Comparative study of PVD and CVD cutting tools performance in milling of duplex stainless steel

  • R. P. Martinho
  • F. J. G. SilvaEmail author
  • C. Martins
  • H. Lopes


The machining process evolution has been accompanied by the improvement of tool performance, being this mainly due to the development of thin coatings, mono and multi-layered, providing the most appropriate set of properties for each machining condition. On the other hand, duplex stainless steels have registered a strong increase in demand, which, in many cases, requires the use of machining processes in order to obtain the final shape accurately. Taking into account these two aspects, this paper aims essentially to evaluate the performance of two cutting inserts with PVD and CVD coatings, used in rough milling operations of duplex stainless steel. The cutting parameters and machining conditions were those recommended by the manufacturer and were kept unchanged in all performed tests. The behavior of the PVD- and CVD-coated cutting tools was assessed using three different facets: (a) surface roughness analysis, (b) tool wear evaluation, and (c) the monitoring of vibration levels produced during each test. CVD (TiN/TiCN/Al2O3)-coated inserts showed very good suitability to be used as tools for roughing milling operations when machining super duplex stainless steels.


Milling Cutting tools Coatings Wear Tools life Duplex stainless steel Vibration level 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank Daniel Figueiredo from PALBIT Company for the tools assigned to carry out this work. Authors also thank the ARSOPI Company for the duplex stainless steel assigned to this investigation. F. J. G. Silva also thanks Rui Rocha from CEMUP, for his dedication and professionalism in the SEM and EDS equipment operation and analysis.


  1. 1.
    Rajaguru J, Arunachalam N (2017) Coated tool performance in dry turning of super duplex stainless steel. Procedia Manuf 10:601–611. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paiva JMF Jr, Amorim FJ, Soares PC Jr, Veldhuis SC (2017) Tribological behavior of superduplex stainless steel against PVD hard coatings on cemented carbide. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1649–1658. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iacoviello F, Di Cocco V, D’Agostino L (2017) Integranular corrosion susceptibility analysis in austeno-ferritic (duplex) stainless steels. Procedia Struct Integrity 3:276–282. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo H, Li XG, Dong CF, Xiao K (2017) Effect of solution treatment on pitting behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel. Arab J Chem 10:S90–S94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwarm SC, Mburu S, Kolli RP, Perea DE, Ankem S (2018) Effects of long-term thermal aging on bulk and local mechanical behavior of ferritic-austenitic duplex stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A 720:130–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang Z, Zhang H, Hu J, Qi X, Bian Y, Shen A, Xu P, Zhao Y (2018) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of briefly heat-treated SAF 2507 super duplex stainless steel welds. Constr Build Mater 168:338–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tavares SSM, Scandian C, Pardal JM, Luz TS, da Silva FJ (2010) Failure analysis of duplex stainless steel weld used in flexible pipes in off shore oil production. Eng Fail Anal 17:1500–1506. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou N (2016) Surface integrity of 2304 duplex stainless steel after different grinding operations. J Mater Process Technol 229:294–304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jebaraj AV, Ajaykumar L, Deepak CR, Aditya KVV (2017) Weldability, machinability and surfacing of commercial duplex stainless steel AISI2205 for marine applications – a recent review. J Adv Res 8:183–199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paro J, Hänninen H, Kauppinen V (2001) Tool wear and machinability of HIPed P/M and conventional cast duplex stainless steels. Wear 249:279–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biksa A, Yamamoto K, Dosbaeva G, Veldhuis SC, Fox-Rabinovich GS, Elfizy A, Wagg T, Shuster LS (2010) Wear behavior of adaptive nano-multilayered AlTiN / me x N PVD coatings during machining of aerospace alloys. Tribol Int 43:1491–1499. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nomani J, Pramanik A, Hilditch T, Littlefair G (2013) Machinability study of first generation duplex (2205), second generation duplex (2507) and austenite stainless steel during drilling process. Wear 304(1):20–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Airao J, Chaudhary B, Bajpai V, Khanna N (2018) An experimental study of surface roughness variation in end milling of super duplex 2507 stainless steel. Mater Today Proc 5:3682–3689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Krolczyk JB, Nieslony P, Wojciechowski S, Legutko S (2018) Parametric and nonparametric description of the surface topography in the dry and MQCL cutting conditions. Meas J Int Meas Confed 121:225–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krolczyk GM, Maruda RW, Nieslony P, Wieczorowski M (2016) Surface morphology analysis of duplex stainless steel (DSS) in clean production using the power spectral density. Measurement 94:464–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Selvaraj DP (2017) Optimization of cutting force of duplex stainless steel in dry milling operation. Mater Today Proc 4:11141–11147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM A995/A995M-18, Standard specification for castings, austenitic-ferritic (duplex) stainless steel, for pressure-containing parts, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, DOI:
  18. 18.
    Zhang JZ, Chen JC, Kirby ED (2007) Surface roughness optimization in an end-milling operation using the Taguchi design method. J Mater Process Technol 184:233–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saï WB, Salah NB, Lebrun JL (2001) Influence of machining by finishing milling on surface characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:443–450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gouveia RM, Silva FJG, Reis P, Baptista AMP (2016) Machining duplex stainless steel: comparative study regarding end mill coated tools. Coatings 6:51–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krolczyk GM, Nieslony P, Legutko S (2014) Determination of tool life and research wear during duplex stainless steel turning. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15(2):347–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    EN 10088–1:2014–12, Stainless steels - part 1: list of stainless steels; German version EN 10088–1:2014, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2014.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Oliveira CA Jr, Diniz AE, Bertazzoli R (2013) Correlating tool wear, surface roughness and corrosion resistance in the turning process of super duplex stainless steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 36(4):775–785. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E, Simsek BT (2013) Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J Clean Prod 42:159–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koyee RD, Heisela U, Eisselera R, Schmauder S (2014) Modeling and optimization of turning duplex stainless steels. J Manuf Process 16(4):451–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krolczyk GM, Nieslony P, Maruda RW, Wojciechowski S (2017) Dry cutting effect in turning of a duplex stainless steel as a key factor in clean production. J Clean Prod 142(4):3343–3354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krolczyk G, Gajek M, Legutko S (2013) Predicting the tool life in the dry machining of duplex stainless steel. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 15(1): 62–65. Retrieved online on 21st May 2018.
  28. 28.
    Ahmed YS, Paiva JM, Covelli D, Veldhuis SC (2018) Investigation of coated cutting tool performance during machining of super duplex stainless steels through 3D wear evaluations. Coatings 7:127–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Paiva JMF, Torres RD, Amorim FL, Covelli D, Tauhiduzzaman M, Veldhuis S, Dosbaeva G, Fox-Rabinovich G (2017) Frictional and wear performance of hard coatings during machining of superduplex stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1–4):423–432. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martinho RP, Silva FJG, Baptista APM (2007) Wear behaviour of uncoated and diamond coated Si3N4 tools under severe turning conditions. Wear 263:1417–1422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pellizzari M (2011) High temperature wear and friction behaviour of nitrided, PVD-duplex and CVD coated tool steel against 6082 Al alloy. Wear 271(9–10):2089–2099. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martinho RP, Silva FJG, Baptista APM (2008) Cutting forces and wear analysis of Si3N4 diamond coated tools in high speed machining. Vacuum 82:1415–1420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dos Santos AG, da Silva MB, Jackson MJ (2018) Tungsten carbide micro-tool wear when micro milling UNS S32205 duplex stainless steel. Wear 414-415:109–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krolczyk GM, Nieslony P, Legutko S (2015) Determination of tool life and research wear during duplex stainless steel turning. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15(2):347–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DEM-ISEP (School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto)PortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations