Investigation of the influence of SiC content and particle size variation on the corrosion resistance of Al-SiC matrix composite in neutral chloride solution

  • Roland Tolulope LotoEmail author


The effect of SiC content in 1070 aluminum at 10%, 15%, and 20% SiC contents in 1.75% neutral chloride solution was studied by potentiodynamic polarization and open circuit potential measurement. Results showed the aluminum composite at 10% SiC displayed the lowest corrosion rate. Increase in SiC content coupled with the electrochemical action of chloride anions increased the occurrence of localized corrosion as shown in the decrease of the passivation curve and morphological representations through optical microscopy analysis. Positive shifts in corrosion potential data with respect to SiC content show the dominant influence of anodic dissolution reactions. Further analysis of the effect of SiC particle size variation (3 μm, 9 μm, 29 μm, and 45 μm) on the corrosion resistance of the aluminum composite at 10% SiC showed the aluminum composite at with 3-μm particle size had the lowest corrosion rate though all particle sizes studied showed extended passivation range. Cathodic potential shift was observed due to dominant reduction electrochemical reactions associated with localized corrosion and weakening of the passive film as the SiC particle size increases. It must be stated that increase in SiC particle size does not necessarily impaired the passive protective film of 1070AL/SiC matrix.


Composite Aluminum Pitting Corrosion Passivation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The author acknowledges the Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria, for the sponsorship and provision of research facilities for this project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Chawla KK (2013) Composite materials: science and engineering. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lees JK, Dhihra AK, McCullough RL (2005) Composite materials. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahendra BM, Arulshri K, Iyandurai N (2013) Evaluation of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy 2024 reinforced with silicon carbide and fly ash hybrid metal matrix composites. Am J Appl Sci 10(3):219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neelima DC, Mahesh V, Selvaraj N (2011) Mechanical characterization of aluminum silicon carbide composite. Int J App Eng Res 1(4):793–799Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh R, Singla E (2012) Tribological characterization of aluminum-silicon carbide composite prepared by mechanical alloying. Int J App Eng Res 7(11):1420–1423Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alaneme KK, Olubambi PA, Afolabi AS, Bodurin MO (2014) Corrosion and tribological studies of bamboo leaf ash and alumina reinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composites in chloride medium. Int J Elect Sci 9:5663–5674Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prasad DS, Shoba C, Ramanaiah N (2014) Investigations on mechanical properties of aluminum hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol 3(1):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trowsdale AJ, Noble B, Harris SJ, Gibbins ISR, Thompson GE, Wood GC (1996) The influence of silicon carbide reinforcement on the pitting behavior of aluminum. Corros Sci 38(2):177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Callister WD Jr (2007) Materials science and engineering. An introduction, 7th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abbas MK (2010) Effects of friction stir welding on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of aluminum alloy AA6061-T651. In proceedings of the 2nd regional conference for engineering sciences, Baghdad, pp. 1–2Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ambat R, Davenport AJ, Scamans GM, Afseth A (2006) Effect of iron-containing intermetallic particles on the corrosion behaviour of aluminum. Corros Sci 48(11):3455–3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopinath K, Balasubramaniam R, Murthy VSR (2001) Corrosion behavior of cast Al-Al2O3 particulate composites. J Mater Sci Lett 20(9):793–794. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans S, Koehler EL (1961) Use of polarization methods in the determination of the rate of corrosion of aluminum alloys in anaerobic media. J Electrochem Soc 108:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bockris JOM, Reddy AKN (1974) Modern electrochemistry 2, 3rd edn. Plenum Press, New York, pp 862–910Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foley RT, Nguyen IH (1982) The chemical nature of aluminum corrosion V. energy transfer in aluminum dissolution. J Electrochem Soc 129(3):464–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCafferty E (2003) Sequence of steps in the pitting of aluminum by chloride ions. Corros Sci 45(7):1421–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bennour I, Maurice V, Marcus P (2010) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the interaction of ultra-thin alumina films on NiAl alloys with NaCl solutions. Surf Interface Anal 42(6–7):581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen TH, Foley RT (1979) On the mechanism of pitting of aluminum. J Electrochem Soc 126(11):1855–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vargel C, Jacques M, Schmidt MP (2004) Corrosion of aluminum. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomcsanyi L, Varga K, Bartik I, Horanyi G, Maleczki E (1989) Electrochemical study of the pitting corrosion of aluminium and its alloys-II. Study of the interaction of chloride ions with a passive film on aluminum and initiation of pitting corrosion. Electrochim Acta 34(6):855–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazhar AA, Badawy WA, Abou-romia MM (1986) Impedance studies of corrosion resistance of aluminium in chloride media. Surf Coat Technol 29:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations