Advertisement

Evaluation of the impact of scanning strategies on residual stresses in selective laser melting

  • L. MugwagwaEmail author
  • D. Dimitrov
  • S. Matope
  • I. Yadroitsev
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

The occurrence of residual stresses in selective laser melting (SLM) presents challenges that limit the capability of the process to manufacture parts at industrial scale. These stresses can have irreversible effects such as warping and cracking of parts during and post manufacturing. One of the most important SLM parameters that should be controlled carefully in order to effectively manage residual stresses is the scanning strategy. This study presents an evaluation of four different scanning strategies, namely the island, successive, successive chessboard and least heat influence (LHI) scanning strategies with respect to their influence on residual stresses and distortions. All the scanning strategies were investigated by melting single tracks on tool steel substrates without powder. Measurement of residual stresses was performed on selected positions on the substrates before and after exposure to the laser beam using the x-ray diffraction technique. The successive chessboard scanning strategy was found to contribute to the least average residual stresses, and lowered residual stress by up to 40% relative to the default island scanning strategy. Further to this, the influence of the successive chessboard and island scanning strategies on distortions was evaluated. Similar to the residual stress findings, the successive chessboard contributed to lower form deviations compared to the island strategy. The scanning strategies were also evaluated based on their impact on total scanning times, with the successive chessboard strategy showing slightly lower scanning time than that for the island and LHI chessboard strategies.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Scanning strategies Residual stresses X-ray diffraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Research Foundation of South Africa for supporting this research. Many thanks to the staff at Nelson Mandela University for their assistance with XRD measurement of residual stresses.

Funding information

The Department of Science and Technology of South Africa is acknowledged for the funding under the Collaborative Programme on Additive Manufacturing.

References

  1. 1.
    Gusarov AV, Pavlov M, Smurov I (2011) Residual stresses at laser surface remelting and additive manufacturing. Phys Procedia 12:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.032. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ali H, Ma L, Ghadbeigi H, Mumtaz K (2017) In-situ residual stress reduction, martensitic decomposition and mechanical properties enhancement through high temperature powder bed pre-heating of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A 695:211–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang B, Dembinski L, Coddet C (2013) The study of the laser parameters and environment variables effect on mechanical properties of high compact parts elaborated by selective laser melting 316L powder. Mater Sci Eng A 584:21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiomi M, Osakada K, Nakamura K, Yamashita T, Abe F (2004) Residual stress within metallic model made by selective laser melting process. CIRP Ann 53:195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60677-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kempen K, Thijs L, Vrancken B, Buls S, Van Humbeek J, Kruth J-P (2013) Lowering thermal gradients in selective laser melting by pre-heating the baseplate. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, pp 131–139. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/34572651.pdf
  6. 6.
    Furumoto T, Ueda T, Abdul Aziz M, Hosokawa A, Tanaka R (2010) Study on reduction of residual stress induced during rapid tooling process: influence of heating conditions on residual stress. Key Eng Mater 447–448:785–789.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.447-448.785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts IA (2012) Investigation of residual stresses in the laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing, PhD Thesis, University of WolverhamptonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker T, Dimitrov D (2016) The achievable mechanical properties of SLM produced Maraging Steel 300 components. Rapid Prototyp J 22:487–494.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2014-0096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mercelis P, Kruth J (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12:254–265.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papadakis L, Chantzis D, Salonitis K (2018) On the energy efficiency of pre-heating methods in SLM/SLS processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:1325–1338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1287-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pupo Y, Delgado J, Serenó L, Ciurana J (2013) Scanning space analysis in selective laser melting for CoCrMo powder. Procedia Engineering 63:370–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.228
  12. 12.
    Manfredi D, Calignano F, Krishnan M, Canali R, Ambrosio E, Atzeni E (2013) From powders to dense metal parts: characterization of a commercial AlSiMg alloy processed through direct metal laser sintering. Materials 6:856–869.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6030856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61:1–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bo Q, Yu-sheng S, Qing-song W, Hai-bo W (2012) The helix scan strategy applied to the selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:631–640.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3922-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairalla SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2:041304.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thijs L, Verhaeghe F, Craeghs T, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth JP (2010) A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 58:3303–3312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jhabvala J, Boillat E, Antignac T, Glardon R (2010) On the effect of scanning strategies in the selective laser melting process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 5:99–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452751003688368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kruth J-P, Deckers J, Yasa E, Wauthle R (2012) Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226:980–991.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412437085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Töppel T, Müller B, Hoeren KPJ, Witt G (2016) Eigenspannungen und verzug bei der additiven fertigung durch laserstrahlschmelzen. Schweissen Und Schneiden 68:176–186Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaeh MF, Branner G (2010) Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting. Prod Eng 4:35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0192-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu AS, Brown DW, Kumar M, Gallegos GF, King WE (2014) An experimental investigation into additive manufacturing-induced residual stresses in 316L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 45:6260–6270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li C, Fu CH, Guo YB, Fang FZ (2016) A multiscale modeling approach for fast prediction of part distortion in selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol 229:703–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.022. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carter LN, Martin C, Withers PJ, Attallah MM (2014) The influence of the laser scan strategy on grain structure and cracking behaviour in SLM powder-bed fabricated nickel superalloy. J Alloys Compd 615:338–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kruth JP, Froyen L, Van Vaerenbergh J, Mercelis P, Rombouts M, Lauwers B (2004) Selective laser melting of iron-based powder. J Mater Process Technol 149:616–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ali H, Ghadbeigi H, Mumtaz K (2018) Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A 712:175–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mugwagwa L, Dimitrov D, Matope S, Becker T (2016) A methodology to evaluate the influence of part geometry on residual stresses in selective laser melting. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing, Stellenbosch, pp 133–139. Available at http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/99209
  27. 27.
    Kandil FA, Lord JD, Fry AT, Grant PV (2001) A review of residual stress measurement methods - a guide to technical selection. NPL Report MATC (A) 4. http://www.npl.co.uk/publications/a-review-of-residual-stress-measurement-methods-aguide-to-technique-selection
  28. 28.
    Fitzpatrick ME, Fry AT, Holdway P, Kandil FA, Shackleton J, Suominen L (2005) Determination of residual stresses by X-ray diffraction. Meas Good Pract Guid 52:1–68Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Belassel M, Pineault J, Brauss ME (2006) Comparison and evaluation of residual stress measurement techniques, a technical and economical study. In: SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Saint Louis, pp 756–762. http://semimac.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/sem.org-2006-SEM-Ann-Confs29p02-Comparison-Evaluation-Residual-Stress-Measurement-Techniques-A.pdf
  30. 30.
    Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD (2016) Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf 12:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I (2015) Evaluation of residual stress in stainless steel 316L and Ti6Al4V samples produced by selective laser melting. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:67–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1026045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vrancken B, Cain V, Knutsen R, Van Humbeeck J (2014) Residual stress via the contour method in compact tension specimens produced via selective laser melting. Scr Mater 87:29–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vrancken B, Wauthle R, Kruth J, Van Humbeeck J (2013) Study of the influence of material properties on residual stress in selective laser melting. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, pp 393–407. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2013/2013-31-Vrancken.pdf
  34. 34.
    Rickenbacher L, Spierings A, Wegener K (2013) An integrated cost-model for selective laser melting (SLM). Rapid Prototyp J 19:208–214.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541311312201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stellenbosch Technology Centre – Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing, Department of Industrial EngineeringStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringCentral University of TechnologyBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations