Advertisement

Additive manufacturing for space: status and promises

  • Enea Sacco
  • Seung Ki MoonEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 509 Downloads

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing is a manufacturing technique where successive layers of material are layered to produce parts. The design freedom afforded by AM is ideal for the space industry, where part production is low volume and highly customized. The objective of this paper is to review research in the area of additive manufacturing for space (AMFS) in all areas, from propulsion to electronics to printing of habitats, and to identify the gaps and directions in the research. In this paper, we investigate the AMFS research by splitting it into two domains: space and ground-based. Space-based AMFS has been performed on the International Space Station using polymers, and we also discuss the future of in space AM, a subject closely related to more general in space manufacturing. The ground-based research is split into three categories based on the printing material: metal, polymer, and others. The last category includes regolith, cement, and ceramic. This paper explores AMFS by bringing together as much research information as possible using a combination of papers, presentations, and news articles. We expect that the paper will allow the reader to gain an understanding of the current status of AMFS research and will contribute to the field as a reference and research guidelines.

Keywords

3D printing Additive manufacturing AM certification Satellite Space Spacecraft 

Notes

Funding information

This research was supported by the Singapore Centre for 3D printing (SC3DP), the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Medium-Sized Centre funding scheme.

References

  1. 1.
    Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 83Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kodama H (1981) . Rev Sci Instrum 52(11):1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) . Adv Manuf 3(1):42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khorasani A, Gibson I, Goldberg M, Littlefair G (2017) . Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):295.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2016-0022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sing SL, Yeong WY, Wiria FE, Tay BY, Zhao Z, Zhao L, Tian Z, Yang S (2017) . Rapid Prototyp J 23(3):611.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2015-0178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Bang Pham C, Fai Leong K, Chiun Lim T, Sin Chian K (2008) . Rapid Prototyp J 14(4):246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atyam DM, Nguyen NH (2015) In: 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, p 4051Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koelbl MB (2015) Technology development and trends: liquid rocket propulsion. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference (AIAA Propulsion and Energy), Orlando, FL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M15-4789
  10. 10.
    Ghidini T (2013) An overview of current AM activities at the European Space Agency. http://www.3d-printing-additive-manufacturing.com/media/downloads/52-d1-12-20-c-tommaso-ghidini-esa.pdf. Presented at the 3D printing & additive manufacturing - Industrial Applications Global Summit 2013. London, UK
  11. 11.
    Misra AK, Grady JE, Carter R (2015) Additive manufacturing of aerospace propulsion components. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at Additive Manufacturing for Small Manufacturers, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: GRC-E-DAA-TN27123
  12. 12.
    Marshall WM, Zemba M, Shemelya C, Wicker R, Espalin D, MacDonald E, Keif C, Kwas A (2015) AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference (NASA)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halbig MC, Singh M (2015) Additive manufacturing of SiC-based ceramics and ceramic matrix composites. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 11th International Conference on Ceramic Materials and Components for Energy and Environmental Applications in Vancouver, BC, Canada. NASA Report/Patent Number: GRC-E-DAA-TN24157
  14. 14.
    Frazier WE (2014) . J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ball VK, Roberson LB, O’Connor GW, Trigwell S, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) . Rapid Prototyp J 18(6):451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Council NR (2014) 3D printing in space. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/18871/3d-printing-in-space  https://doi.org/10.17226/18871 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merrill GP (1897) A treatise on rocks rock-weathering and soils. Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.66971
  18. 18.
    Pan Z, Ding D, Wu B, Cuiuri D, Li H, Norrish J (2018). In: Chen S, Zhang Y, Feng Z (eds) Transactions on intelligent welding manufacturing. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D, Salonitis K (2017) . Proc Instit Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 231(1):96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414567522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costabile G, Fera M, Fruggiero F, Lambiase A, Pham D (2017) . Int J Ind Eng Comput 8(2):263.  https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2016.9.001 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P, Martina F, Watts C, Drake R (2017) . CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 19:117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.07.001 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755581717300299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dennison JR (2015) An overview of the dynamic interplay between the space environment and spacecraft materials. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mp_presentations/114/. Laboratory of Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering
  25. 25.
    Werkheiser N (2014) Overview of nasa initiatives in 3D printing and additive manufacturing. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 2014 DoD Maintenance Symposium, Birmingham, AL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M15-4252
  26. 26.
    Brown DC (2011) NASA to launch new science mission to asteroid in 2016. https://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/osiris-rex.html. Accessed 2015-11-23
  27. 27.
    Skran DL (2015) Battle of the Collossi: SLS vs Falcon Heavy. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2737/1. Accessed 2016-03-16
  28. 28.
    GlobalCom Satellite Phones (2015) The cost of building and launching a satellite. https://www.globalcomsatphone.com/hughesnet/satellite/costs.html. Accessed 2016-06-15
  29. 29.
    Imken TK, Stevenson TH, Lightsey EG (2015) . J Small Satellites 4(2):371Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Molitch-Hou M (2016) 3D printing has its place in Martian settlements, according to NASA. https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3d-printing-in-martian-settlements-nasa-66718/. Accessed 2017-09-01
  31. 31.
    Wong JY, Pfahnl AC (2014) . Aviat Space Environ Med 85(7):758.  https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.3898.2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Werkheiser N (2017) NASA additive manufacturing overview. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20170001551.pdf. Presented at military additive manufacturing summit 2017, Tampa, FL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN38811
  33. 33.
    Made In Space (2018) 3D printing in zero gravity experiment. http://madeinspace.us/projects/3dp/. Accessed 2016-05-10
  34. 34.
    Thomas D, Snyder MP, Napoli M, Joyce ER, Shestople P, Letcher T (2017) In: AIAA SPACE and astronautics forum and exposition, p 5278Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Werkheiser N (2015) In-space manufacturing: pioneering a sustainable path to Mars. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center; Huntsville, AL, United States. NASA Report/Patent Number: M15-4866
  36. 36.
    Snyder M, Dunn J, Gonzalez E (2013) In: AIAA SPACE 2013 conference and exposition, p 5439Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bean QA, Cooper KG, Edmunson JE, Johnston MM, Werkheiser MJ (2015) International Space Station (ISS) 3D printer performance and material characterization methodology. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 62nd JANNAF Propulsion Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M15-4563Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prater TJ, Bean QA, Beshears RD, Rolin TD, Werkheiser NJ, Ordonez E, Ryan RM, Ledbetter IIIFE (2016) Summary report on phase I results from the 3D printing in zero g technology demonstration mission, volume i. Tech. rep., NASA Marshall Space Flight CenterGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clinton RG, Morgan K (2015) Additive manufacturing at NASA marshall space flight center: In-space and for-space initiatives. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the additive manufacturing for defense and government symposium in Huntsville, AL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M16-5001
  40. 40.
    ASTM International (2014) ASTM D638-14 standard test method for tensile properties of plasticsGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    ASTM International (2015) ASTM D790 - 15e2 standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materialsGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    ASTM International (2015) ASTM D695 - 15 standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plasticsGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Made In Space (2018) Additive manufacturing facility. http://madeinspace.us/projects/amf. Accessed 2018-05-31
  44. 44.
    ASTM International (2014) ASTM D638 - 14 standard test methods for tensile properties of plasticsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rainey K (2016) Building the future: space station crew 3-d prints first student-designed tool in space. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/multipurpose_precision_maintenance_tool. Accessed 2016-08-01
  46. 46.
    McGuire T, Hirsch M, Parsons M, Leake S, Straub J (2016) In: Sensors and systems for space applications IX, vol 9838. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 98380VGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Boyle A (2018) Tethers unlimited delivers 3-D printer and recycler combo to NASA for space station. https://www.geekwire.com. Accessed 2018-10-21
  48. 48.
    SBIR, NASA (2014) Positrusion filament recycling system for ISS. https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/888089. Accessed 2017-08-17
  49. 49.
    T.U. Inc. (2015) Positrusion filament Recycler, superior quality filament for 3D printers. Brochure. http://www.tethers.com/SpecSheets/Brochure_Positrusion_20150127.pdf
  50. 50.
    Boyle A (2017) Tethers unlimited wins NASA grant to work on future FabLab for 3-D printing in space. www.geekwire.com
  51. 51.
    Hoyt RP, Cushing JI, Slostad JT, Jimmerson G, Moser T, Kirkos G, Jaster ML, Voronka NR (2013) In: AIAA Space 2013 conference and exposition, p 5509Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tethers Unlimited (2014) Spiderfab. http://www.tethers.com/SpiderFab.html. Accessed 2018-03-06
  53. 53.
    Patane S, Joyce ER, Snyder MP, Shestople P (2017) In: AIAA SPACE and astronautics forum and exposition, p 5227Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Clinton RG (2018) Additive manufacturing for human space exploration. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp. Presented at the Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace and Space conference, Munich, Germany. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN52182
  55. 55.
    Kruth J, Leu M, Nakagawa T (1998) . {CIRP} Ann - Manuf Technol 47(2):525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5. http://www.sciencedirect.com CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Konecny G (2004) In: XXth ISPRS Congress, commission, vol 4, pp 12–23Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    SaRC (2016) Satellite Research Centre (SaRC) factsheet. http://www.sarc.eee.ntu.edu.sg/Research/Projects/Documents/SaRC
  58. 58.
    Mahoney E (2016) First cubesat built by an elementary school deployed into space. https://www.nasa.gov/. Accessed 2016-12-03
  59. 59.
    amsat-uk (2013) Ossi-1 amateur radio cubesat launched. https://amsat-uk.org/2013/04/19/ossi-1-amateur-radio-cubesat-launched/. Accessed 2018-02-26
  60. 60.
    Tylka J (2016) Evaluation of additively manufactured metals for use on oxygen systems. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at Additive Manufacturing for Propulsion Applications, Huntsville, AL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: JSC-CN-37294
  61. 61.
    Clinton RG (2017) Overview of additive manufacturing initiatives at NASA marshall space flight center - in space and rocket engines. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/. Presented at the Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace, Defence & Space Conference, London, UK. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN38745
  62. 62.
    Carter R, Draper S, Locci I, Lerch B, Ellis D, Senick P, Meyer M, Free J, Cooper K, Jones Z (2015) 66th International Astronautical CongressGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hinojos A, Mireles J, Reichardt A, Frigola P, Hosemann P, Murr LE, Wicker RB (2016) . Mater Des 94:17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.041 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127516300405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carter RW (2015) GRC metal additive manufacturing. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented in Cleveland, OH, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: GRC-E-DAA-TN25102
  65. 65.
    Susan D, Brad L, Richard R, Richard M, Ivan L, Anita G (2016) Materials characterization of electron beam melted Ti − 6Al − 4V. Wiley-Blackwell, chap 242, pp 1433–1440.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119296126.ch242 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119296126.ch242 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ellis DL (2005) Grcop-84: a high-temperature copper alloy for high-heat-flux applications. Tech. rep., NASA Glenn Research Center. NASA Report/Patent Number: NASA/TM-2005-213566, E-15011Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Greitemeier D, Palm F, Syassen F, Melz T (2017) . Int J Fatigue 94:211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.001 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112316300871. Fatigue and Fracture Behavior of Additive Manufactured PartsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Minneci R, Rawn C, Bunn J, Floyd J, Jones Z (2017) Preliminary residual stress mapping of GRCop-84 fabricated by SLM. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 2017 Joint Nanoscience and Neutron Scattering User Meeting, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M17-6172
  69. 69.
    Vickers J (2015) Low cost upper stage-class propulsion (lcusp). techreport, NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov
  70. 70.
    Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) . Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81 (1):465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sudbrack CK, Kirka MM, Dehoff RR, Carter RW, Semiatin SL, Gabb TP (2016) NASA/ORNL/AFRL project work on EBM LSHR: additive manufacturing of high-temperature gamma-prime strengthened ni-based superalloys. Tech. rep., NASA Glenn Research Center.  https://doi.org/10.2172/1362246, https://ntrs.nasa.gov
  72. 72.
    Gradl P, Brandsmeier W, Calvert M, Greene S, O’Neal D, Protz C, Richard J, Morgan K (2017) Additive manufacturing overview: propulsion applications, design for and lessons learned.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4860. NASA Report/Patent Number: M17-6434
  73. 73.
    Mosher D (2018) Defectors from SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Tesla are developing a remarkable technology called ’Stargate’ to help colonize other planets. https://www.businessinsider.sg/relativity-space-3d-printed-rockets-mars-2018-10/?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 2018-11-25
  74. 74.
    Relativity Space (2018) Terran 1. https://www.relativityspace.com/terran/. Accessed 2018-11-25
  75. 75.
    Masugana S (2018) Entrepreneur seeks to boldly go where no one has gone before: 3-D printing nearly an entire rocket. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-rocket-tim-ellis-relativity-20180427-story.html Accessed 2018-11-25
  76. 76.
    George SM (2009) . Chem Rev 110(1):111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mireles O, Garcia C, Jones Z (2016) Potential for additive manufacture in nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP). https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at nuclear and emerging technologies for space, Huntsville, AL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M16-5074
  78. 78.
    Finseth JL (1991) Rover nuclear rocket engine program: overview of rover engine tests. Final Report. Tech. rep., Sverdrup Technology, Inc., HuntsvilleGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Community Research and development information service (CORDIS) (2018) Amaze report summary. https://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/223006_en.html
  80. 80.
    Adkins N, Lavery N, Cabannes K, Montredon F, Schmidtke K (2017) APOD 15 – invar space parts. http://amazeproject.eu/publications/. Presented at the AMAZE Project Technology Forum, Coventry, UK
  81. 81.
    Montredon F (2017) Sun sensor and antenna support. http://amazeproject.eu/publications/. Presented at the AMAZE Project Technology Forum, Coventry, UK
  82. 82.
    SpaceX (2014) Spacex launches 3D-printed part to space, creates printed engine chamber. https://www.spacex.com/. Accessed 2016-02-02
  83. 83.
    Airbus Defence and Space (2015) Airbus defence and space optimising components using 3D printing for new Eurostar E3000 satellite platforms. www.airbusdefenceandspace.com
  84. 84.
    EOS (2015) Airbus defence and space - additive manufacturing process by EOS optimizes satellite technology. www.eos.info
  85. 85.
    Lin A (2018) Engines - SEDS UCS. https://www.sedsucsd.org/projects/engines/. Accessed 2017-09-23
  86. 86.
    Catina JJ, Castonguay K (2015) Use of additive manufacturing to model and develop advanced liquid propulsion designs. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Propulsion and Energy Forum.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-406810.2514/6.2015-4068
  87. 87.
    Kuentz L, Salem A, Singh M, Halbig MC, Salem JA (2016) Additive manufacturing and characterization of polylactic acid (PLA) composites containing metal reinforcements. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the 40th International Conference and Expo on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, Daytona Beach, FL. USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: GRC-E-DAA-TN29146
  88. 88.
    Gagne KR, Hitt DL, McDevitt MR (2016) In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, p 0963Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mehrparvar A, Pignatelli D, Carnahan J, Munakat R, Lan W, Toorian A, Hutputanasin A, Lee S (2014) The CubeSat Program, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo USGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Utah State University. Design and Characterization of a 3D-Printed Attitude Control Thruster for an Interplanetary 6U CubeSat. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2016/TS5Propulsion/3/
  91. 91.
    Wyman C (2015) Stratasys 3D printing keeps nasa satellite on time and on budget – FDM strong enough for space. http://blog.stratasys.com/2015/02/12/nasa-3d-printing-fortus/. Accessed 2015-12-12
  92. 92.
    Slejko EA, Longato E, Seriani S, Gallina P, Lughi V, Bozzolan F, Cuttin A, Fragiacomo M, Gregorio A (2018) The 4S SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Mueller RP, Townsend II, Tamasy GJ, Evers CJ, Sibille LJ, Edmunson JE, Fiske MR, Fikes JC, Case M (2018) Additive construction with mobile emplacement (ACME)/automated construction of expeditionary structures (ACES) materials delivery system (MDS). https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the ASCE Earth and Space Conference 2018, Cleveland, OH, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: KSC-E-DAA-TN48594
  94. 94.
    Fiske M, Edmunson J (2017) Additive construction with mobile emplacement (ACME) 3D printing structures with in-situ resources. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, AL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN48929
  95. 95.
    Edmunson J, Fiske M, Mueller R, Alkhateb H, Alhnoukh A, Morris H, Townsend V, Fikes J, Johnston M (2018) Additive construction with mobile emplacement: multifaceted planetary construction materials development. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Earth and Space 2018 Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN54927
  96. 96.
    Werkheiser MJ, Fiske M, Edmunson J, Khoshnevis B (2015) In: AIAA SPACE 2015 conference and exposition, p 4451Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Khoshnevis B, Hwang D, Yao KT, Yeh Z (2006) . Int J Ind Syst Eng 1(3):301Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ordonez E, Edmunson J, Fiske M, Christiansen E, Miller J, Davis BA, Read J, Johnston M, Fikes J (2017) . Procedia Eng 204:390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Meurisse A, Sperl M, Makaya A (2005) . Mater Sci Eng: A 533:413–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Cesaretti G, Dini E, Kestelier XD, Colla V, Pambaguian L (2014) . Acta Astronautica 93:430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576513002889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Colla V, Dini E (2013) Low-cost 3D printing, for science, education & sustainable development, 127–132Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Goulas A, Binner JG, Engstrøm DS, Harris RA, Friel RJ (2018) . Proc Instit Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl 0(0):1464420718777932 (0).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718777932 Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Jakus AE, Koube KD, Geisendorfer NR, Shah RN (2017) . Sci Rep 7:44931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lietaert K, Thijs L, Neirinck B, Lapauw T, Morrison B, Lewicki C, Vaerenbergh JV (2018) . Acta Astronautica 143:76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.11.027. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576517310196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Kief C (2015) 3D printing the complete cubesat. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. NASA Report/Patent Number: NASA FS-2015-03-32-ARC
  106. 106.
    Ahn D, Kweon JH, Choi J, Lee S (2012) . J Mater Process Technol 212(2):339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Mostafaei A, Stevens EL, Hughes ET, Biery SD, Hilla C, Chmielus M (2016) . Mater Des 108:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    A fully non-metallic gas turbine engine enabled by additive manufacturing. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 22nd International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE 2015), Phoenix, AZ, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: ISABE-2015-20168, GRC-E-DAA-TN24606
  109. 109.
    Rehme O, Emmelmann C (2006) Rapid manufacturing of lattice structures with selective laser melting.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.645848
  110. 110.
    Scott J, Gupta N, Wember C, Newsom S, Wohlers T, Caffrey T (2012) Additive manufacturing: status and opportunities. Science and Technology Policy InstituteGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Frazier WE, Polakovics D, Koegel W (2001) . JOM (The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society) 53(3):16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0171-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Rice RC (2003) Metallic materials properties development and standardization (MMPDS): Chapters 1–4, vol 1 (National Technical Information Service)Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Pattnaik S, Jha PK, Karunakar DB (2014) . Proc Instit Mech Eng Part L: J Mater Des Appl 228 (4):249Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Stephenson T, Swanson T (2014) Additive manufacturing: ensuring quality for spacecraft applications. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 2nd Annual Additive Manufacturing in Government Conference, Washington D.C., USA. Report/Patent Number: GSFC-E-DAA-TN19182
  115. 115.
    Wells D (2017) Standardization in additive manufacturing: challenges in structural integrity assurance. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at the Additive Manufacturing For Reactor Materials and Components Public Meeting, Bethesda, MD, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: M17-6393
  116. 116.
    ASTM International (2013) ASTM52921-13 standard terminology for additive manufacturing-coordinate systems and test methodologiesGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    ASTM International (2015) ASTM 52900:2015(E) standard terminology for additive manufacturing – general principles – terminology.  https://doi.org/10.1520/F3177-15
  118. 118.
    ASTM International (2014) ASTM F3122-14 standard guide for evaluating mechanical properties of metal materials made via additive manufacturing processes.  https://doi.org/10.1520/F3122-14
  119. 119.
    ASTM International (2013) ASTM F2971-13 standard practice for reporting data for test specimens prepared by additive manufacturing.  https://doi.org/10.1520/F2971
  120. 120.
    ASTM International (2014) ASTM F3091/F3091M-14, standard specification for powder bed fusion of plastic materials.  https://doi.org/10.1520/F3091_F3091M-14
  121. 121.
    Seifi M, Gorelik M, Waller J, Hrabe N, Shamsaei N, Daniewicz S, Lewandowski JJ (2017) . Jom 69(3):439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    ASTM International (2016) ASTM A370-16 standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products.  https://doi.org/10.1520/A0370-16
  123. 123.
    ASTM International (2015) ASTM B565-04(2015) standard test method for shear testing of aluminum and aluminum-alloy rivets and cold-heading wire and rods.  https://doi.org/10.1520/B0565-04R15
  124. 124.
    ASTM International (2010) ASTM E132-04(2010) standard test method for Poisson’s ratio at room temperatureGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    ASTM International (2014) ASTM E290-14 standard test methods for bend testing of material for ductilityGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Aguilar D, Christensen S, Fox EJ (2015) 3-D printed Ultem 9085 testing and analysis. Technical report, SPHERES National LabGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Forster AM (2015) Materials testing standards for additive manufacturing of polymer materials: state of the art and standards applicability.  https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8059
  128. 128.
    Chuang KC, Grady JE, Draper RD, Shin ESE, Patterson C, Santelle TD (2015) The composites and advanced materials expo (CAMX). DallasGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
  130. 130.
    Wells D, Clinton R (2015) Overview of flight certification methodology for additive manufacturing. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at Frontiers in Additive Manufacturing Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN24486
  131. 131.
    Morgan K (2016) A proposed qualification methodology for additively manufactured spaceflight propulsion hardware. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at 23rd Additive Manufacturing Technology and CQSDI, Cape Canaveral, FL, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN30330
  132. 132.
    Marshall Space Flight Center (2017) MSFC-STD-3716 - standard for additively manufactured spaceflight hardware by laser powder bed fusion in metals. Standard, NASA. https://standards.nasa.gov
  133. 133.
    Marshall Space Flight Center (2017) MSFC-SPEC-3717 - specification for control and qualification of laser powder bed fusion metallurgical processes. Standard, NASA. https://standards.nasa.gov
  134. 134.
    Morgan K (2017) Additive manufacturing overview: propulsion applications, design for and lessons learned. https://ntrs.nasa.gov. Presented at AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum 2017, Atlanta, GA, USA. NASA Report/Patent Number: MSFC-E-DAA-TN44554
  135. 135.
    Williams SW, Martina F, Addison AC, Ding J, Pardal G, Colegrove P (2015) Materials Science and Technology, p 1743284715Y.000.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Bandari YK, Williams SW, Ding J, Martina F (2015) In: 26th International solid freeform fabrication symposium, vol 1. Austin, pp 17–25Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Bandari YK, Lee YS, Nandwana P, Richardson BS, Adediran AI, Love LJ (2018) In: Solid freeform fabrication 2018 - proceedings of the 29th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium – an additive manufacturing conference, vol 1. University of Texas in Austin, pp 425– 437Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Schelmetic T (2017) Laser metal deposition with wire process used for additive manufacturing of large titanium components. https://www.designnews.com. Accessed 2019-02-08
  139. 139.
    Thryft AR (2016) Who’s got the biggest 3D-printed part? https://www.designnews.com. Accessed 2019-04-05
  140. 140.
  141. 141.
    Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2016) . Nat Biotechnol 34:312 EP.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
  143. 143.
    Thomas D (2016) . Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5):1857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7973-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Baumers M, Holweg M, Rowley J (2016) 3D printing–redistributing manufacturing project report. Available at https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research-projects/3DP-RDM_report.pdf. Accessed 2019-02-11
  145. 145.
    Cotteleer M (2014) 3D opportunity: additive manufacturing paths to performance, innovation, and growth. http://www.cellular3d.com/images/marketresearch/SIMT_AM_Conference_Keynote-Oct2014.pdf. Presented at 2014 SIMT additive manufacturing symposium
  146. 146.
    Martin JH, Yahata BD, Hundley JM, Mayer JA, Schaedler TA, Pollock TM (2017) . Nature 549:365 EP.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Campbell T, Williams C, Ivanova O, Garrett B (2011) Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing. Atlantic Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations