Advertisement

Analytical evaluation of defect generation for selective laser melting of metals

  • Patcharapit Promoppatum
  • Shi-Chune YaoEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Defects in selective laser melting parts are among major reasons that hinder the wider adoption of a laser powder bed–based manufacturing. Experiments and numerical modeling are often proceeded to gain a better understanding of defect generation. However, these approaches demand extensive computational and experimental resources until comprehensive understanding of a process-defect relationship can be developed. To address this challenge, the present study utilized an analytical approach to illustrate the relationship between processing parameters and common defects such as lack of fusion, keyholing, and balling effects. The primary aim was to serve as a quick and efficient tool to identify processing conditions leading to undesirable outcome. The analysis began by predicting melt pool dimensions, in which these dimensions were successively used for the defect determination. Ultimately, criteria for defect initiation were combined and presented in a single processing window, where available experimental data from various materials and processes were compared throughout the study to ensure the validity of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Additive manufacturing Microstructure Ti-6Al-4V Processing window Analytical solution Porosity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge the NextManufacturing Center at Carnegie Mellon University for fabricating samples as well as Dr. Alexander M. Rubenchik, Dr. Vitoon Uthaisangsuk, and Dr. Chettapong Janya-anurak for fruitful discussion. The research was supported by Research Strengthening Project of the Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.

References

  1. 1.
    Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1917–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kundakcıoğlu E, Lazoglu I, Poyraz Ö, Yasa E, Cizicioğlu N (2018) Thermal and molten pool model in selective laser melting process of Inconel 625. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3977–3984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song B, Dong S, Liao H, Coddet C (2012) Process parameter selection for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V based on temperature distribution simulation and experimental sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauereiß A, Scharowsky T, Körner C (2014) Defect generation and propagation mechanism during additive manufacturing by selective beam melting. J Mater Process Technol 214:2522–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rausch AM, Markl M, Körner C (2018) Predictive simulation of process windows for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: influence of the powder size distribution. Comput Math ApplGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panwisawas C, Perumal B, Ward RM, Turner N, Turner RP, Brooks JW, Basoalto HC (2017) Keyhole formation and thermal fluid flow-induced porosity during laser fusion welding in titanium alloys: experimental and modelling. Acta Mater 126:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu Y-C, San C-H, Chang C-H, Lin H-J, Marwan R, Baba S, Hwang W-S (2018) Numerical modeling of melt-pool behavior in selective laser melting with random powder distribution and experimental validation. J Mater Process Technol 254:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cunningham R, Narra SP, Montgomery C, Beuth J, Rollett AD (2017) Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-bed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Jom 69:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabernero I, Lamikiz A, Martínez S, Ukar E, Figueras J (2011) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of Inconel 718 components built by laser cladding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadowski M, Ladani L, Brindley W, Romano J (2016) Optimizing quality of additively manufactured Inconel 718 using powder bed laser melting process. Additive Manufacturing 11:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casalino G, Campanelli SL, Contuzzi N, Ludovico AD (2015) Experimental investigation and statistical optimisation of the selective laser melting process of a maraging steel. Opt Laser Technol 65:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Promoppatum P, Onler R, Yao S-C (2017) Numerical and experimental investigations of micro and macro characteristics of direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V products. J Mater Process Technol 240:262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Casalino G, Campanelli SL, Contuzzi N, Ludovico AD (2015) Experimental investigation and statistical optimisation of the selective laser melting process of a maraging steel. Opt Laser Technol 65:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moussaoui K, Rubio W, Mousseigne M, Sultan T, Rezai F (2018) Effects of selective laser melting additive manufacturing parameters of Inconel 718 on porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 735:182–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Read N, Wang W, Essa K, Attallah MM (2015) Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater Des (1980-2015) 65:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uddin SZ, Espalin D, Mireles J, Morton P, Terrazas C, Collins S, Murr LE, Wicker R (2016) Laser powder bed fusion fabrication and characterization of crack-free aluminum alloy 6061 using in-process powder bed induction heating. In Proceedings of the Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. pp. 214–227Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bertoli US, Wolfer AJ, Matthews MJ, Delplanque J-PR, Schoenung JM (2017) On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des 113:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL (2017) Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 14:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shipley H, McDonnell D, Culleton M, Lupoi R, O’Donnell G, Trimble D (2018) Optimisation of process parameters to address fundamental challenges during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 128:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Song B, Dong S, Zhang B, Liao H, Coddet C (2012) Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Des 35:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hann DB, Iammi J, Folkes J (2011) A simple methodology for predicting laser-weld properties from material and laser parameters. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:445401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE, Kamath C, Rubenchik AM (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214:2915–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li R, Liu J, Shi Y, Wang L, Jiang W (2012) Balling behavior of stainless steel and nickel powder during selective laser melting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:1025–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oyar P (2018) Laser sintering technology and balling phenomenon. Photomed Laser Surg 36:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S, Nomura N (2014) Fabrication of titanium alloy frameworks for complete dentures by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 112:1441–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yadroitsev I, Gusarov A, Yadroitsava I, Smurov I (2010) Single track formation in selective laser melting of metal powders. J Mater Process Technol 210:1624–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenthal D (1941) Mathematical theory of heat distribution during welding and cutting. Weld J 20:220–234Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bontha S, Klingbeil NW, Kobryn PA, Fraser HL (2009) Effects of process variables and size-scale on solidification microstructure in beam-based fabrication of bulky 3D structures. Mater Sci Eng A 513–514:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Promoppatum P, Yao S-C, Pistorius PC, Rollett AD (2017) A comprehensive comparison of the analytical and numerical prediction of the thermal history and solidification microstructure of Inconel 718 products made by laser powder-bed fusion. Engineering 3:685–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beuth J, Klingbeil N (2001) The role of process variables in laser-based direct metal solid freeform fabrication. JOM 53:36–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen NT, Ohta A, Matsuoka K, Suzuki N, Maeda Y Analytical solutions for transient temperature of semi-infinite body subjected to 3-D moving heat sources, p 10Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gladush GG, Smurov I (2011) Physics of laser materials processing: theory and experiment; Springer Science & Business Media, Vol. 146; ISBN 3-642-19831-7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rubenchik AM, King WE, Wu SS (2018) Scaling laws for the additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 257:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Promoppatum P, Yao S-C, Pistorius PC, Rollett AD, Coutts PJ, Lia F, Martukanitz R (2018) Numerical modeling and experimental validation of thermal history and microstructure for additive manufacturing of an Inconel 718 product. Progress in Additive Manufacturing:1–18. https://link.springer.com/journal/40964
  36. 36.
    Li Y, Gu D (2014) Parametric analysis of thermal behavior during selective laser melting additive manufacturing of aluminum alloy powder. Mater Des 63:856–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kusuma C (2016) The effect of laser power and scan speed on melt pool characteristics of pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy for selective laser melting.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kusuma C, Ahmed SH, Mian A, Srinivasan R (2017) Effect of laser power and scan speed on melt pool characteristics of commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti). J Mater Eng Perform 26:3560–3568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cheng B, Lydon J, Cooper K, Cole V, Northrop P, Chou K (2018) Melt pool sensing and size analysis in laser powder-bed metal additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 32:744–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Steuben JC, Birnbaum AJ, Michopoulos JG, Iliopoulos AP (2019) Enriched analytical solutions for additive manufacturing modeling and simulation. Addit Manuf 25:437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Starr T, Stucker B (2013) The effects of processing parameters on defect regularity in Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, TX, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Choi J-P, Shin G-H, Yang S, Yang D-Y, Lee J-S, Brochu M, Yu J-H (2017) Densification and microstructural investigation of Inconel 718 parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Powder Technol 310:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations