Sample position inside abrasive fluidized bed to obtain morphology uniformity

  • F. Pietrobono
  • G. RubinoEmail author
  • V. Tagliaferri
  • F. Trovalusci


Abrasive fluidized bed (AFB) machining of aluminum samples was studied with a specific focus on surface roughness formation, according to the sample position inside AFB operating in a minimum fluidization regime. The experimentation was aimed at defining optimum process conditions in terms of morphology uniformity and developing a mathematical model which relates the sample position to the final roughness. Measurements performed by profilometry have shown that a uniform average roughness lower than 1 μm can be obtained, starting from 3.5 μm, when the process parameters and handling are optimized. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to support the experimental and modeling strategy. This study led to the definition of a rapid and efficient procedure for finding the optimal positioning of samples in terms of finishing and surface uniformity. The proposed procedure does not require complex systems for component movement, and it is based on the study of just two reference positions of samples. The advantage of the procedure developed and validated in this study consists in its ease of implementation and its applicability in industrial strategies, where short decision times are essential.


Fluidized bed Aluminum substrate Wood particle Roughness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. 1.
    Evans CJ, Paul E, Dornfeld D, Lucca DA, Byrne G, Tricard M, Klocke F, Dambon O, Mullany BA (2003) Material removal mechanisms in lapping and polishing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(2):611–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamaguchi H, Shinmura T (1999) Study of the surface modification resulting from an internal magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear 225(229):46–255Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts WB, Thorp SA, Prahst PS, Strazisar AJ (2012) The effect of ultrapolish on a transonic axial rotor. J Turbomach 135(1):011001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang SJ, To S, Wang SJ, Zhu W (2015) A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:76–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furukawa Y, Moronuki N (1988) Effect of material properties on ultraprecise cutting processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 37:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu T, Asplund DT, Bastawros AF, Chandra A (2016) Performance and modeling of paired polishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 109:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu T, Bastawros AF, Chandra A (2017) Experimental and modeling characterization of wear and life expectancy of electroplated CBN grinding wheels. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barletta M (2009) Progress in abrasive fluidized bed machining. J Mater Process Technol 209(20):6087–6102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barletta M, Tagliaferri V, Trovalusci F, Veniali F, Gisario A (2013) The mechanisms of material removal in the fluidized bed machining of polyvinyl chloride substrates. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 135:011003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubino G, Trovalusci F, Barletta M, Fanelli P (2018) Heat treatment of AA 6082 T6 aluminum alloy coated with thin Al2O3 layer by fluidized bed. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:2605–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barletta M, Trovalusci F, Gisario A, Venettacci S (2013) New ways to the manufacturing of pigmented multi-layer protective coatings. Surf Coat Technol 232:860–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravi Sankar M, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2010) Rotational abrasive flow finishing (R-AFF) process and its effects on finished surface topography. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(7):637–650 Cited 13 timesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen K, Shao Y, Bodenhorst R, Jadva M (2017) Modelling and simulation of material removal rates and profile accuracy control in abrasive flow machining of the IBR blade and experimental perspectives. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 139(12):121020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barletta M, Rubino G, Valentini PP (2015) Experimental investigation and modeling of fluidized bed assisted drag finishing according to the theory of localization of plastic deformation and energy absorption. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2165–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giannini O, Trovalusci F, Barletta M (2015) Fuzzy model for fluidized bed assisted drag finishing. AIP Conference ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Massarsky M, Davidson DA Turbo-abrasive machining: a new method for edgeand surface finishing. In: 2nd international conference on high performance cutting (HPC), Vancouver, BC. University of British Columbia, Canada, p 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kunii D, Levenspiel O. (1991) Fluidization and mapping of regimes, in: Fluidization Engineering, second ed., Butterworth-Heinemann Stoneham, MA, United States of America 61–94 (Chapter 3)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jain NK, Jain VK (2001) Modeling of material removal in mechanical type advanced machining processes: a state-of-art review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1573–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kopac J, Krajnik P (2006) High-performance grinding – a review. J Mater ProcessTechnol 175(1–3):278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Coba-Salcedo M (2014) Modelling of surface finish and material removal rate in rough honing. Precis Eng 38(1):100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sundararajan G (1991) A comprehensive model for the solid particle erosion of ductile materials. Wear 149:111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Pietrobono
    • 1
  • G. Rubino
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. Tagliaferri
    • 1
  • F. Trovalusci
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’ImpresaUniversità degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Università della Tuscia, DEIMViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations