Advertisement

Investigation on the effect of heat treatment and process parameters on the tensile behaviour of SLM Ti-6Al-4V parts

  • Amir Mahyar KhorasaniEmail author
  • Ian Gibson
  • Alireza Ghaderi
  • Mazher Iqbal Mohammed
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has various independent parameters that affect the mechanical properties and quality of the produced parts that are not linearly the function of each other. Process parameters in metal AM are very hard to control, analyse and optimise because they affect each other even though they can be independently changed. Changing process parameters in a wide range is not possible due to the formation of problems such as cracks, balling, unmelted powders, porosity and distortion. In this paper, a numerical model to predict the value of tensile strength of selective laser melting (SLM) Ti-6Al-4V parts and analyse the effect of process parameters on the results has been proposed. Taguchi L25 Design of Experiment (DOE) across 125 samples to create a comprehensive and general overview of influential parameters on the build process was investigated. Specifically, parameters included laser power, scan speed, hatch spacing, laser pattern angle and heat treatment (HT). To evaluate and analyse the build process according to established statistical variances, a minimum of five samples based on ASTM standard (for tensile test) were prepared. Heat treatment was added to the DOE to analyse the combined process and post-process effects. Results were compared (cross-validated) against existing values found in the literature and were found to effectively predict and explain the behaviour of tensile strength when changing process parameters.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Mechanical properties Additive manufacturing Tensile properties Heat treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Khorasani A, Gibson I, Goldberg M, Littlefair G (2017) Production of Ti-6Al-4V acetabular shell using selective laser melting: possible limitations in fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J 23(1):110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Janaki Ram GD, Starr T, Stucker B (2015) Influence of defects on mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V components produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. Mater Des 86:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kadirgama K, Harun WSW, Tarlochan F, Samykano M, Ramasamy D, Azir MZ, Mehboob H (2018) Statistical and optimize of lattice structures with selective laser melting (SLM) of Ti6AL4V material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1):495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang P, Zhang DZ, Peng D, Li Z, Mao Z (2018) Rolling contact fatigue performance evaluation of Ti–6Al–4V parts processed by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(9):3533–3543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boschetto A, Bottini L, Veniali F (2018) Surface roughness and radiusing of Ti6Al4V selective laser melting-manufactured parts conditioned by barrel finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5):2773–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khorasani AM (2017) The selected laser melting production and subsequent post-processing of Ti-6Al-4V prosthetic acetabular. Deakin UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teng C, Pal D, Gong H, Zeng K, Briggs K, Patil N, Stucker B (2017) A review of defect modeling in laser material processing. Addit Manuf 14:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gong H et al (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gong H, et al. (2014) Melt pool characterization for selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V pre-alloyed powder. In Solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prashanth KG, Scudino S, Eckert J (2017) Defining the tensile properties of Al-12Si parts produced by selective laser melting. Acta Mater 126:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassn AH, Christopher S, Liang H (2018) Effect of build orientation on the surface quality, microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting 316L stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J 24(1):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao H, Giet S, Yang K, Wu X, Davies CHJ (2016) The influence of processing parameters on aluminium alloy A357 manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Des 109:334–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khorasani A, Gibson I, Goldberg M, Littlefair G (2017) On the role of different annealing heat treatments on mechanical properties and microstructure of selective laser melted and conventional wrought Ti-6Al-4V. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yadroitsev I, Krakhmalev P, Yadroitsava I (2014) Selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V alloy for biomedical applications: temperature monitoring and microstructural evolution. J Alloys Compd 583:404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cao S, Chu R, Zhou X, Yang K, Jia Q, Lim CVS, Huang A, Wu X (2018) Role of martensite decomposition in tensile properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. J Alloys Compd 744:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cai C, Gao X, Teng Q, Li M, Pan K, Song B, Yan C, Wei Q, Shi Y (2018) A novel hybrid selective laser melting/hot isostatic pressing of near-net shaped Ti-6Al-4V alloy using an in-situ tooling: interfacial microstructure evolution and enhanced mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 717:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Savalani MM, Pizarro JM (2016) Effect of preheat and layer thickness on selective laser melting (SLM) of magnesium. Rapid Prototyp J 22(1):115–122Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yadroitsev I, Krakhmalev P, Yadroitsava I, Johansson S, Smurov I (2013) Energy input effect on morphology and microstructure of selective laser melting single track from metallic powder. J Mater Process Technol 213(4):606–13Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gustmann T, Neves A, Kühn U, Gargarella P, Kiminami CS, Bolfarini C, Eckert J, Pauly S (2016) Influence of processing parameters on the fabrication of a Cu-Al-Ni-Mn shape-memory alloy by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 11:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dai D, Gu D, Zhang H, Xiong J, Ma C, Hong C, Poprawe R (2018) Influence of scan strategy and molten pool configuration on microstructures and tensile properties of selective laser melting additive manufactured aluminum based parts. Opt Laser Technol 99:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spierings A, Herres N, Levy G (2011) Influence of the particle size distribution on surface quality and mechanical properties in AM steel parts. Rapid Prototyp J 17(3):195–202Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Joguet D, Costil S, Liao H, Danlos Y (2016) Porosity content control of CoCrMo and titanium parts by Taguchi method applied to selective laser melting process parameter. Rapid Prototyp J 22(1):20–30Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM (2014) Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion. ASTM. p. 1–9Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roy RK (2010) A primer on the Taguchi method. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khorasani AM, Gibson I, Goldberg M, Littlefair G (2016) A survey on mechanisms and critical parameters on solidification of selective laser melting during fabrication of Ti-6Al-4V prosthetic acetabular cup. Mater Des 103:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boyer R, Welsch G, Collings EW (1994) Materials properties handbook: titanium alloys. ASM internationalGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khorasani AM, Jalali Aghchai A, Khorram A (2011) Chatter prediction in turning process of conical workpieces by using case-based resoning (CBR) method and taguchi design of experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5–8):457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ruck DW et al (1990) The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1(4):296–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khorasani AM, Yazdi MRS, Safizadeh MSJIJOE (2011) Tool Life Prediction in Face Milling Machiningof 7075 Al by Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Taguchi Design of Experiment (DOE). Int J Eng Technol 3(1):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khorasani A, Yazdi MRS (2015) Development of a dynamic surface roughness monitoring system based on artificial neural networks (ANN) in milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–11Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mertens A, Reginster S, Paydas H, Contrepois Q, Dormal T, Lemaire O, Lecomte-Beckers J (2014) Mechanical properties of alloy Ti–6Al–4V and of stainless steel 316L processed by selective laser melting: influence of out-of-equilibrium microstructures. Powder Metall 57(3):184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khorasani A, Yazdi MRS (2017) Development of a dynamic surface roughness monitoring system based on artificial neural networks (ANN) in milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1–4):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pupo Y, Monroy KP, Ciurana J (2015) Influence of process parameters on surface quality of CoCrMo produced by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5–8):985–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rafi H et al (2013) Microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. J Mater Eng Perform 22(12):3872–3883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Safdar A, He HZ, Wei LY, Snis A, Chavez de Paz LE (2012) Effect of process parameters settings and thickness on surface roughness of EBM produced Ti-6Al-4V. Rapid Prototyp J 18(5):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berthier J (2012) Micro-drops and digital microfluidics. 2nd ed. William AndrewGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malkin AY, Isayev AI (2017) Rheology: concepts, methods, and applications. 3rd ed. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khorasani AM, Gibson I, Ghaderi AR (2018) Rheological characterization of process parameters influence on surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(9):3761–3775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Averyanova M, Cicala E, Bertrand P, Grevey D (2012) Experimental design approach to optimize selective laser melting of martensitic 17-4 PH powder: part I–single laser tracks and first layer. Rapid Prototyp J 18(1):28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Qiu C, Adkins NJE, Attallah MM (2013) Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A 578:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ahn IH, Moon SK, Hwang J, Bi G (2017) Characteristic length of the solidified melt pool in selective laser melting process. Rapid Prototyp J 23(2):370–81Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Atthey D (1980) A mathematical model for fluid flow in a weld pool at high currents. J Fluid Mech 98(4):787–801MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li X et al (2015) Effect of substrate temperature on the interface bond between support and substrate during selective laser melting of Al–Ni–Y–Co–La metallic glass. Mater Des 65:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sieniawski J, Ziaja W, Kubiak K, Motyka M (2013) Microstructure and mechanical properties of high strength two-phase titanium alloys. Titanium Alloys-Advances in Properties Control. InTech Open.  https://doi.org/10.5772/56197
  47. 47.
    Jovanović M et al (2006) The effect of annealing temperatures and cooling rates on microstructure and mechanical properties of investment cast Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Des 27(3):192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    ASM Hanbook Volume 2 (2010) Properties and Selection: Nonferrous and specialpurpose Materials, Titanium and Titanium Alloy Castings Product Application Vol. 2. ASTM international, AmericaGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Facchini L, Magalini E, Robotti P, Molinari A, Höges S, Wissenbach K (2010) Ductility of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J 16(6):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Simonelli M, Tse YY, Tuck C (2014) Effect of the build orientation on the mechanical properties and fracture modes of SLM Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A 616:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vilaro T, Colin C, Bartout J-D (2011) As-fabricated and heat-treated microstructures of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans A 42(10):3190–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Thöne M, Leuders S, Riemer A, Tröster T, Richard H (eds) (2012). Influence of heat-treatment on Selective Laser Melting products–eg Ti6Al4V. Solid freeform fabrication symposium SFF, Austin TexasGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Mahyar Khorasani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ian Gibson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Alireza Ghaderi
    • 4
  • Mazher Iqbal Mohammed
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringDeakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanics of Solids, Surfaces & Systems, Faculty of Engineering TechnologyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Fraunhofer Centre for Complex System Engineering, Department of Design, Production and ManagementUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Institute for Frontier MaterialsDeakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia

Personalised recommendations