, Lim MH, Leong MS (2016) A hybrid artificial neural network with Dempster-Shafer theory for automated bearing fault diagnosis. J Vibroeng 18(7):4409–4418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    FernáNdez-Francos D, MartíNez-Rego D, Fontenla-Romero O, Alonso-Betanzos A (2013) Automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on one-class ν-SVM. Comput Ind Eng 64(1):357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai B, Liu Y, Fan Q, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Yu S, Ji R (2014) Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network. Appl Energy 114:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jun, H. B., Kiritsis, D., & Xirouchakis, P. (2015). A prognostic decision support algorithm for a heavy construction vehicle maintenance scheduleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qiu H, Lee J, Lin J, Yu G (2006) Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on rolling element bearing prognostics. J Sound Vib 289(4–5):1066–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madhikermi M, Yousefnezhad N, Främling K (2018, August) Heat recovery unit failure detection in air handling unit. In: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems. Springer, Cham, pp 343–350Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin Z, Hou J (2016) Recent advances on SVM based fault diagnosis and process monitoring in complicated industrial processes. Neurocomputing 174:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kankar PK, Sharma SC, Harsha SP (2011) Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using machine learning methods. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1876–1886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saimurugan M, Ramachandran KI, Sugumaran V, Sakthivel NR (2011) Multi component fault diagnosis of rotational mechanical system based on decision tree and support vector machine. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3819–3826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tayarani-Bathaie SS, Vanini ZS, Khorasani K (2014) Dynamic neural network-based fault diagnosis of gas turbine engines. Neurocomputing 125:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saravanan N, Siddabattuni VK, Ramachandran KI (2010) Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using artificial neural network (ANN), and proximal support vector machine (PSVM). Appl Soft Comput 10(1):344–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang M, Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D (2014) Investigation of haul truck-related fatal accidents in surface mining using fault tree analysis. Saf Sci 65:106–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruijters E, Stoelinga M (2015) Fault tree analysis: a survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools. Comput Sci Rev 15:29–62MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mentes A, Helvacioglu IH (2011) An application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for spread mooring systems. Ocean Eng 38(2–3):285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chanda RS, Bhattacharjee PK (1998) A reliability approach to transmission expansion planning using fuzzy fault-tree model. Electr Power Syst Res 45(2):101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Batzias A, Batzias F (2003) Fuzzy fault tree analysis as a mechanism for technical support to small/medium electroplaters on a quasi online/real-time basis. In: Industrial Technology, 2003 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 1, pp 36–41Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin CT, Wang MJJ (1997) Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58(3):205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible reasoningzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee YK, Mavris DN, Volovoi VV, Yuan M, Fisher T (2010) A fault diagnosis method for industrial gas turbines using Bayesian data analysis. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 132(4):041602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jin S, Liu Y, Lin Z (2012) A Bayesian network approach for fixture fault diagnosis in launch of the assembly process. Int J Prod Res 50(23):6655–6666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yongli Z, Limin H, Jinling L (2006) Bayesian networks-based approach for power systems fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 21(2):634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen B, Tavner PJ, Feng Y, Song WW, Qiu YN (2012) Bayesian network for wind turbine fault diagnosis. Copenhagen: EWEAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing and Information Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Key Lab of Advanced ManufacturingShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of AutomationSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options