Magnetorheological nano-finishing of tube extrusion punch for improving its functional applications in press machine

  • Anirudh Chana
  • Anant Kumar SinghEmail author


In metal forming processes, surface roughness plays a vital role in deciding the efficiency of the process. A rough surface results in more power loss and abrasion in dies and punches during metal forming operations. In the present work, the magnetorheological fluid-based finishing process is used to finish the industrial tube extrusion punch made of hardened H13 die steel material. A magnetorheological solid core rotating tool has been used in the process. Process parameters for AISI H13 steel have been optimized using response surface methodology. For the study of process parameters optimization, specimens in the form of pieces are prepared. These specimens maintain the same surface roughness and hardness as that of the industrial extrusion punch. The effect of various process parameters on the percentage change in average surface roughness of H13 die steel is analyzed and has optimized the parameters for better process performance. Experiments are performed using optimum parameters to examine the process performance with respect to time on the H13 die steel specimen. Change in surface morphology is also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The optimized parameters are then used to finish the industrial tube extrusion punch on the designed fixture. By using the optimized parameters, the surface finish of the industrial extrusion punch is reduced to 70 nm from 480 nm in 23 h. After magnetorheological finishing on the extrusion punch, the punch is taken in the industry to check the effect of reduction in surface roughness during the extrusion process. It is found that power consumption has been reduced by 25%. There is also an improvement in extrusion punch life. The magnetorheological finished extrusion punch now extruded more almost 3515–3520 tube spindles as compared to 3300–3500 with ground extrusion punch.


Extrusion punch Magnetorheological polishing fluid H13 die steel Surface roughness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. 1.
    Altan SB (1994) A deformation model for tube extrusion. J Mater Process Technol 40:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson WRD (1979) Friction and lubrication in bulk metal forming processes. Journal of Applied Metal Working 1:1–7Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebrahimi R, Reihanian M, Kanuavi M, Moshksar MM (2008) An upper bound analysis of tube extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 199:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moshksar MM, Ebrahimi R (1998) An analytical approach for backward extrusion forging of rectangular polygonal hollow components. Int J Mech Sci 400:1247–1263CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chander S, Chawla V (2017) Failure of hot forging dies - an updated perspective. Mater Today 4:1147–1157Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Starling CMD, TB JR (1997) Thermal fatigue of hot work tool steel with hard coatings. Thin Solid Films 308:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gattmah J, Ozturk F, Orhan S (2017) Effect of process parameters on hot extrusion of hollow tube. Arab J Sci Eng.
  8. 8.
    Orunganti RK, Subramanian PR, Marte JS, Gigliotti MF, Amancherla S (2005) Effect of friction, back pressure and strain rate senstivity on material flow during equal channel angular extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A 406:102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arif AFM, Sheikh AK, Qamar SZ, Raza MK, Al-Fuhaid KMC (2002) Product defects in aluminum extrusion and its impact on operational cost. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.
  10. 10.
    Jain VK (2008) Abrasive based nano finishing techniques : an overview. Mach Sci Technol An Int J 12(3):257–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain VK (2009) Magnetic field assisted abrasive based micro/nano finishing. J Mater Process Technol 209:6022–6038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhoades LJ (1988) Abrasive flow machining. Manuf Eng 1:75–78Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheulke T, Grotjohn TA (2012) Diamond polishing. Diam Relat Mater 32:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Komanduri R, Lucca D, Tani Y (1997) Technological advances in fine abrasive processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46(2):545–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sankar MR, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2016) Nano-finishing of cylindrical hard steel tubes using rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(9):2179–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shinmura T, Takazawa K, Hatano E, Aizawa T (1985) Study on magnetic abrasive process-process principle and finishing possibility. Bull Jpn Soc Precis Eng 19(1):54–55Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harris DC (2011) History of magnetorheological finishing. Proc Wind Dome Technol Mater SPIE.
  18. 18.
    Jha S, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1019–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh AK, Jha S, Pandey P (2012) Magnetorheological ball end finishing process. Mater Manuf Process 27(4):389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar (2012) Nanofinishing of flat workpiece using rotational-magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:405–420.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maan S, Singh AK (2018) Nano surface finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel using magnetorheological solid core rotating tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:513–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2011) Magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:405–420Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2011) Ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel using unbounded SiC abrasives. Int J Ref Metals Har Mater 29(1):68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maan S, Singh G, Singh AK (2017) Nano surface finishing of permanent mold punch using magnetorheological fluid based finishing processes. Mater Manuf Process 32(9):1004–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Zhang Y, Feng Z (2016) Analyzing and improving surface texture by dual rotation magnetorheological finishing. Appl Surf Sci 360:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang GW, Wang BH, Hsu RT (2002) Study on cylindrical magnetic abrasive finishing using unbounded magnetic abrasives. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Judal KB, Yadava V, Pathak D (2013) Experimental investigation of vibration assisted cylindrical magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum workpiece. Mater Manuf Process 28(11):1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sadiq A, Shunmugam MS (2009) Investigation into magnetorheological abrasive honing (MAH). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marashi J, Yakushina E, Xirouchakis P, Zante R, Foster J (2017) An evaluation of H13 tool steel deformation in hot forging conditions. J Mater Process Technol.
  30. 30.
    Yan H, Hua J, Shivpuri R (2007) Flow stress of AISI H13 die steel in hard machining. Mater Des 28:272–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh M, Singh A, Singh AK (2018) A rotating core based magnetorheological nano-finishing process for external cylindrical surface. Mater Manuf Process 33:1160–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sidpara A, Das M, Jain VK (2009) Rheological characterization of magnetorheological finishing fluid. Mater Manuf Process 24(12):1467–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim H, Altan T (2014) Effects of surface finish and die temperature on friction and lubrication in forging. Procedia Engineering 81:1848–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Menezes PL, Kishore, Satish VK (2008) Influence of roughness parameters on coefficient of friction under lubricated condition. Sadhana 33:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sawhney AK (2016) Electrical Machine Design. Dhanpat Rai and Co., New Delhi, pp 10.44–10.45Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations