Formability of polycarbonate sheets in single-point incremental forming

  • Massimo Durante
  • Antonio Formisano
  • Francesco Lambiase


The paper investigates the influence of tool diameter, sheet thickness, and geometry of the workpiece during single-point incremental forming (SPIF) of polycarbonate sheets. An experimental campaign was conducted and involved varying and fixed slope angle tests. The process was performed at room temperature. Cone and pyramid frusta geometries were analyzed. A FE model was developed to determine stress, strain, and thickness distributions during the process. Different defects affected the formability of the polymer, namely thinning, twisting, and wrinkling. Significant differences were found with respect to SPIF of metals due to mechanical behavior of the polycarbonate, in terms of amount of thinning, twisting, and wrinkling. The mechanism of development of the abovementioned defects was identified as well as how they are influenced by the process parameters. The comparison of fixed and varying slope angle tests indicated that these latter were not fully representative of the formability of the sheets. The presence of geometrical singularities in pyramid frusta affected the formability of the materials. This was due to great localization of thinning at the edges and the increase of the forming loads as approaching these regions.


Single-point incremental forming Polycarbonate Formability Failure modes FEM 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lozano-Sánchez LM, Sustaita AO, Soto M, Biradar S, Ge L, Segura-Cárdenas E, Diabb J, Elizalde LE, Barrera EV, Elías-Zúniga A (2017) Mechanical and structural studies on single point incremental forming of polypropylene-MWCNTs composite sheets. J Mater Process Technol 242:218–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards WL, Grimm TJ, Ragai I, Roth JT (2017) Optimum process parameters for springback reduction of single point incrementally formed polycarbonate. Procedia Manuf 10:329–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duflou J, Behera AK, Vanhove H, Bertol L (2013) Manufacture of accurate titanium cranio-facial implants with high forming angle using single point incremental forming. Key Eng Mater 549:223–230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Araújo R, Teixeira P, Silva MB, Reis A, Martins PAF (2013) Single point incremental forming of a medical implant. Key Eng Mater 554-557:1388–1393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martins PAF, Kwiatkowski L, Franzen V, Tekkaya AE, Kleiner M (2009) Single point incremental forming of polymers. CIRP Ann 58:229–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franzen V, Kwiatkowski L, Martins PAF, Tekkaya AE (2009) Single point incremental forming of PVC. J Mater Process Technol 209:462–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marques TA, Silva MB, Martins PAF (2012) On the potential of single point incremental forming of sheet polymer parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:75–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Formisano A, Durante M, Boccarusso L, Astarita A (2017) The influence of thermal oxidation and tool sheet contact conditions on the formability and the surface quality of incrementally formed grade 1 titanium thin sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:3723–3732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hussain G, Gao L, Zhang ZY (2008) Formability evaluation of a pure titanium sheet in the cold incremental forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:920–926. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Kyriacos D (2017) Chapter 17—polycarbonates. In: Gilbert M (ed) Brydson’s plastics materials, 8th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 457–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu D, Wu W, Malhotra R, Chen J, Lu B, Cao J (2013) Mechanism investigation for the influence of tool rotation and laser surface texturing (LST) on formability in single point incremental forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 73:37–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang J, Li L, Jiang H (2016) Effects of forming parameters on temperature in frictional stir incremental sheet forming. J Mech Sci Technol 30:2163–2169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bagudanch I, Martínez-Romero O, Elías-Zúñiga A, Garcia-Romeu ML (2014) Identifying polymeric constitutive equations for incremental sheet forming modelling. Procedia Eng 81:2292–2297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Durante M, Formisano A, Lambiase F (2018) Incremental forming of polycarbonate sheets. J Mater Process Technol 253:57–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duflou JR, Vanhove H, Verbert J, Gu J, Vasilakos I, Eyckens P (2010) Twist revisited: twist phenomena in single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann 59:307–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aerens R, Eyckens P, Van Bael A, Duflou JR (2010) Force prediction for single point incremental forming deduced from experimental and FEM observations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:969–982. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lambiase F, Paoletti A, Di Ilio A (2015) Mechanical behaviour of friction stir spot welds of polycarbonate sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:301–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perez J (1998) Physics and mechanics of amorphous polymers. In: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cao K, Ma X, Zhang B, Wang Y, Wang Y (2010) Tensile behavior of polycarbonate over a wide range of strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A 527:4056–4061. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A (2011) Observations on the influence of tool-sheet contact conditions on an incremental forming process. J Mater Eng Perform 20:941–946. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Formisano A, Boccarusso L, Capece Minutolo F, Carrino L, Durante M, Langella A (2017) Negative and positive incremental forming: comparison by geometrical, experimental, and FEM considerations. Mater Manuf Process 32:530–536. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vanhove H, Verbert J, Gu J, Duflou JR (2010) An experimental study of twist phenomena in single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 3:975–978. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asghar J, Lingam R, Shibin E, Reddy NV (2014) Tool path design for enhancement of accuracy in single point incremental forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 228:1027–1035. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bansal A, Lingam R, Yadav SK, Venkata Reddy N (2017) Prediction of forming forces in single point incremental forming. J Manuf Process 28:486–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A, Memola Capece Minutolo F (2009) The influence of tool rotation on an incremental forming process. J Mater Process Technol 209:4621–4626. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Capece Minutolo F, Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A (2007) Evaluation of the maximum slope angle of simple geometries carried out by incremental forming process. J Mater Process Technol 194:145–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Durante
    • 1
  • Antonio Formisano
    • 1
  • Francesco Lambiase
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical, Materials and Production EngineeringUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and EconomicsUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations