Advertisement

Path calculation of 7-axes synchronous quasi-tangential laser manufacturing

  • Norbert AckerlEmail author
  • Maximilian Warhanek
  • Johannes Gysel
  • Konrad Wegener
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Quasi-tangential laser processing, also called laser turning, is increasingly applied for various applications. Specifically, its ability to generate complex geometries with small feature sizes at high precision and surface quality in hard, brittle, and electrically non-conductive materials is a key benefit. Due to the geometric flexibility, the process is well suited for prototyping in hard-to-machine materials such as ceramics, carbides, and super-abrasives. However, the lack of advanced software solutions for this novel process hitherto limited the exploitation of the potential. Here, we discuss a unique computer-aided manufacturing approach for synchronous 7-axes laser manufacturing with quasi-tangential strategies. This gives the peerless possibility to process arbitrary geometries, which cannot be manufactured with conventional techniques. A detailed description of the path calculation with derivation and procedures is given. The generated machine code is tested on a laser manufacturing setup consisting of five mechanical and two optical axes. Following, a processed cylindrical ceramic specimen with a continuously varying profile along a helical path is presented. The profile is constituted by a rectangular over half-spherical to a triangular groove with defined pitch on the helix. This demonstrator provides the validation of the presented CAM solution. Measurements of the produced specimen show high adherence with the target geometry and an average deviation below 10 μm.

Keywords

Laser turning Computer aided manufacturing Micro-machining Tangential processing Synchronized motion Path generation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Josquin Pfaff for steady help and discussion during the conception of the CAM toolbox. The opportunity to use the laser machining test bed at Dentalpoint AG is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding information

The study was supported by the Swiss National Fund (FuSSiT/169654) and the Commission of Technology and Innovation (18474.1).

References

  1. 1.
    Dubey AK, Yadava V (2008) Laser beam machining-a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(6):609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5-8):1191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulkarni P, Marsan A, Dutta D (2000) A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 6(1):18.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540010309859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eberle G, Dold C, Wegener K (2015) Laser fabrication of diamond micro-cutting tool-related geometries using a high-numerical aperture micro-scanning system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5-8):1117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7240-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert D, Stoesslein M, Axinte D, Kell J, Mater J (2014) A time based method for predicting the workpiece surface micro-topography under pulsed laser ablation. Process Tech 214:3077.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen G, Deng H, Zhou X, Zhou C, He J, Cai S (2015) Online tangential laser profiling of coarse-grained bronze-bonded diamond wheels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(9-12):1477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6963-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tokarev VN, Wilson JIB, Jubber MG, John P, Milne DK (1995) Modeling of self-limiting laser-ablation of rough surfaces - application to the polishing of diamond films. Diam Relat Mater 4(3):169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-9635(94)00241-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Echlin MP, Titus MS, Straw M, Gumbsch P, Pollock TM (2017) Materials response to glancing incidence femtosecond laser ablation. Acta Mater 124:37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kononenko VV, Kononenko TV, Pimenov SM, Sinyavskii MN, Konov VI, Dausinger F (2005) Effect of the pulse duration on graphitisation of diamond during laser ablation. Quantum Electron 35(3):252.  https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2005v035n03ABEH002900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chong TC, Hong MH, Shi LP (2010) Laser precision engineering: from microfabrication to nanoprocessing. Laser Photonics Rev 4(1):123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.200810057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malinauskas M, žukauskas A, Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y, Mizeikis V, Buividas R, Juodkazis S (2016) Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry. Light Sci Appl 5(8):e16133.  https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warhanek M, Pfaff J, Martin P, Schȯnbȧchler L, Boos J, Wegener K (2016) Geometry optimization of polycrystalline diamond tools for the milling of sintered Zro2. Procedia CIRP 46:290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warhanek M, Walter C, Hirschi M, Boos J, Bucourt JF, Wegener K (2016) Comparative analysis of tangentially laser-processed fluted polycrystalline diamond drilling tools. J Manuf Process 23:157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheng X, Yang XH, Huang YM, Zheng GM, Li L (2014) Helical surface creation by wire electrical discharge machining for micro tools. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30(3):287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joneja A, Pang A, Lam D, Yuen M (2000) A CAD/ CAM system for vector-based layered manufacturing systems. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 13(5):388.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920050117883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mutapcic E, Iovenitti P, Hayes JP (2006) A prototyping and microfabrication CAD/CAM tool for the excimer laser micromachining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(11-12):1076.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0147-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pothen M, Winands K, Klocke F (2017) Compensation of scanner based inertia for laser structuring processes. J Laser Appl 29(1):012017.  https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4974906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fitzpatrick J, Leonard R (1993) The limits of programmed automation in a CAD/CAM/CNC precision engraving environment. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 6(3):201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09511929308944570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cerit E, Lazoglu I (2011) A CAM-based path generation method for rapid prototyping applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1-4):319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3176-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chee C, Kai J, Gan GK, Mei T (1997) Interface between cad and rapid prototyping systems. Part 1: a study of existing interface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol pp 566–570Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chee C, Kai J, Gan GK, Mei T (1997) Interface between CAD and rapid prototyping systems. Part 2: LMI - an improved interface, Int J Adv Manuf Technol pp 571–576.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176300
  22. 22.
    Stassen Boehlen I, Fieret J, Holmes AS, Lee KW (2003) Proc. SPIE, ed. by A Pique, K Sugioka, PR Herman, J Fieret, FG Bachmann, JJ Dubowski, W Hoving, K Washio, DB Geohegan, F Traeger, K Murakami, p 198.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.479533
  23. 23.
    Wegener K, Heeling T, Zimmermann L (2016) Multi-beam strategies for the optimization of the selective laser melting process. Solid Free Fabr 2016 Proc. 27th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., pp 1428–1438.  https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-010803938
  24. 24.
    (1988) Stereolithography interface specificationsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gysel J (2017) CAM 2.5D laser ablation v2.0.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1048514. https://zenodo.org/record/1048515
  26. 26.
    Mohan P, Pandey N, Venkata R, Dhande SG (2003) Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 9(5):274.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310502185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aichholzer O, Aurenhammer F (1996) Straight skeletons for general polygonal figures in the plane. Comput Comb Lect Notes Comput Sci 1090:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61332-3 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Felkel P, Obdrzalek S (1998) Proc. Spring Conf Comput. Graph., pp 210–218Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Held M, Palfrader P, Comput CAD (2017) Straight skeletons with additive and multiplicative weights and their application to the algorithmic generation of roofs and terrains. Aided Des 92:33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2017.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ackerl N, Warhanek M, Gysel J, Wegener K (2018) Ultrashort-pulsed laser machining of dental ceramic implants, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.007
  31. 31.
    Walter C (2014) Conditioning of hybrid bonded cbn tools with short and ultrashort pulsed lasers. Doctoral thesis, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Machine Tools and Manufacturing (IWF), ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations