Advertisement

A manufacturing cost analysis framework to evaluate machining and fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing approaches

  • R. J. UrbanicEmail author
  • S. M. Saqib
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The goal of this research is to develop a costing framework and explore opportunities for fabricating components using additive manufacturing (AM) and machining approaches. The examples target plastic machining, and the fused deposition modeling AM process, but the general model structure is applicable for other AM processes as process knowledge is developed. The question “when is machining more cost-effective than AM” has not been comprehensively addressed. The purpose of this work is to develop a costing framework to provide insight on whether to use machining or AM. An estimation model which considers the process planning, setup, and fabrication time-cost elements is developed in a structured manner. This is challenging due to the machining process planning complexity, the decision-making, and the skill set required, especially for complex surface finish machining. This framework can be readily adapted to suit specific environments. The estimation time models are linked to a cost model, and comparisons are drawn, based on the form complexity and manufacturing quantity. An effective combination of AM and machining technologies could bring about a new hybrid manufacturing approach that meets the requirements of the next generation of production systems, especially for short-run production. A cost-benefit analysis is performed to illustrate solution approaches for designing additive, subtractive, or hybrid operation sets for a variety of components to highlight the merits of the presented approach. Exploring a larger solution space of processing options and their processing time and costs will allow designers to generate more cost-competitive solutions.

Keywords

Fused deposition modeling Machining Costing model framework Hybrid process planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding

This research is partially funded by the NSERC Discovery Grant research program.

References

  1. 1.
    Karunakaran SKP, Suryakumar S, Pushpa V, Akula S (2010) Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26:490–499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Onwubolu GC, Davim J, Oliveira C, Cardoso A (2007) Prediction of clad angle in laser cladding by powder using response surface methodology and scatter search. Opt Laser Technol 39:1130–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2006.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eiliat H, Urbanic RJ (2018) Visualizing, analyzing, and managing voids in the material extrusion process, The Inter. J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9–12):4095–4109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Urbanic RJ, Burford C, Hedrick R (2018) Virtual quality assessment tools for material extrusion processes. Comput-Aided Des Applic 15:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2017.1419640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urbanic R, DiCecco L (2015) Development of adaptable light weighting methods for material extrusion processes. ASME. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing ():V02AT02A003.  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-51174
  6. 6.
    Kaynak B, Spoerk M, Shirole A, Ziegler W, Sapkota J (2018) Polypropylene/cellulose composites for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Macromol Mater Eng 303:1800037.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Cano S, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Sapkota J, Holzer C (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials 11:840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahn S-H, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright P (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modelling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal 8(4):248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210441166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radstok E (1999) Rapid tooling. Rapid Prototyp J 5(4):164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee CW, Chua CK, Chea CM, Tan LH, Feng C (2004) Rapid investment casting: direct and indirect approaches via fused deposition modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 23(1):93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1694 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy GN, Schindel R, Kruth JP (2003) Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing technologies, state-of-the-art and future perspective. Manuf Technol J 52(2):589–609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60206-6. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saqib S, Urbanic RJ (2011) An experimental study to determine geometric and dimensional accuracy impact factors for fused deposition modelled parts. 4th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production. 293–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
  13. 13.
    Rayegani F, Onwubolu G (2014) Fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (GMDH) and differential evolution (DE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1):509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steuben J, Iliopoulos A, Michopoulos J (2016) Implicit slicing for functionally tailored additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 77:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phatak AM, Pandey SS (2012) Optimum part orientation in rapid prototyping using genetic algorithm. J Manuf Syst 31:395–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gogate AS, Pande SS (2008) Intelligent layout planning for rapid prototyping. Int J Prod Res 46(20):5607–5631.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701277002 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ismail D, Rukiye E (2014) Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):228–235.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Volapato N, Foggiatto JA, Schwarz DC (2014) The influence of support base on FDM accuracy in Z. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2012-0116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh H, Rayegani F, Onwubolu G. Cost optimization of FDM additive manufactured parts. ASME. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing ():V02AT02A005.  https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-36697
  20. 20.
    Eiliat H (2018) Development of optimal material extrusion additive manufacturing tool path parameters for minimizing void regions using contemporary tool path solutions, PhD Thesis, University of WindsorGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Townsend V, Urbanic RJ (2012) Relating additive and subtractive processes in a teleological and modular approach. Rapid Prototyp J 18(4):324–338.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211231752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hur J, Kunwoo L, Zhu-hu, Kim J (2002) Hybrid rapid prototyping system using machining and deposition. Comput Aided Des 34:741–754.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00203-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    AM Staff (2018) Thermwood offers large scale additive manufacturing (LSAM) line, AM additive manufacturing, Copyright © Gardner Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bentzen N, Laussen E (2018) Using recycled and bio-based plastics for additive manufacturing a case study on a low volume car component. Master’s thesis in product development, MASc. Thesis, Department of Industrial and Materials Science CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Urbanic RJ, Hedrick RW, Saqib S, Nazemi N (2018) Material bead deposition with 2 + 2 ½ multi-axis machining process planning strategies with virtual verification for extruded geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3167–3184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1376-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Automotive, and Materials EngineeringUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations