Advertisement

Microstructural evolution and room temperature mechanical properties of AZ31 alloy processed through hot constrained compression

  • Abbas Ghorbani
  • Amir Zarei-HanzakiEmail author
  • Pooriya Dastranjy Nezhadfar
  • Mohammad Hadi Maghsoudi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The present study deals with the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy processed throughout the novel hot constrained compression (HCC) method. AZ31 core specimens constrained by steel sleeves were compressed in the temperature range of 100 to 600 °C at 0.1 s−1 strain rate, up to true strain of 0.6 mm/mm. Similarly, simple compression (SC) tests were carried out on the AZ31 specimens to compare with the HCC ones. The AZ31 specimens failed under SC while the HCC process was successfully conducted without any sign of failure. This phenomenon is attributed to the hydrostatic pressure imposed by the sleeve steel. Moreover, microstructure characterization revealed that the greater strain accommodation in the HCC case is a result of grain refinement due to severe twinning and preceded dynamic recrystallization (DRX) at low and high temperatures, respectively. Nonetheless, the HCC process beyond 460 °C led to grain growth and coarser microstructure as compared to the SC counterparts. Mechanical properties of processed specimens were investigated at room temperature using shear punch tests. Results indicated that while shear strength and formability of HCC products are premier at low temperature deformation, they are attenuated by increasing the temperature beyond 460 °C. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the different grain size distribution and the effects of γ precipitants.

Keywords

Hot-deformation Hot constrained compression AZ31 alloy Shear punch test Twinning Hydrostatic pressure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Kulekci MK (2008) Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(9–10):851–865Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emley E (1966) Principles of magnesium technology Pergamon Press, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts CS, Magnesium and its Alloys, Wiley1960Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Housh S, Mikucki B, Stevenson A (1990) Selection and application of magnesium and magnesium alloys, ASM International, Metals Handbook, Tenth Edition 2:455–479Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marya M, Hector LG, Verma R, Tong W (2006) Microstructural effects of AZ31 magnesium alloy on its tensile deformation and failure behaviors. Mater Sci Eng A 418(1–2):341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan AS, Pandey A, Gnäupel-Herold T, Mishra RK (2011) Mechanical response and texture evolution of AZ31 alloy at large strains for different strain rates and temperatures. Int J Plast 27(5):688–706CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raynor GV (1959) The physical metallurgy of magnesium and its alloys, PergamonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nezhadfar PD, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Sohn SS, Abedi HR (2016) Characterization of twin-like structure in a ferrite-based lightweight steel. Met Mater Int 22(5):810–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nezhadfar PD, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Sohn SS, Abedi HR (2016) The microstructure evolution and room temperature deformation behavior of ferrite-based lightweight steel. Mater Sci Eng A 665:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Draugelates U, Schram A, Kedenburg CC (2000) Superplasticity of magnesium-based alloys, Magnesium alloys and their applications 342–347Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mabuchi M, Asahina T, Iwasaki H, Higashi K (1997) Experimental investigation of superplastic behaviour in magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Technol 13(10):825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Del Valle J, Carreño F, Ruano OA (2006) Influence of texture and grain size on work hardening and ductility in magnesium-based alloys processed by ECAP and rolling. Acta Mater 54(16):4247–4259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnett M, Keshavarz Z, Beer A, Atwell D (2004) Influence of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn. Acta Mater 52(17):5093–5103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mintz B, Yue S, Jonas J (1991) Hot ductility of steels and its relationship to the problem of transverse cracking during continuous casting. Int Mater Rev 36(1):187–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aghion E, Bronfin B, Eliezer D (2001) The role of the magnesium industry in protecting the environment. J Mater Process Technol 117(3):381–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agnew SR, Duygulu Ö (2005) Plastic anisotropy and the role of non-basal slip in magnesium alloy AZ31B. Int J Plast 21(6):1161–1193CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atwell D, Barnett M, Hutchinson W (2012) The effect of initial grain size and temperature on the tensile properties of magnesium alloy AZ31 sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 549:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.R. Brooks, Heat treatment, structure and properties of nonferrous alloys, American Society for metals Ohio1982Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fatemi-Varzaneh S, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Haghshenas M (2008) A study on the effect of thermo-mechanical parameters on the deformation behavior of Mg–3Al–1Zn. Mater Sci Eng A 497(1–2):438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abedi H, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Khoddam S (2011) Effect of γ precipitates on the cavitation behavior of wrought AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Des 32(4):2181–2190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abedi H, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Fatemi-Varzaneh S, Roostaei AA (2010) The semi-solid tensile deformation behavior of wrought AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Des 31(9):4386–4391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bordeaux F, Dang M, Baudelet B (1994) Percolation and damage behaviour in materials with liquid grain boundaries. J Mater Sci 29(11):3023–3030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myshlyaev M, McQueen H, Mwembela A, Konopleva E (2002) Twinning, dynamic recovery and recrystallization in hot worked Mg–Al–Zn alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 337(1–2):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konopleva E, Mwembela A, McQueen H (1997) Microstructural development in Mg alloy AZ31 during hot working. Scr Mater 37(11):1789–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Agnew, Plastic anisotropy of magnesium alloy AZ31B sheet, Essential Readings in Magnesium Technology, Springer 2016, pp. 351–356Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pötzsch A, Klimanek P (2000) X-ray substructure analysis in polycrystalline magnesium compressed at different strain rates and temperatures. Metal Matrix Composites and Metallic Foams 5:259–264Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Gottstein G (2001) Correlation of plastic deformation and dynamic recrystallization in magnesium alloy ZK60. Acta Mater 49(7):1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ion S, Humphreys F, White S (1982) Dynamic recrystallisation and the development of microstructure during the high temperature deformation of magnesium. Acta Metall 30(10):1909–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sellars C (1979) Dynamic recrystallization. Metalurgia i Odlewnictwo 5(3):377–404Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2012) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaibyshev R, Sitdikov O (1992) Structural changes during plastic deformation of pure magnesium [Previously titled: Structure changes during plastic deformation of pure magnesium.]. Physics of Metals and Metallography(Russia)(UK) 73(6):635–642Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu X, Jonas J, Li L, Zhu B (2013) Flow softening, twinning and dynamic recrystallization in AZ31 magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 583:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sitdikov O, Kaibyshev R (2001) Dynamic recrystallization in pure magnesium. Mater Trans 42(9):1928–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kainer K (1996) Superplasticity in extruded magnesium alloys, Proceedings of the Third International Magnesium Conference, pp. 533–543Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ding R, Wang B-j, Wang C, Shi X-1 (2010) Research on grain refining methods and mechanisms of AZ31 magnesium alloy [J]. Light Alloy Fabrication Technology 1:005Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Fatemi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, Review on ultrafined/nanostructured magnesium alloys produced through severe plastic deformation: microstructures, Journal of Ultrafine Grained and Nanostructured Materials 48(2) (2015) 69–83Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kawasaki M, Figueiredo RB, Langdon TG (2012) Twenty-five years of severe plastic deformation: recent developments in evaluating the degree of homogeneity through the thickness of disks processed by high-pressure torsion. J Mater Sci 47(22):7719–7725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fatemi-Varzaneh S, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Cabrera J (2011) Shear banding phenomenon during severe plastic deformation of an AZ31 magnesium alloy. J Alloys Compd 509(9):3806–3810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang Y, Jiang S, Hu L, Liang Y (2013) Deformation mechanism of NiTi shape memory alloy subjected to severe plastic deformation at low temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 559:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jiang S, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Zheng Y (2013) Influence of annealing on NiTi shape memory alloy subjected to severe plastic deformation. Intermetallics 32:344–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gang L, Wang L-L, Yuan S-J, Wang Z-R (2006) Compressive formability of 7075 aluminum alloy rings under hydrostatic pressure. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 16(5):1103–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. Standard, E209–65 (1993) Standard practice for compression tests of metallic materials at elevated temperatures with conventional or rapid heating rates and strain rates. ASTM, Philadelphia, p 383Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Standard, E112-13, standard test method for determining average grain size. West Conshohocken, PA (2013) 1–28Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A.S.f. Testing, Materials, ASTM E562-11: Standard test method for determining volume fraction by systematic manual point count, ASTM, 2011Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roostaei AA, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H, Rokni M (2011) An investigation into the mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of the accumulative roll bonded AZ31 Mg alloy upon annealing. Mater Des 32(5):2963–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Elwazri A, Varano R, Wanjara P, Yue S (2006) Effect of specimen thickness and punch diameter in shear punch testing. Can Metall Q 45(1):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Masoumi M, Zarandi F, Pekguleryuz M (2011) Microstructure and texture studies on twin-roll cast az31 (mg–3 wt.% al–1 wt.% zn) alloy and the effect of thermomechanical processing. Mater Sci Eng A 528(3):1268–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stanford N, Sotoudeh K, Bate P (2011) Deformation mechanisms and plastic anisotropy in magnesium alloy AZ31. Acta Mater 59(12):4866–4874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Koike J, Ohyama R, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Maruyama K (2003) Grain-boundary sliding in AZ31 magnesium alloys at room temperature to 523 K. Mater Trans 44(4):445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eskandari M, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Pilehva F, Abedi H, Fatemi-Varzaneh S, Khalesian A (2013) Ductility improvement in AZ31 magnesium alloy using constrained compression testing technique. Mater Sci Eng A 576:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Li F, Li J, Chu G, Liu X (2010) Investigation of the diffluence mechanism of an aluminium alloy ring under compression. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 224(4):771–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xia K, Wang J, Wu X, Chen G, Gurvan M (2005) Equal channel angular pressing of magnesium alloy AZ31. Mater Sci Eng A 410:324–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Huang Y, Figueiredo RB, Baudin T, Brisset F, Langdon TG (2012) Evolution of strength and homogeneity in a magnesium AZ31 alloy processed by high-pressure torsion at different temperatures. Adv Eng Mater 14(11):1018–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fatemi-Varzaneh S, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Beladi H (2007) Dynamic recrystallization in AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 456(1–2):52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kim H, Kim W (2004) Microstructural instability and strength of an AZ31 Mg alloy after severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 385(1–2):300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yin D, Zhang K, Wang G, Han W (2005) Warm deformation behavior of hot-rolled AZ31 Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 392(1–2):320–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kim H, Lee J-H, Lee C, Bang W, Ahn S, Chang Y (2012) Shear band formation during hot compression of AZ31 Mg alloy sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 558:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Maksoud IA, Ahmed H, Rödel J (2009) Investigation of the effect of strain rate and temperature on the deformability and microstructure evolution of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 504(1–2):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gladman T (1966) On the theory of the effect of precipitate particles on grain growth in metals. Proc R Soc Lond A 294(1438):298–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Changizian P, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H (2012) On the recrystallization behavior of homogenized AZ81 magnesium alloy: the effect of mechanical twins and γ precipitates. Mater Sci Eng A 558:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jin Q, Shim S-Y, Lim S-G (2006) Correlation of microstructural evolution and formation of basal texture in a coarse grained Mg–Al alloy during hot rolling. Scr Mater 55(9):843–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Knezevic M, Levinson A, Harris R, Mishra RK, Doherty RD, Kalidindi SR (2010) Deformation twinning in AZ31: influence on strain hardening and texture evolution. Acta Mater 58(19):6230–6242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hokka M, Seidt J, Matrka T, Gilat A, Kuokkala V.-T, Nykänen J, Müller S (2011) Compression behavior of near-UFG AZ31 Mg-alloy at high strain rates, Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Volume 1, Springer, pp. 295–301Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rusz S, Cizek L, Hadasik E, Donic T, Tylsar S, Salajka M, Kedron J, Klos M, Bobek P (2013) Combination of ECAP process and heat treatment to achieve refining structure of selected magnesium alloys, Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Rim International Congress on Advanced Materials and Processing, Springer, pp. 3275–3282Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Complex Laboratory of Hot Deformation & Thermo-mechanical Processing of High Performance Engineering Materials, School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations