Advertisement

Influence of laser processing parameters on porosity in Inconel 718 during additive manufacturing

  • Pankaj KumarEmail author
  • Jano Farah
  • Javed AkramEmail author
  • Chong Teng
  • Jon Ginn
  • Mano Misra
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The melt pool characteristics in terms of size and shape and the porosity development in laser powder bed fusion–processed Inconel 718 were investigated to determine how laser power and scan speed influence the porosity in the microstructure. The melt pool characteristics developed with both single-track and multilayer bulk laser deposition were evaluated. It was found that the melt pool characteristic is critical for the porosity development. It is shown that the porosity fraction and pore shape change depending on the melt pool size and shape. This result is explained based on the local energy density of a laser during the process. High-density (> 99%) Inconel 718 samples were achieved over a wide range of laser energy densities (J/mm2). A careful assessment shows that the laser power and scan speed affect differently in developing the pores in the samples. The porosity decreased rapidly with the increase in laser power while it varied linearly with the scan speed. A proper combination, however, led to fully dense samples. The study reveals an optimum condition in terms of laser power and scan speed that can be adopted to fabricate high-density Inconel 718 parts using laser powder bed fusion–based additive manufacturing process.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Selective laser melting Inconel 718 Porosity Melt pool characteristics Laser powder bed fusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The authors PK, JF, and MM duly acknowledge the partial financial support from the Roger and Dawn Center for Renewable Energy Center at the University of Utah.

References

  1. 1.
    Arısoy YM, Criales LE, Özel T et al (2017) Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1393–1417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9429-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B et al (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:22–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang X, Gong X, Chou K (2017) Review on powder-bed laser additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231:1890–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405415619883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kempen K, Thijs L, Yasa E, et al (2011) Process optimization and microstructural analysis for selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg. pp 484–495Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamath C, El-dasher B, Gallegos GF et al (2014) Density of additively-manufactured, 316L SS parts using laser powder-bed fusion at powers up to 400 W. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jia Q, Gu D (2014) Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd 585:713–721.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song B, Dong S, Liao H, Coddet C (2012) Process parameter selection for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V based on temperature distribution simulation and experimental sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun J, Yang Y, Wang D (2013) Parametric optimization of selective laser melting for forming Ti6Al4V samples by Taguchi method. Opt Laser Technol 49:118–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dilip JJS, Zhang S, Teng C et al (2017) Influence of processing parameters on the evolution of melt pool, porosity, and microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 2:157–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0030-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maamoun AH, Xue YF, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC (2018) Effect of SLM process parameters on the quality of Al alloy parts; part II: microstructure and mechanical properties.  https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201811.0026.v1
  11. 11.
    Riedlbauer D, Scharowsky T, Singer RF et al (2017) Macroscopic simulation and experimental measurement of melt pool characteristics in selective electron beam melting of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:1309–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8819-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fotovvati B, Wayne SF, Lewis G, Asadi E (2018) A review on melt-pool characteristics in laser welding of metals. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4920718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gu H, Gong H, Pal D, et al (2013) Influences of energy density on porosity and microstructure of selective laser melted 17-4PH stainless steelGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sames WJ, List F, Pannala S et al (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61:315–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi J-P, Shin G-H, Yang S et al (2017) Densification and microstructural investigation of Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Powder Technol 310:60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paria Karimi Neghlani (2016) SLM additive manufacturing of alloy 718 effect of process parameters on microstructure and properties. PhD thesis, University WestGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mertens R, Clijsters S, Kempen K, Kruth J-P (2014) Optimization of scan strategies in selective laser melting of aluminum parts with downfacing areas. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:061012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teng C, Ashby K, Phan N et al (2016) The effects of material property assumptions on predicted meltpool shape for laser powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing. Meas Sci Technol 27:085602.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/8/085602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kasperovich G, Hausmann J (2015) Improvement of fatigue resistance and ductility of TiAl6V4 processed by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol 220:202–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    AlMangour B, Grzesiak D, Borkar T, Yang J-M (2018) Densification behavior, microstructural evolution, and mechanical properties of TiC/316L stainless steel nanocomposites fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des 138:119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jia Q, Gu D (2014) Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: high-temperature oxidation property and its mechanisms. Opt Laser Technol 62:161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cherry JA, Davies HM, Mehmood S et al (2015) Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:869–879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6297-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang J, Han J, Yu H et al (2016) Role of molten pool mode on formability, microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Des 110:558–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kamath C (2016) Data mining and statistical inference in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:1659–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fotovvati B, Namdari N, Dehghanghadikolaei A (2018) Fatigue performance of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V components: state of the art. Materials Research Express 6:012002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aae10e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hack H, Link R, Knudsen E et al (2017) Mechanical properties of additive manufactured nickel alloy 625. Additive Manufacturing 14:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zadi-Maad A, Basuki A (2018) The development of additive manufacturing technique for nickel-base alloys: a review. AIP Publishing, New York, p 020064Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components—process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B et al (2017) Predictive modeling and optimization of multi-track processing for laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625. Addit. Manuf 13:14–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Manfredi D, Calignano F (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of aluminum, titanium and nickel based alloys: materials and design investigations. IEEE:1423–1425Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gong H, Teng C, Zeng K, et al (2016) Single track of selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V powder on support structureGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dilip J, Anam MA, Pal D, Stucker B (2016) A short study on the fabrication of single track deposits in SLM and characterizationGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brooks J, Bridges P (1988) Metallurgical stability of Inconel alloy 718. Superalloys 88:33–42Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eiselstein H, Tillack D (1991) The invention and definition of alloy 625. Superalloys 718:1–14Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sharman ARC, Amarasinghe A, Ridgway K (2008) Tool life and surface integrity aspects when drilling and hole making in Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 200:424–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parida AK, Maity K (2018) Comparison the machinability of Inconel 718, Inconel 625 and Monel 400 in hot turning operation. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 21:364–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Narutaki N, Yamane Y, Hayashi K et al (1993) High-speed machining of Inconel 718 with ceramic tools. CIRP Ann 42:103–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62402-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Blackwell PL (2005) The mechanical and microstructural characteristics of laser-deposited IN718. J Mater Process Technol 170:240–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amato KN, Gaytan SM, Murr LE et al (2012) Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Mater 60:2229–2239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pröbstle M, Neumeier S, Hopfenmüller J et al (2016) Superior creep strength of a nickel-based superalloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 674:299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bean GE, Witkin DB, McLouth TD, Zaldivar RJ (2018) The effect of laser focus and process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of SLM Inconel 718. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 105230YGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moussaoui K, Rubio W, Mousseigne M et al (2018) Effects of selective laser melting additive manufacturing parameters of Inconel 718 on porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 735:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seifi M, Salem A, Beuth J et al (2016) Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing. Jom 68:747–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H et al (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit. Manuf 1:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gorsse S, Hutchinson C, Gouné M, Banerjee R (2017) Additive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti-6Al-4V and high-entropy alloys. Sci Technol Adv Mater 18:584–610.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2017.1361305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xia M, Gu D, Yu G et al (2017) Porosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 116:96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sadowski M, Ladani L, Brindley W, Romano J (2016) Optimizing quality of additively manufactured Inconel 718 using powder bed laser melting process. Addit. Manuf 11:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Laoui T, Froyen L, Yadroitsev IA et al (2004) Balling processes during selective laser treatment of powders. Rapid Prototyp J 10:78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540410526953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mumtaz KA, Hopkinson N (2010) Selective laser melting of thin wall parts using pulse shaping. J Mater Process Technol 210:279–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kasperovich G, Haubrich J, Gussone J, Requena G (2016) Correlation between porosity and processing parameters in TiAl6V4 produced by selective laser melting. Mater Des 105:160–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Karthik NV, et al (2013) The effects of processing parameters on defect regularity in Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. pp 440–453Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thijs L, Verhaeghe F, Craeghs T et al (2010) A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Mater 58:3303–3312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dai D, Gu D (2014) Thermal behavior and densification mechanism during selective laser melting of copper matrix composites: simulation and experiments. Mater Des 55:482–491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pang S, Chen W, Wang W (2014) A quantitative model of keyhole instability induced porosity in laser welding of titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 45:2808–2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vilaro T, Colin C, Bartout JD (2011) As-fabricated and heat-treated microstructures of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans A 42:3190–3199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0731-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tan JL, Tang C, Wong CH (2018) A computational study on porosity evolution in parts produced by selective laser melting. Metall and Mat Trans A 49:3663–3673  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4697-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Akram J, Chalavadi P, Pal D, Stucker B (2018) Understanding grain evolution in additive manufacturing through modeling. Addit. Manuf 21:255–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  2. 2.Metallurgical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.AnsysPark CityUSA

Personalised recommendations